本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

stripe-subscription-billing-test-author

Builds test suites for Stripe recurring-billing flows: trial-to-paid conversion, proration on plan upgrade and downgrade, dunning on failed renewal, cancel and reactivation, and the full subscription webhook event matrix (invoice.payment_failed, customer.subscription.updated, customer.subscription.deleted, invoice.paid). Uses Stripe Billing test clocks (POST /v1/test_helpers/test_clocks) to time-travel through billing cycles without calendar delay. Distinct from stripe-test-cards-and-webhooks (one-time PaymentIntents) and payment-flow-test-author (idempotency + replay robustness). Does not cover single-event CLI replay or handler idempotency testing (see payment-flow-test-author for those). Use when authoring tests for subscription or recurring-billing integrations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qaスター 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)
連携ツールStripe

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md13.6 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json931 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

stripe-subscription-billing-test-author

Overview

Subscription billing is distinct from one-time payments. A customer's card is charged on a schedule, trials expire, plans change mid-cycle, and payments fail weeks after signup. Per docs.stripe.com/billing/testing, Stripe's sandbox is feature-complete for billing objects: subscriptions, invoices, trials, and retry schedules all work against test data.

The key tool for deterministic subscription testing is the Stripe Billing test clock, which lets you fast-forward a frozen simulation through days, weeks, or months without waiting. Per docs.stripe.com/api/test_clocks, a test clock is created at a frozen_time and advanced with POST /v1/test_helpers/test_clocks/{id}/advance, triggering all billing events that would have fired in the elapsed interval.

This skill walks through five recurring-billing scenarios end to end.

Lifecycle states to test

Per docs.stripe.com/billing/subscriptions/overview, subscriptions move through:

StateMeaning
trialingTrial active; no payment collected yet
activeGood standing; payment collected
past_dueLatest invoice unpaid; smart retries running
unpaidRetries exhausted; access decision pending
canceledTerminal; billing stopped
pausedTrial ended without payment method attached

Each transition fires one or more webhook events. Tests must assert both the subscription status and the correct event sequence.

Step 1 - Create a test clock

Per docs.stripe.com/api/test_clocks, create a test clock frozen at a known epoch before creating any billing objects:

const clock = await stripe.testHelpers.testClocks.create({
  frozen_time: Math.floor(new Date('2025-01-01T00:00:00Z').getTime() / 1000),
  name: 'billing-suite-run',
});

Attach the customer to the clock at creation time:

const customer = await stripe.customers.create({
  email: 'tester@example.com',
  test_clock: clock.id,
  payment_method: 'pm_card_visa',  // 4242 4242 4242 4242
  invoice_settings: { default_payment_method: 'pm_card_visa' },
});

Advance time with:

await stripe.testHelpers.testClocks.advance(clock.id, {
  advances_to: Math.floor(new Date('2025-01-08T00:00:00Z').getTime() / 1000),
});
// Poll until clock.status === 'ready' before asserting

Always poll GET /v1/test_helpers/test_clocks/{id} until status is ready before asserting subscription state; events are asynchronous.

Step 2 - Trial-to-paid conversion

Per docs.stripe.com/billing/testing, the recommended flow:

// Freeze clock at Jan 1
const sub = await stripe.subscriptions.create({
  customer: customer.id,
  items: [{ price: PRICE_ID }],
  trial_end: Math.floor(new Date('2025-01-08T00:00:00Z').getTime() / 1000),
});
expect(sub.status).toBe('trialing');

// Advance to Day 5 - trial_will_end fires 3 days before trial ends
await stripe.testHelpers.testClocks.advance(clock.id, {
  advances_to: toEpoch('2025-01-05'),
});
await waitForClockReady(clock.id);
// Assert: customer.subscription.trial_will_end webhook fired

// Advance past trial end (Day 8)
await stripe.testHelpers.testClocks.advance(clock.id, {
  advances_to: toEpoch('2025-01-09'),
});
await waitForClockReady(clock.id);

const updated = await stripe.subscriptions.retrieve(sub.id);
expect(updated.status).toBe('active');

Webhook events to assert per docs.stripe.com/billing/testing:

Clock positionEvent
Day 5customer.subscription.trial_will_end
Day 8invoice.created, invoice.finalized, invoice.paid
Day 8customer.subscription.updated (status: trialing -> active)

Step 3 - Proration on upgrade/downgrade

Per docs.stripe.com/billing/subscriptions/prorations, a mid-cycle plan change generates a credit for unused time on the old price and a charge for remaining time on the new price. Preview before applying:

const prorationDate = Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000);

// Preview the upcoming invoice to verify proration amounts
const preview = await stripe.invoices.createPreview({
  customer: customer.id,
  subscription: sub.id,
  subscription_details: {
    items: [{ id: sub.items.data[0].id, price: NEW_PRICE_ID }],
    proration_date: prorationDate,
  },
});

// Verify credit (negative) and debit (positive) line items exist
const credit = preview.lines.data.find(l => l.amount < 0);
const debit  = preview.lines.data.find(l => l.amount > 0);
expect(credit).toBeTruthy();
expect(debit).toBeTruthy();

// Apply at the same proration_date to lock the amounts
await stripe.subscriptions.update(sub.id, {
  items: [{ id: sub.items.data[0].id, price: NEW_PRICE_ID }],
  proration_date: prorationDate,
  proration_behavior: 'create_prorations',  // default
});

Per docs.stripe.com/billing/subscriptions/prorations, proration_behavior options are:

ValueEffect
create_prorationsCreates proration items; billed on next invoice (default)
always_invoiceCreates proration items AND immediately invoices
noneNo proration; full new price on next cycle

Downgrade test: pass a lower-priced plan as NEW_PRICE_ID and assert the credit line item is larger than the debit line item.

Step 4 - Dunning on failed renewal

Per docs.stripe.com/billing/testing, use test card 4000 0000 0000 0341 to trigger payment failure on an active subscription. Per docs.stripe.com/billing/revenue-recovery/smart-retries, Smart Retries can be configured for up to 8 attempts within a 2-month window; invoice.payment_failed fires on each failed attempt with attempt_count and next_payment_attempt fields.

// Attach a card that will decline on recurring collection
const failMethod = await stripe.paymentMethods.attach('pm_card_chargeDeclinedInsufficientFunds', {
  customer: customer.id,
});
await stripe.customers.update(customer.id, {
  invoice_settings: { default_payment_method: failMethod.id },
});

// Advance past the renewal date
await stripe.testHelpers.testClocks.advance(clock.id, {
  advances_to: toEpoch('2025-02-02'),  // One day past renewal
});
await waitForClockReady(clock.id);

const invoice = await getLatestInvoice(sub.id);
expect(invoice.status).toBe('open');

const sub2 = await stripe.subscriptions.retrieve(sub.id);
expect(sub2.status).toBe('past_due');
// Assert invoice.payment_failed was received with attempt_count >= 1

Webhook sequence on failed renewal:

EventKey field to assert
invoice.payment_failedattempt_count, next_payment_attempt
customer.subscription.updatedstatus: past_due

Test recovery: attach a valid payment method, then call stripe.invoices.pay(invoice.id) and assert invoice.paid fires and subscription returns to active.

Step 5 - Cancel and reactivation

// Cancel at period end (access persists until billing cycle closes)
await stripe.subscriptions.update(sub.id, { cancel_at_period_end: true });
const canceling = await stripe.subscriptions.retrieve(sub.id);
expect(canceling.cancel_at_period_end).toBe(true);

// Advance past period end
await stripe.testHelpers.testClocks.advance(clock.id, {
  advances_to: toEpoch('2025-02-02'),
});
await waitForClockReady(clock.id);

const canceled = await stripe.subscriptions.retrieve(sub.id);
expect(canceled.status).toBe('canceled');
// Assert: customer.subscription.deleted webhook fired

// Reactivation: create a new subscription (canceled is terminal)
const reactivated = await stripe.subscriptions.create({
  customer: customer.id,
  items: [{ price: PRICE_ID }],
});
expect(reactivated.status).toBe('active');

Per docs.stripe.com/billing/subscriptions/overview, canceled is a terminal state; reactivation means creating a fresh subscription, not updating the canceled one.

Step 6 - Webhook event matrix

Per docs.stripe.com/billing/testing, the full set of events your handler must process:

EventTriggerRequired handler action
customer.subscription.createdNew subscriptionRecord subscription ID + status
customer.subscription.trial_will_end3 days before trial endNotify customer
customer.subscription.updatedAny status or plan changeSync local subscription record
customer.subscription.deletedCancellation takes effectRevoke access
invoice.createdInvoice generated at renewalFinalize within 72 hours
invoice.finalizedInvoice ready for collectionLog for audit
invoice.paidPayment succeededProvision or extend access
invoice.payment_failedPayment attempt failedNotify customer; track attempt_count
invoice.payment_action_required3DS required on renewalPrompt re-authentication

Trigger these in CI using the Stripe CLI:

stripe trigger invoice.payment_failed
stripe trigger customer.subscription.updated

Per docs.stripe.com/stripe-cli, forward webhook events to a local handler during development:

stripe listen --forward-to http://localhost:3000/webhooks/stripe

Running

npm test -- --testPathPattern=billing

For integration tests that drive test clocks:

STRIPE_TEST_KEY=sk_test_... npm test -- --testPathPattern=billing/integration

CI integration

jobs:
  billing-tests:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v5
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
      - run: npm ci && npm test -- --testPathPattern=billing
        env:
          STRIPE_TEST_KEY: ${{ secrets.STRIPE_TEST_KEY }}
          STRIPE_WEBHOOK_SECRET: ${{ secrets.STRIPE_WEBHOOK_SECRET }}

Test-clock tests do not require stripe listen because they drive the Stripe API directly without local webhook forwarding. Signature verification tests do need STRIPE_WEBHOOK_SECRET.

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
setTimeout to wait for trial endFlaky and slow in CIUse test clock + waitForClockReady
Asserting subscription state before clock is readyRace condition; events not yet firedPoll GET /v1/test_helpers/test_clocks/{id}
Reusing a test clock customer across test casesShared state leaks between scenariosCreate a fresh clock + customer per scenario
Canceling and immediately reusing as activecanceled is terminalCreate a new subscription for reactivation
Skipping invoice.paid handlerAccess provisioned on subscription create, not paymentProvision only after invoice.paid
Omitting proration_date from preview AND update callsTiming skew makes amounts disagreeUse the same epoch timestamp for both
Testing only invoice.payment_failed onceSmart Retries fires multiple times with growing attempt_countTest at least two retry cycles

Limitations

  • Test clocks only work in sandbox (test mode); they are not available in live mode.
  • Per docs.stripe.com/api/test_clocks, a test clock cannot be advanced backward; frozen time is monotonically forward-only.
  • Smart Retry timing in test mode compresses retry intervals; exact retry schedule differs from production per docs.stripe.com/billing/revenue-recovery/smart-retries.
  • Stripe CLI trigger sends synthetic events; test-clock-driven tests produce real invoice objects and are preferred for billing accuracy.

References

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

testland のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する