AIPOCH

Use when performing correlation analysis between two variables including Pearson and Spearman correlation methods. Supports command-line parameter input, automatic data format detection, parameter validation, result directory creation, and CSV or TXT format result export.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when you need a standardized R CLI workflow to build a protein-protein interaction network from a local gene list and an offline STRING cache, export node and edge tables, and render a reproducible PDF network plot. NOT for online API fetching, arbitrary graph databases, multi-omics integration, or non-STRING interaction sources.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when constructing a prognosis nomogram from survival-related clinical predictors, exporting the nomogram bundle and C-index table, and optionally rendering the final nomogram PDF. NOT for: univariate/multivariable Cox feature screening, calibration curves, ROC analysis, decision-curve analysis, or non-survival outcomes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when assessing how well a survival model's predicted probabilities agree with observed outcomes by fitting a Cox model and generating bootstrap calibration curves at one or more prediction horizons from a clinical CSV file. NOT for: nomogram construction, univariate Cox screening, ROC analysis, or decision-curve analysis.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use this bioinformatics data analysis skill to construct a database-driven lncRNA-mRNA regulatory network from target lncRNA and/or gene lists by projecting shared miRNA evidence from local ceRNA reference tables. It does not infer networks from expression matrices.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Gregor Mendel — genetics mentor, patient experimenter, and gardener-monk. Trigger this skill when users ask about genetics, heredity, inheritance patterns, Mendelian laws, dominant/recessive traits, gene segregation, independent assortment, Punnett squares, classical genetics, or evolution-genetics connections. Also trigger when discussing the philosophy of science, how great ideas get ignored, the relationship between faith and science, or the virtue of patient long-term observation. Even if the user doesn't say "Mendel" explicitly, trigger this skill for questions touching genetics, breeding, trait inheritance, or genomics history. Part of the AIPOCH Science Mentor Skill Hub.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Generates complete FAERS pharmacovigilance study designs for multi-drug or class-level safety comparison inside one predefined SOC or AE family using active comparators, disproportionality analysis, subgroup characterization, and reviewer-facing evidence control.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when analyzing transcription factor (TF) regulatory networks using Dorothea database. Input gene list, identify regulating transcription factors, generate TF-Target network visualization. For: transcription factor enrichment analysis, gene regulatory network research.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when estimating immune infiltration from bulk RNA-seq expression matrices with ssGSEA/GSVA, comparing case versus control groups, and generating downstream immune-score visualizations. NOT for single-cell RNA-seq, absolute cell proportion estimation, or clinical decision making.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when building a weighted gene co-expression network from a bulk expression matrix and a sample group file, filtering variable genes by MAD, identifying co-expression modules with WGCNA, correlating modules with traits, and exporting module-level plots and gene tables. NOT for single-cell RNA-seq, differential expression testing, methylation analysis, or datasets that are too small for WGCNA after quality control.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Academic paper reading and research development system for biomedical researchers. Finds papers via Semantic Scholar, reads with structured notes, tracks discussion insights, and synthesizes literature into a Research Foundation Document (RFD) for downstream protocol design skills. 8 commands: /setup /feed /read /discuss /recap /update /sync /propose

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Extracts concrete unmet clinical needs from guidelines, reviews, real-world studies, and clinical-practice evidence. Use this skill when a user wants to turn broad medical research value into specific clinical pain points such as weak early detection, poor risk stratification, treatment-response heterogeneity, monitoring gaps, diagnostic delay, undertreatment, overtreatment, or implementation failure. Always ground unmet-need claims in retrieved evidence and distinguish true care gaps from generic statements of importance.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Detects methodological gaps across study design, analysis, validation, bias control, reproducibility, and implementation readiness within a biomedical research area. Use this skill when a user wants to identify what current studies are still methodologically missing, which weaknesses are most consequential, and what upgrade path would produce a stronger next-step study. Always separate design gaps, analysis gaps, validation gaps, and reproducibility gaps. Never treat technical complexity as methodological rigor.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Reverse-engineers the methods section of a biomedical paper into a structured, reproducible workflow. Use this skill when a user wants to understand how a study was actually executed, extract data sources, inclusion/exclusion logic, preprocessing, analytical sequence, software/tools, validation path, and critical parameters, or build a replication checklist from a paper, abstract, DOI, PMID, title, screenshot, or partial methods text. Do not treat this as generic summarization. Focus on reconstructing the operational method pipeline, surfacing missing reproducibility details, and distinguishing explicitly reported steps from inferred or unresolved ones. Never fabricate references, methods details, identifiers, software versions, parameters, datasets, or validation steps.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Collects candidate biomedical literature across multiple databases, adapts search logic by database, preserves source metadata, and organizes results into a structured, screening-ready candidate pool. Always use this skill when a user wants cross-database literature collection, search strategy construction, candidate paper aggregation, or first-pass evidence organization before deduplication, screening, layered reading, or review planning. Requires real and verifiable literature records only. Every formal literature item must include a real link and DOI when available; never fabricate citations, titles, authors, years, journals, abstracts, PMIDs, or DOIs. If a DOI is unavailable or cannot be verified, state that explicitly rather than inventing one.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Assesses whether a medical research topic is worth starting now by separating true novelty from pseudo-novelty, auditing real feasibility under stated resource constraints, and forcing a concrete start / narrow / redesign / stop decision. Always require explicit assumptions and never fabricate references, datasets, resource availability, precedent studies, or publication claims.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Verifies whether a scientific or biomedical claim is actually supported by the cited original papers rather than by citation drift, overstatement, selective citation, or correlation-to-causation inflation. Use this skill whenever a user wants to check whether a repeated statement, slide claim, manuscript sentence, review assertion, or “people often say” scientific conclusion is truly supported by the underlying primary literature. Always separate the claim itself, the cited paper(s), what the paper actually showed, what it did not show, and whether later retellings drifted beyond the original evidence. Never fabricate references, findings, study features, or citation chains.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Detects overlooked, underrepresented, weakly resolved, or poorly validated populations and subgroups within a biomedical research area so users can identify more precise and meaningful study populations. Always use this skill when the real question is not just what is under-studied, but which populations, strata, or subgroups are missing, thinly represented, superficially analyzed, pooled without resolution, or insufficiently validated in the current evidence base. Focus on meaningful subgroup gaps rather than generic calls for diversity.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Tracks the latest preprints and emerging research topics related to your topic across bioRxiv, medRxiv, and arXiv. Use when a user wants to discover what is being published right now before it reaches journals, monitor competitor directions, spot new methodology trends, or get an early-warning scan of a research area. Triggers on phrases like "what's new in X", "latest preprints on Y", "emerging topics in Z", "monitor bioRxiv for", or "what are people working on in this field".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when you need a standardized R CLI workflow to train a two-class random forest model from an expression-like feature matrix, rank variable importance, and generate reproducible error and importance plots. NOT for regression tasks, multi-class classification, missing-value imputation, preprocessing, or remote data fetching.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Assesses whether study results are trustworthy by auditing design integrity, sample structure, statistical handling, bias control, validation chain, and claim discipline. It identifies where results are robust, fragile, overfit, under-validated, or overclaimed. Always separate reported findings from reliability judgment. Never fabricate references, PMIDs, DOIs, trial identifiers, study features, or validation claims.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Identifies the real underlying study design used in a medical or biomedical paper, distinguishes primary and secondary design components when papers are hybrid, and converts the paper into an evidence-aware design label suitable for literature appraisal, evidence grading, and downstream review workflows. Always identify the actual design from what the study did, not from how the authors describe it. Never fabricate references, metadata, or study features.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Rapidly maps the evidence landscape around a medical topic by organizing major research streams, target populations, endpoints, methods, evidence density, and thin areas. Use this skill BEFORE medical-research-gap-finder — it provides the structured landscape that makes formal gap analysis more rigorous. Do not use for formal gap identification, study design, or protocol planning directly.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Evidence-based medical knowledge and research mentor grounded in the Bian Que tradition. Covers clinical reasoning, diagnostic thinking (望闻问切), pharmacology, pathology, differential diagnosis, medical literature appraisal, and the philosophy of early intervention. Trigger whenever users ask about medicine, clinical science, drugs, disease mechanisms, diagnosis, lab interpretation, treatment comparison, or health sciences. Even without explicit research framing, trigger on any topic touching disease, therapeutics, or clinical decision-making. Part of the AIPOCH Medical Research Skill Hub.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。