Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Use inclusive language. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Language shapes experience—ableist, gendered, or exclusionary terminology creates unwelcoming experiences and reinforces harmful stereotypes, even unintentionally.
Review content for ableist language (crazy, lame, blind to), gendered assumptions (he/she defaults), cultural bias, and exclusionary terminology. Verify error messages and instructions are respectful and constructive.
Replace ableist terms with neutral alternatives. Use gender-neutral language (they, users, people). Avoid idioms that may not translate across cultures. Write error messages that guide rather than blame.
Explain how language shapes experience and can unintentionally exclude or harm users, and why inclusive language creates welcoming digital spaces for everyone.
Review the rendered markup and interactive states that affect Use inclusive language. Flag exact elements, roles, labels, focus behavior, or keyboard interactions that violate the rule, and note how to verify the fix with browser accessibility tooling or assistive tech.
For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance,
see references/rule.md.
Rule page: https://frontendchecklist.io/rules/accessibility/inclusive-language
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Create a custom 404 error page. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability related to Create a dedicated About page. Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response rather than relying only on source files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing component libraries, page flows, or CI pipelines that need repeatable accessibility checks. Automated testing is strongest at catching structural and attribute-level issues; it does not replace keyboard, screen reader, and manual UX testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing sign-in, sign-up, MFA, CAPTCHA, recovery, and re-auth flows. Evaluate the full authentication path, including error handling and backup methods, not just the primary login form.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Make notifications accessible. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Use semantic table markup for screen readers. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。