本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

thinking-bounded-rationality

Use when search or investigation could run forever. Set an explicit good-enough threshold first, then stop at the first option that clears it.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md2.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Bounded Rationality

Under finite tool, context, and time budgets, stop at the first option that meets a predeclared aspiration level. Optimize only when the good-to-best gap is worth the remaining budget.

When to Use

  • Search or option comparison has no natural endpoint and could consume the turn budget.
  • Multiple options would clear the requirement and further comparison has diminishing returns.
  • The decision is reversible or low-stakes relative to more search.
  • You are gathering context beyond what the decision needs to ship.

When NOT to Use

  • Irreversible or high-stakes choices (data loss, security, migrations, public commitments) where the good-to-best gap is material.
  • Correctness gates: tests, security checks, and "did the fix work?" need the right answer, not a sufficient-looking one.
  • One cheap lookup would settle the fact — do it; do not satisfice past it.
  • The aspiration level cannot be stated — clarify the requirement first.

Procedure

  1. State decision and budget. Name the choice, residual tool/context/time budget, and reversibility.
  2. Set aspiration before searching. Write concrete pass/fail criteria for "good enough." Do not evaluate until the threshold is explicit.
  3. Search sequentially. Score options in encounter order against the threshold only. Skip full matrices unless step 1 marked high-stakes/irreversible.
  4. Stop at first adequate. When an option clears every criterion, select it immediately.
  5. Handle search failure without moving the goalposts. If nothing clears after the pre-set cap, preserve the threshold and report no adequate option. Relax only a criterion predeclared as non-load-bearing, record the relaxation, and resume within a new cap; never raise the bar after failure.
  6. Commit. Record choice and residual uncertainty; spend remaining budget on execution, not re-ranking.

Stop condition: First option meets the predeclared aspiration level, or the search cap is exhausted with none adequate.

Output

Decision: <choice>
Aspiration: <pass/fail criteria>
Search: evaluated N; stopped at first adequate | cap exhausted
Selected: <option or none>
Residual risk: <what further search might change>
Next spend: <execution step>

Verification

  • Falsify if you kept comparing after an option cleared the threshold, or invented the threshold after seeing winners.
  • Falsify if a correctness gate or irreversible decision was treated as satisficeable.
  • Over-application guard: if one cheap check settles a fact, look it up — do not invoke this skill.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use when a specific claim may lack grounding. Check evidence boundary, size wrongness cost, then answer, fetch, or abstain — never confabulate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills1,6292026年8月8日 更新

When the right response mode is unclear, classify the cause-effect domain first; decompose disorder.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills1,6292026年8月8日 更新

Under genuine uncertainty with no reliable forecast, inventory means, cap downside at affordable loss, act for commitments, and let goals emerge from controllable moves.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills1,6292026年8月8日 更新

When a constraint is treated as fixed, separate physics from convention, keep only independently supported primitives, and rebuild the simplest solution that satisfies real constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills1,6292026年8月8日 更新

When a fault is localized and the proximate cause is known but the systemic root is not, chain evidence-linked whys with a counterfactual stop and a countermeasure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills1,6292026年8月8日 更新

Deciding what to build or why adoption fails. Recover the progress users hire a solution for under a circumstance, then rank by outcome and competing workarounds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills1,6292026年8月8日 更新

tjboudreaux のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する