Use this skill to maintain a compliant DOT accident register. Covers § 390.15 requirements, what's recorded, retention period.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user asks how to build, measure, or improve safety culture in a motor carrier — leading vs lagging safety indicators, blame-free reporting, near-miss programs, safety committee structure, monthly safety meetings, ATA Safety Management Program guidance, and how to evaluate cultural maturity. Reference ATA SMP + DOT safety culture research.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
A carrier's compliance score (CSA / BASIC) is a lagging indicator of safety. Safety culture is the upstream cause — and it's malleable. This skill covers what builds + measures safety culture.
The goal is to drive leading indicators positive — lagging follows.
ATA + DOT research identifies a maturity scale:
| Level | Description |
|---|---|
| 1. Pathological | "Why waste our time on safety?" Compliance only when caught. |
| 2. Reactive | "Safety is important, AFTER an accident." Address incidents but no prevention. |
| 3. Calculative | "We have systems to manage all identified risks." Procedures + audits. |
| 4. Proactive | "Safety leadership at all levels; we anticipate problems." |
| 5. Generative | "Safety is how we do business. It's in our culture." High retention + low incident rates. |
Most carriers operate at Level 2-3. Top-decile carriers are at Level 4-5. Improvement is measurable + worthwhile.
Monthly safety meeting structure (60 min):
Make it engaging — invite drivers' experiences, ask questions, vary speakers.
For carriers > 50 drivers:
Committee meets monthly, makes safety-related decisions, has budget authority (within limits).
A near-miss is an incident that COULD have been an accident but wasn't. Examples:
Reporting these BEFORE they become crashes is highly predictive of safety culture.
Carrier should:
A fleet with high near-miss reporting + low actual accident rate = strong culture.
For a near-miss program to work, drivers must believe they won't be punished for reporting.
Practical implementation:
The hardest part: building trust. Takes 6-24 months of consistent behavior.
Tools:
A safety culture survey of 50 drivers asking:
The aggregate scores across years tells the story.
After observing a safety issue (telematics data, customer complaint, driver self-report):
Don't:
X3's scorecards.html surfaces driver-level + fleet-level safety culture metrics. The Risk Index blends compliance, behavior, and outcomes into a single signal. incidents.html supports near-miss reporting (drivers + dispatchers can flag).
Quarterly safety culture reports could be a useful X3 feature for customers — survey drivers, aggregate scores, benchmark to industry.
The AI-powered DOT compliance platform for fleets 1–100 power units. Try a 7-day free trial — no credit card required — at https://x3compass.com/?utm_source=skill&utm_medium=github&utm_campaign=safety-culture-and-management
X3 Compass turns these skills into a complete operational platform: driver qualification files, drug & alcohol consortium, MVR pulls, hours-of-service tracking, hazmat shipping, IFTA filing, FMCSA audit prep, and DataQ dispute drafting — all CFR-cited, all in one place.
This skill is published under the X3 Compass open skills initiative. Contributions welcome at https://github.com/x3fleetsafety/skills
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use this skill to maintain a compliant DOT accident register. Covers § 390.15 requirements, what's recorded, retention period.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to investigate a crash effectively. Covers preservation of evidence, witness statements, dashcam review, and reporting timeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to document crashes that don't qualify as DOT-recordable. Covers what to track, why it matters, and insurance/CSA implications.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to handle the subrogation and claim process after a crash. Covers when subrogation applies, how to pursue it, and timeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user asks about accident claims management — first-notice-of-loss procedures, working with insurance adjusters, claim severity classification, subrogation, claim closure timelines, and how to influence claim outcomes. Different from accident-investigation-playbook (which covers facts); this covers the insurance + claim side.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user asks how to investigate a CMV accident — what to do at the scene, the first 24 hours, evidence preservation, who to call, preventability determination, ELD data preservation, dash cam review, witness interviews, working with insurance + attorney, and how to build a learning culture from incidents. Reference 49 CFR 392.7 + insurance industry best practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。