本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

toxiproxy-chaos

Configures Toxiproxy for TCP-level fault injection - runs as a sidecar / proxy between client and upstream, applies toxics (latency, bandwidth, slow_close, timeout, slicer, limit_data, reset_peer) via control API. Focused on the proxy itself rather than an API-level chaos runner, including non-test usage (chaos in dev environments, integration tests, pre-prod simulation). Use when the team needs TCP-precise fault injection in development / integration environments without K8s or commercial tooling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qaスター 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)
連携ツールShopifyKubernetes

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md7.8 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json634 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

toxiproxy-chaos

Overview

Toxiproxy is Shopify's "TCP proxy to simulate network and system conditions for chaos and resiliency testing" (toxiproxy-readme). It sits between client and upstream; you configure toxics via its HTTP control API.

This skill is the infrastructure / dev-environment angle. The test-suite-driven angle is in api-chaos-runner (in the qa-api-testing plugin); both rely on the same Toxiproxy primitive.

When to use

  • Local dev needs to simulate slow / failing network conditions for development / debugging.
  • A pre-prod environment needs network chaos without K8s tooling.
  • Integration tests need TCP-level fault injection that's framework-agnostic.
  • A team wants OSS chaos without Litmus / Chaos Mesh / Gremlin.

For test-suite integration, see api-chaos-runner.

Step 1 - Install + run

# Pull the official image
docker pull ghcr.io/shopify/toxiproxy:latest

# Run as a daemon
docker run --rm -p 8474:8474 -p 5432:5432 ghcr.io/shopify/toxiproxy:latest

# Or natively (Linux):
brew install toxiproxy   # macOS
# Then: toxiproxy-server

Port 8474 is the control API; other ports are listeners for proxied traffic.

Step 2 - Define a proxy

Via the control API:

curl -d '{"name":"orders-db","listen":"0.0.0.0:5432","upstream":"orders-db-real:5432"}' \
  http://localhost:8474/proxies

Or via the CLI:

toxiproxy-cli create -l 0.0.0.0:5432 -u orders-db-real:5432 orders-db
toxiproxy-cli list

The application connects to localhost:5432 (Toxiproxy listener); Toxiproxy forwards to orders-db-real:5432.

Step 3 - Toxic catalog

Per toxiproxy-readme, the canonical toxics:

ToxicEffect
latencyAdd latency to all data passing through
downForce the proxy down (no connections accepted)
bandwidthCap bandwidth in kbps
slow_closeDelay TCP socket close
timeoutStop forwarding traffic after a delay; let connection time out
slicerSlice TCP data into smaller bits
limit_dataCap total bytes through the proxy
reset_peerReset connection on the next byte

Step 4 - Add toxics

# 500ms latency on every request through the orders-db proxy
toxiproxy-cli toxic add -t latency -a latency=500 orders-db

# Bandwidth cap at 50 KB/s
toxiproxy-cli toxic add -t bandwidth -a rate=50 orders-db

# Force the proxy down (kill the connection)
toxiproxy-cli toxic add -t timeout -a timeout=5000 orders-db

# Remove all toxics on this proxy
toxiproxy-cli toxic remove orders-db -n latency

Toxics can apply on upstream (data going from client → server) or downstream (server → client) directions. Default: both.

Step 5 - Direction-specific toxics

toxiproxy-cli toxic add -t latency -a latency=500 -n upstream-latency --downstream=false orders-db
toxiproxy-cli toxic add -t latency -a latency=200 -n downstream-latency --upstream=false orders-db

Useful when the client / server have asymmetric tolerances.

Step 6 - Language SDKs

Per toxiproxy-readme, SDKs exist for Python, Node, Go, Ruby:

# Python
from toxiproxy import Toxiproxy
client = Toxiproxy()
proxy = client.create('orders-db', '0.0.0.0:5432', 'orders-db-real:5432')
proxy.add_toxic(name='latency', type='latency', attributes={'latency': 500})
# ... run app ...
proxy.destroy()
// Node
const Toxiproxy = require('toxiproxy-node-client');
const client = new Toxiproxy('http://localhost:8474');
const proxy = await client.createProxy({ name: 'orders-db', listen: '0.0.0.0:5432', upstream: 'orders-db-real:5432' });
await proxy.addToxic({ type: 'latency', attributes: { latency: 500 } });

The SDKs make integration into test fixtures (per playwright-fixture-builder) clean.

Step 7 - docker-compose integration

# docker-compose.test.yml
services:
  toxiproxy:
    image: ghcr.io/shopify/toxiproxy:latest
    ports:
      - 8474:8474        # control
      - 5432:5432        # proxied DB
      - 8080:8080        # proxied API

  app:
    environment:
      DB_HOST: toxiproxy
      DB_PORT: 5432
      EXTERNAL_API_URL: http://toxiproxy:8080

The app points at Toxiproxy; tests configure toxics via the control API.

Step 8 - Use cases

Use caseHow
Test resilience patternsInject latency / failure; verify retry / timeout / circuit-breaker
Reproduce a production incidentReplicate the network conditions; debug locally
Pre-prod simulationChaos in staging; verify the team's runbook
Dev-time exploration"What if the DB is slow?" - engineer toggles a toxic
Integration test fixturesPer-test toxic add / remove via SDK (per Step 6)

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
Toxiproxy in productionAdds proxy latency + failure surface to real traffic.Test / staging only.
Forgetting to remove toxics after testSubsequent tests inherit chaos; flaky.Cleanup in afterEach / context manager.
One global Toxiproxy for parallel testsTests fight over shared toxic state.One Toxiproxy per parallel worker.
Skipping direction (default = both)Asymmetric scenarios miss.Explicit --upstream=false / --downstream=false (Step 5).
Manual control-API curl in testsVerbose; error-prone.Use language SDK (Step 6).

Limitations

  • TCP only. UDP, QUIC, raw IP - out of scope.
  • Not for K8s pod chaos. For pod-level / node-level chaos, use chaos-mesh or LitmusChaos (references/litmus.md in chaos-experiment-author).
  • Single-node deployment. No clustering; for distributed chaos, use a chaos-platform tool.
  • Application must point at Toxiproxy. Requires config change (DB_HOST, etc.); transparent proxying isn't built-in.

References

  • tp - Toxiproxy README: TCP proxy, toxic types (latency, down, bandwidth, slow_close, timeout, slicer, limit_data, reset_peer), control API on port 8474, language SDKs.
  • api-chaos-runner - sister skill: same Toxiproxy primitive, test-suite-driven matrix workflow.
  • failure-injection-test-author - composes Toxiproxy + WireMock for richer failure scenarios.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testland/qa132026年10月20日 更新

testland のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する