调研与学习技能

Design comparative drug safety studies using FAERS, the FDA’s adverse event reporting database, within one defined safety area. The plan compares drugs or classes, lays out workload options and analysis steps, and distinguishes detected signals from conclusions the data cannot support.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Comparing drug classes within one adverse event area
• Planning a FAERS study with active comparators
• Adding declared subgroup or onset characterization

Turns computational, omics, biomarker, genetic, or clinical findings into a staged cell and animal validation plan. It defines the claim, suitable model families, perturbations, controls, readouts, and workload options while marking feasibility assumptions and limits on interpretation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Plan wet-lab follow-up for a computational finding
• Choose cell or animal model families for a specific claim
• Set perturbations, controls, readouts, and experiment order

Build a traceable pool of candidate biomedical papers across databases. The skill adapts search logic to each source, preserves record metadata, labels evidence types such as preprints and trials, and organizes results for later deduplication and screening without treating candidates as final inclusions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Collect candidate papers across biomedical databases
• Build database-specific search strategies for a research question
• Prepare a traceable literature pool for deduplication and screening

Turn a biomedical research idea into a structured bulk omics study plan. It clarifies the research question, suggests suitable study patterns and analysis methods, lays out validation and deliverables, and compares four workload levels while marking unverified data assumptions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Planning a bulk RNA-seq, proteomics, or metabolomics study
• Comparing Lite, Standard, Advanced, and Publication+ plans
• Designing a biomarker or subtype study with validation steps

Map biomarkers in a disease area by type, specimen, use case, validation, and maturity. The structured evidence map distinguishes exploratory signals from externally validated or clinically embedded markers, and highlights limitations and gaps without treating popularity as proof of clinical readiness.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Mapping biomarker evidence by disease and intended use
• Comparing validation and maturity across biomarker classes
• Finding under-validated areas in a research field

Scan biomedical and biological preprints from bioRxiv, medRxiv, and arXiv to map active topics, emerging methods, and early research signals. Get a structured landscape report with source and freshness caveats, plus search terms for independent verification.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Checking recent preprints in a biomedical research area
• Tracking shifts in competitor research or methods
• Scanning topic momentum before writing an introduction or grant

Turn a basic biomedical finding into a structured map of possible clinical or therapeutic uses. Compare the evidence, feasibility, and gaps for each path, then identify a defensible next research direction without treating an early finding as clinically ready.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Mapping clinical uses for a disease mechanism finding
• Comparing biomarker and therapeutic research paths
• Finding evidence gaps between basic research and clinical use

Read a research paper figure by figure to map each visual to the claim it is meant to support. Separate what is shown from interpretation, judge the strength of the evidence, and flag conclusions that go beyond the available figures.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Quickly understand a paper’s main findings from its figures
• Check whether figures support the authors’ central claims
• Reconstruct a paper’s argument in figure order

Plan a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study using public GWAS summary statistics for multiple exposure and outcome traits. The skill compares four workload levels and structures instrument filtering, primary and sensitivity analyses, multiple-testing control, validation, and interpretation with limits on causal claims.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Planning bidirectional MR across disease groups
• Designing subtype-level analyses with public GWAS data
• Comparing study workload and sensitivity checks

Shape an early or overly broad clinical or biomedical idea into a bounded, searchable, and testable research question. Identify missing elements, choose a fitting framework such as PICO or a mechanism-based structure, and suggest the next research step without answering the substantive question.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Narrowing a broad biomedical topic before searching literature
• Framing a clinical idea as a researchable question
• Choosing between PICO and other question frameworks

Maps a biomedical topic into research streams, populations, endpoints, methods, and evidence density. It highlights well-covered and thin areas and suggests possible entry points, while keeping those observations separate from formal research gaps or study plans.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Getting oriented in an unfamiliar biomedical topic
• Mapping evidence before a formal gap analysis
• Structuring a topic before a scoping review

Assess whether a biomedical research area is truly saturated or only busy on the surface. It organizes evidence about repeated study designs, validation depth, and major groups, then maps meaningful entry angles and the timing and feasibility of pursuing them.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Checking whether a popular disease research topic is still open
• Comparing crowded study designs with less explored research angles
• Assessing whether a research project can be differentiated

Drafts or revises a grant application's Specific Aims page or an NSF Project Summary from a study idea, hypothesis, and supporting evidence. It helps organize the problem, research gap, aims, expected outcomes, and impact into the required opening structure.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Draft an NIH R01 Specific Aims page
• Shape a testable hypothesis into grant aims
• Prepare an NSF Project Summary

Turn existing biomedical figures, analyses, and result notes into a clear Results section outline. It orders primary and supporting findings, separates validation from mechanistic support, reduces repetition, and flags missing information or places where citations may be needed.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Ordering figures and findings for a manuscript
• Separating primary results from supporting analyses
• Restructuring a fragmented Results section

Check a biomedical manuscript against reporting frameworks such as CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, or TRIPOD. The review identifies missing or weakly reported items, distinguishes major gaps from minor issues, and prioritizes corrections while flagging when more manuscript material is needed.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Check a trial paper against CONSORT
• Find missing reporting items before submission
• Review a manuscript for STROBE or PRISMA gaps

Review a manuscript before arXiv submission for unverifiable references, leftover AI prompts or comments, placeholders, consistency issues, disclosure concerns, and moderation risks. The skill produces a located fix list and readiness report without judging authorship from writing style or rewriting claims.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Checking a LaTeX paper before arXiv upload
• Verifying BibTeX references and citation keys
• Scanning for leftover AI prompts or placeholders

Draft or revise the Methods section of a biomedical paper from a study protocol, analysis details, or existing text. It checks coverage against study reporting guidelines, aligns methods with reported results, and can adapt wording to a journal’s structure and word limit.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Writing a Methods section from a study protocol
• Revising a biomedical manuscript’s Methods text
• Checking Methods coverage against CONSORT or STROBE

Reviews whether manuscript claims are supported by the cited sources. It flags mismatches, overstatements, paraphrase drift, and possible second-hand citations, ranks concerns by severity, and identifies where more source material is needed for a reliable judgment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Checking citations in an introduction or discussion
• Finding claims that exceed their cited evidence
• Reviewing possible second-hand citations

Review an academic paper, plan revisions, or prepare responses to reviewer comments through staged work cycles. It estimates the workload, reviews contribution, rigor, writing, and editorial fit, then creates a prioritized revision backlog and exports reports.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Review a manuscript and prioritize its main issues
• Plan revision work after receiving reviewer comments
• Estimate the effort for a paper revision

Turn reviewer or editor comments into structured, point-by-point response drafts. The skill classifies each issue as acceptance, explanation, rebuttal, or additional analysis, links replies to actual manuscript changes, and flags unresolved requests or missing revision context.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Drafting point-by-point replies to reviewer comments
• Turning revision notes into a response letter
• Linking replies to manuscript changes and figures

Find realistic journal targets for a biomedical manuscript by weighing its topic, study design, evidence strength, and practical constraints. Get tiered candidates, fit analysis, a primary recommendation, and a next step after rejection.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Choosing journals for a new manuscript
• Comparing a journal’s scope and method fit
• Finding a next target after rejection

Turn clarified research into a structured plain-language summary for colleagues outside the field. It highlights the study goal, what was studied, key findings, evidence limits, and practical next steps, with wording adapted to clinical, lab, computational, product, or management audiences.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Explain research findings to a mixed-discipline team
• Prepare a non-technical study summary for colleagues
• Clarify what different teams should do with a finding

Search official sources, technology media, and community discussions for information on new products and technologies. Cross-check findings, note their dates and sources, and save an organized summary in a knowledge base.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Checking recent details about a new product
• Comparing information across several source types
• Saving sourced technology research for future use

Run structured web research and save findings to a dated Markdown note as searches progress. The final brief organizes key facts with source links, confidence levels, unresolved questions, and writing suggestions for later work.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Researching background for an article
• Tracking findings across several web searches
• Preparing a sourced brief for later writing