本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

merge

Carry the current repository change through a verified GitHub pull request merge into the requested base, or the repository's remote default branch when none is named, then clean up only the merged worktree and its owned development processes. Always use this skill for an actual PR merge or its post-merge cleanup, including requests to inspect, finish, land, or merge an existing PR; create a PR and merge it; preserve meaningful commits; or clean up an already-merged worktree. Report an existing merge instead of duplicating it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

toy-crane/claude-code-playbook-templateスター 77(GitHub 77 + cccskills 0)
連携ツールGitHub

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(8)

  • SKILL.md4.5 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml220 B
  • evals/control-trigger-evals.json547 B
  • evals/evals.json12.1 KB
  • evals/heldout-trigger-evals.json769 B
  • evals/test-stop-worktree-server.sh6.7 KB
  • evals/trigger-evals.json1.6 KB
  • scripts/stop-worktree-server.sh3.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Merge pull request

Carry the current request's change through a pull request, verified merge, and safe local cleanup. Complete the necessary commit, synchronization, publication, and PR work without depending on other skills.

Start from current remote truth. Preserve unrelated work, commit only the request's changes as logical Conventional Commits, resolve the named base or the remote's advertised default branch, and create or reuse a ready-for-review pull request based on its fetched state. If the change or its pull request is already merged, verify and report that outcome instead of creating another one.

Make the body understandable

When creating or updating an open PR, write for a reviewer without the conversation history: explain the problem, concrete before-and-after behavior, why it changed, and what verification establishes. Scale the explanation to the change; a typo fix needs only a brief description and relevant validation. Include mechanisms, a diagram for complex flows, actual alternatives and trade-offs, affected users or integrations, and specific unresolved judgments when they help assess the change. Keep the whole change understandable beyond those highlighted judgments; omit empty sections and invented alternatives or questions.

For screen changes, capture the actual base and head at matching viewport, data, and state, or reuse evidence verified to match those revisions. Embed before-and-after screenshots side by side in the body, with a short explanation of the difference and its reason. Identify the revisions, screen and capture conditions, including unavoidable differences. Add actual interaction video when still images cannot explain the important behavior. Separate observed results from source inference and unverified states; a prototype is not runtime evidence. When updating an existing PR, bring its explanation and evidence into line with the final change, replacing outdated visual claims.

Before uploading, inspect screenshots and videos for credentials, personal data, and private information. Use safe seeded data or redact those details throughout the media, keeping comparison conditions and the relevant change visible. Upload only the inspected, safe media as GitHub attachments, using a supported mechanism in the current environment. For GitHub CLI, check attachment support: gh pr create and gh pr edit accept repeatable --attach on supported versions and rewrite matching local image references in --body-file to uploaded URLs. A Markdown table can place the two images side by side. Keep review captures outside repository history; no separate image host is needed.

If baseline execution, capture, or upload is unavailable, state the exact limit and present only the evidence obtained. Inspect the resulting remote body and attachments before reporting them as available to reviewers; a local path is not a published image. A partial upload may still create the PR: inspect and repair that PR instead of duplicating it. Carry successful attachment URLs from the remote body into its replacement, and replace unusable local references with an honest limitation if recovery fails.

Merge and clean up

Preserve multiple commits with a rebase merge only when they are meaningful, independent units worth retaining in the base branch; use a squash merge otherwise. Respect required checks and reviews, and treat the remote pull request state as the authority for whether the merge succeeded.

Clean up only after the remote reports MERGED. Before removing a linked worktree, run the bundled server cleanup helper from that worktree when applicable. Remove only the merged worktree and branch, preserve other worktrees, processes, and user changes, then bring the canonical base checkout to the merged remote state using whatever safe mechanism the current host provides.

Finish with the merged pull request URL, merge strategy, verified remote state, and cleanup result. Keep a cleanup failure visible without misreporting the already verified merge.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Audit and establish current agent context for the technologies that define a project's stack. Use when setting up a project for agent work, after selecting or adding a framework, library, developer tool, or hosted service, or when entering an existing project whose agent context has not been audited.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

toy-crane/claude-code-playbook-template772026年10月21日 更新

Revise active `docs/specs/SLUG/` specs so they match what has shipped since they were written. Use when earlier work has landed and queued specs may now rest on stale assumptions, acceptance criteria, constraints, terms, or prototypes, or when implementation reports a spec as stale before changing source. Takes one or more spec folders, or every folder under `docs/specs/` when none is named. Do not use to shape a new spec from a problem and direction, which belongs to `shape-idea`, or to reconcile durable project context and retire shipped folders, which belongs to `maintain-project-context`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

toy-crane/claude-code-playbook-template772026年10月21日 更新

Build a complete dummy-data HTML prototype or a temporary comparison of up to three alternatives for a specific user situation. Use to settle a screen-based product before implementation or resolve a visual or interaction decision during shaping or prototype review. Do not use for production implementation or CLI, terminal, or voice interfaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

toy-crane/claude-code-playbook-template772026年10月21日 更新

commit

無料

Create Git commits for the current request's in-scope changes as logical Conventional Commits. Always use this skill for an actual Git commit operation, including requests to commit or amend changes, save work in repository history, stage and record selected files, or group staged or unstaged changes into commits. Use it even when the request describes recording changes without saying "commit"; it performs the commit rather than only suggesting a message, and it does not push.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

toy-crane/claude-code-playbook-template772026年10月21日 更新

Interview the user to define or revise the app's overall product direction, then preserve the confirmed meaning in root PRODUCT.md. Always use for a new app direction or any app-wide change to users, usage situations, problem, promised change, core loop, durable boundaries, experience principles, success signals, assumptions, or unknowns, even when PRODUCT.md is not named. Start from an existing definition or a rough app direction. Do not use for blank-page idea discovery, architecture, or shaping or specifying one feature or work unit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

toy-crane/claude-code-playbook-template772026年10月21日 更新

Render an explanation as a diagram, comparison, trace with real values, or annotated code. Use when the user asks to have a concept, decision, flow, or code explained, or says they do not follow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

toy-crane/claude-code-playbook-template772026年10月21日 更新

toy-crane のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する