Use when search or investigation could run forever. Set an explicit good-enough threshold first, then stop at the first option that clears it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a specific claim may lack grounding. Check evidence boundary, size wrongness cost, then answer, fetch, or abstain — never confabulate.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Treat competence as an evidence boundary, not self-image. Answer only when grounded; otherwise fetch, mark uncertainty, or abstain. The failure mode is a fluent fabrication treated as fact.
Stop condition: Claim answered with grounding, marked partial with a check path, or refused with missing-evidence note.
Claim: <assertion>
Zone: grounded | partial | ungrounded
Evidence: <source or none>
Wrongness cost: low | medium | high
Action: answer | fetch-then-answer | answer-with-uncertainty | abstain/ask
Response: <wording or missing artifact>
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when search or investigation could run forever. Set an explicit good-enough threshold first, then stop at the first option that clears it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the right response mode is unclear, classify the cause-effect domain first; decompose disorder.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Under genuine uncertainty with no reliable forecast, inventory means, cap downside at affordable loss, act for commitments, and let goals emerge from controllable moves.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When a constraint is treated as fixed, separate physics from convention, keep only independently supported primitives, and rebuild the simplest solution that satisfies real constraints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When a fault is localized and the proximate cause is known but the systemic root is not, chain evidence-linked whys with a counterfactual stop and a countermeasure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deciding what to build or why adoption fails. Recover the progress users hire a solution for under a circumstance, then rank by outcome and competing workarounds.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。