Locate and sync the reference specs and runtimes vendored under vendor/ — the Wasm, WASI P3, and Component Model specs, and the wasm-tools and wasmtime sources. Use whenever an answer should come from one of those sources rather than memory, and whenever vendor/ is missing or stale.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
実行スコア 未検証
インストール方法を見るインストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
vendor/vendor/wasm/ - WebAssembly/specvendor/wasi/ - WebAssembly/WASIvendor/component-model/ - WebAssembly/component-model (CM spec)
vendor/component-model/design/mvp/CanonicalABI.mdvendor/component-model/design/mvp/Concurrency.mdvendor/component-model/design/mvp/Explainer.mdvendor/wasmtime/ - a Wasm runtime with WASI P3 supportvendor/wasm-tools/ - the Wasm toolchain the Wado compiler builds onvendor/antlr4/ - ANTLR4, the grammar dialect Gale targets. Read
package-gale/AGENTS.md first: most of this tree must not be readvendor/wasi-webgpu/ - the wasi:webgpu proposalvendor/protobuf-spec/ - protobuf.dev's source, which is the protobuf spec
vendor/protobuf-spec/content/programming-guides/encoding.md.proto grammar, one file per syntax and edition:
vendor/protobuf-spec/content/reference/protobuf/{proto2,proto3,edition-2023,edition-2024}-spec.mdvendor/protobuf-spec/content/editions/features.mdvendor/protobuf/ - protocolbuffers/protobuf, for the .proto files the spec
does not carry: src/google/protobuf/descriptor.proto, the well-known types,
and the unittest*.proto / test_messages_*.proto Grog parses as a corpusgit submodule update --init --recommend-shallow fetches them.
mise run sync-vendor
vendor/wasmtime goes to the exact version in Cargo.lock, which WASI P3
compatibility requires. The other submodules go to their remote HEAD.
To test a change to wasmtime itself, edit vendor/wasmtime in place and add to
the workspace Cargo.toml:
[patch.crates-io]
wasmtime = { path = "vendor/wasmtime/crates/wasmtime" }
wasmtime-wasi = { path = "vendor/wasmtime/crates/wasi" }
wasmtime-wasi-http = { path = "vendor/wasmtime/crates/wasi-http" }
wasmtime-wasi-tls = { path = "vendor/wasmtime/crates/wasi-tls" }
Those four names redirect 31 crates. The cranelift-*, pulley-*,
wasmtime-internal-* and wiggle* crates follow through the dependency graph.
sync-vendor already holds the submodule at the Cargo.lock version, so the
sources match what the workspace expects and nothing needs porting.
Keep the stanza on a throwaway branch. CI checks out without submodules
(submodules: false, also actions/checkout's default), so on main every job
dies while parsing the manifest. Landing it means turning submodule checkout on
across every workflow.
reference/ holds patches written this way, each with its measurement:
current_thread_split.patch — splits the cold deferred-frame replay out of
StoreOpaque::current_thread so the fast path inlines. Removes ~1 point of
CPU; throughput flat.trace_fiber_roots.patch — tracks fiber-owning reps instead of scanning the
whole component ResourceTable per GC. Not measurable.まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。
まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。
Measure Wado's performance or the size of the Wasm it generates, and refresh the benchmark/ and wasm-size/ README files. Use for any benchmarking or size-measurement request, whichever benchmark it names.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Measure how long GitHub Actions jobs and steps took across past runs, and find the pull request that made CI slower. Use for any question about CI duration, a slow job, or when CI got slow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How to answer code review feedback — a human reviewer, CodeRabbit, or any review bot. Verify the findings, report the classes they are instances of to the user before fixing, then fix the class rather than the sites named. Put design decisions to the user, then run /distill. Invoke when responding to review comments on a pull request, or to the findings of a /code-review run.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate and improve code coverage for the wado-compiler crate. Use for any question about what the tests do and do not reach, dead code included.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review the branch with /code-review at high, then answer the findings with /code-review-response.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use rust-gdb to inspect variables and step through code without modifying it. Prefer it over print debugging for any investigation into what the compiler is actually doing (lldb is unavailable on Claude Code Web).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。