调研、论文、教育、考证学习（4417 个）
Use before writing custom code or a research workflow when a maintained library, tool, skill, or proven pattern may already exist. Start with local reuse and targeted evidence; broaden to external research for new dependencies, new mechanisms, or uncertain external facts.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Fierce autonomous internal co-founder. Bounded web research for evidence-backed improvements. Structured idea formulation with self-critique filter that rejects ideas not serving the goal. Auto-implements high-confidence aligned improvements, proposes medium-confidence ideas for approval. Evaluates viral coefficient, AI search visibility (GEO), and solo SaaS economics. Considers higher pursuits: employing disabled people, spiritual tech investigation, 99% wealth donation ethos.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Research what people have discussed in the last 30 days across high-signal public platforms. Use when the user asks for `/last30days`, recent trend research, competitive intelligence, market pulse briefs, or engagement-ranked synthesis from Reddit, Hacker News, GitHub, X, YouTube, Polymarket, and similar sources.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Broad, pre-curation evidence reconnaissance for a declared Gaia skill, intake batch, upstream repository, or proposed generic capability. Run before choosing a discovery strategy or mapping topology, to give the curator independent research leads and counterevidence. Context only: never scores, grades, ratifies, ingests, or mutates the registry. Later ev-discovery and ev-pipeline phases validate/promote any selected leads.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Turn a verified Salesforce research packet into a concise, role-aware learning brief with clear objectives, concept sequencing, worked examples, release caveats, checks for understanding, and citations mapped to claims. Trigger keywords: teach me Salesforce, explain Salesforce concept, create learning brief, Salesforce study guide, role-based lesson. NOT for open-ended source discovery or freshness verification — use architect/salesforce-learning-research first. NOT for generating production metadata or changing an org.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Chart a too-big effort as a shared map of decision tickets on the Gaia headquarters issue tracker, then resolve them one at a time until the way to the destination is clear. Use when someone says: "this is too big for one session", "chart a map", "wayfinder map", "plan this effort", "what do we need to decide first", "open a wayfinder", "work the map", "what's on the frontier", or /wayfinder. Covers any gaia-research org repo — gaia-skill-tree, gaia-research, gaia-skill-heaven and beyond — but every map and every ticket lives on ONE tracker: gaia-research/gaia-skill-tree. This is cartography (planning an effort as decisions), NOT triage of an existing backlog — for that use /gaia-triage.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Triage the Gaia issue backlog and skill-batch intake queue. Use this skill when someone asks to: "triage issues", "clean up the issue tracker", "review the backlog", "close stale issues", "process the intake queue", "review skill-batches", "evaluate draft skill proposals", "approve or reject pending skills", "is this issue still valid?", "what's clogging the backlog?", "run a triage pass", or /gaia-triage. Covers two workstreams: (1) GitHub issue lifecycle — identifying resolved, stale, or need-more-info issues and acting on them via gh CLI; (2) skill-batch intake — evaluating draft proposals in registry-for-review/skill-batches/ and routing them toward promotion or rejection. This is the gatekeeping step before new skills enter the canonical registry; and (3) a cross-repo triage sweep — sizing, P0-P4 prioritization, umbrella/epic synthesis, and assignment across every gaia-research org repo, on the one headquarters tracker.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Fuse all of a contributor's named skills into a single fusion node (suite capstone) in the registry. Use when the user says "fuse <contributor>'s skills", "create a suite for <contributor>", "build a capstone for <user>", "fuse all of <user>'s named skills", "create a suite fusion", "consolidate <contributor> into one skill", or explicitly types /gaia-fuse-full-suite. Also triggers when a contributor has accumulated 3+ named skills and the user asks what to do next with them, or when someone asks "can we make a suite from these?". This skill: collects component IDs from registry/named/<contributor>/, verifies nodes exist, researches evidence and appraises Trust Magnitude, runs `gaia dev fuse` to write the fusion node and suite manifest, validates, and opens a PR on a review/meta/ branch.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
End-to-end plan → implement → review pipeline that takes one triaged Gaia issue to a merged-ready PR, with Kill Criteria on the issue and zero follow-up debt. Use when someone says: "resolve this issue", "take #N end-to-end", "work the P0 queue", "fix and ship this issue", "run the resolver", "close out this issue properly", or /gaia-issue-resolver. Works any gaia-research org repo — gaia-skill-tree, gaia-research, gaia-skill-heaven — while the issue itself lives on the headquarters tracker, gaia-research/gaia-skill-tree. Assumes the issue is already triaged and carries a P0–P4 label; if it does not, run /gaia-triage first.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Skippable Phase 0 of the Gaia evidence verification pipeline. Use only on declared need for higher-quality Stage-2 evidence: a promotion candidate, or a skill that gaia-meta-sweep flagged as under-evidenced. Given a skill id, source repo/context, and needed evidence types (benchmark-result, arxiv, peer-review, social-signal), it runs Firecrawl searches, scrapes top hits to markdown, and appends discovered sources into Phase 1 inputs. Missing benchmark evidence is recorded as benchmark-source candidates first, not direct scoring rows. Trigger phrases: "discover evidence", "find new evidence", "Phase 0", "run ev-discovery", "search for benchmarks/papers", "under-evidenced", "promotion candidate needs stronger proof". This is the ONLY ev-* skill that searches the web for NEW evidence; other ev-* skills aggregate or verify known sources. Requires Firecrawl to be usable (`firecrawl --status` authenticated OR FIRECRAWL_API_KEY set); skips gracefully when neither holds.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Walks a user through connecting the judge models this plugin can use — Codex, OpenCode, OpenRouter (or any compatible endpoint: 9router, z.ai, Moonshot), Gemini — and through picking models, including "research current models for me". Use for "multi setup", "set up multi", "configure judges/reviewers/ backends", "connect 9router", "change/pick models", "onboarding", or whenever a probe shows missing backends and the user needs to know what to do about it.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when the user wants to be taught an Anthropic product or feature - "teach me Claude Code", "learn Cowork", "academy lesson", "train me on MCP or the Claude API", "quiz me", "next lesson" - or asks for structured learning rather than a one-off answer. Covers Claude Code, Claude.ai, Cowork, Tag, Platform/API, and AI Fluency. Do NOT use for auditing how the user already works (use academy-review) or for mid-task help where the user just wants their task done.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Reverse engineers binaries using radare2/rizin interactively, covering analysis initialization, navigation, disassembly and graph views, patching, and the visual mode workflow. Activates for requests to reverse a binary with radare2 or rizin, learn r2 commands, or navigate and disassemble a sample in r2.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Captures and analyzes malware network traffic from a detonation: extracting C2 endpoints, HTTP/DNS patterns, TLS metadata (JA3/SNI), and beaconing from a PCAP to build network IOCs and detection. Activates for requests to analyze malware PCAP, extract C2 from traffic, or study network behavior.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Analyzes how a ransomware sample encrypts files: identifying the crypto scheme (symmetric/asymmetric/hybrid), key handling, file targeting and extension/marker changes, shadow-copy deletion, and ransom-note artifacts. Activates for requests to analyze ransomware encryption, assess decryptability, or study ransomware behavior.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Research a topic and save findings to vault
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Research topic by searching vault and synthesizing findings
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Evidence-first academic research workflow for topic ideation, scholarly search, paper reading, literature and systematic reviews, study and experiment design, statistics and data analysis, scientific figures, manuscript drafting and polishing, citation checks, peer review, rebuttals, submission packages, theses, and paper-to-presentation work. Use when an agent must plan, execute, audit, write, revise, or package research while keeping claims traceable to verified sources, data, analysis, or official requirements.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Write and revise rigorous research narratives, literature reviews, manuscript sections, citations, and figure discussions. Use for technical introductions, methods, results, discussions, review articles, abstracts, or related-work sections.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Develop research proposals with solicitation alignment, reviewer-focused logic, evidence-bounded preliminary results, milestones, risks, and compelling figures. Use for federal, foundation, equipment, partnership, or internal research proposals.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Apply source-aware mechanical-engineering judgment to research, analysis, coding, writing, teaching, research identity, and release work. Use for thermal-fluid systems, heat transfer, fluid mechanics, thermodynamics, HVAC, energy systems, turbomachinery, piping, multiphase flow, experiments, correlations, CFD, reduced-order models, AI/ML, uncertainty, engineering datasets, literature reviews, citations, manuscripts, reviewer revisions, Overleaf packages, figures, proposals, research software, reproducibility, public releases, engineering teaching materials, or a research-project logo and visual identity.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Provide constructive, evidence-based research mentoring feedback on student manuscripts, proposals, analyses, code, figures, and presentations. Use for advisor-style review that teaches the next improvement without impersonating an advisor or making unsupported scientific judgments.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a tenure-track/tenured Education Professor in a teacher-preparation program — designing a licensure course unit against InTASC/CAEP standards, deciding whether a candidate's borderline edTPA score needs a targeted or full retake, triaging a failing student-teaching placement, or assembling CAEP self-study evidence for reaccreditation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a K-12 Education Administrator (principal/assistant principal/district administrator) — making a school-level policy or resource-allocation decision, handling a discipline or safety incident, evaluating a curriculum or staffing decision, or balancing competing demands from teachers, parents, students, and district requirements.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。