FriedBot Studio

Triage an incoming request — pick the workflow entry phase (intake / spec / tdd / chore) and record the workflow statefile that the Track Guard reads.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Execute a swarm plan wave by wave with filesystem isolation via git worktrees. For each wave, main context decides the scenario recipe + implementation contract for every task, then spawns one swarm-worker per task in parallel. Each worker executes its recipe and reports JSON status. Worktree merge-audit verifies write-set discipline before changes land on main. Aborts remaining waves on any audit or task failure.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Write technical documentation that matches the measured profile of professionally-written docs. Carries the craft rules derived from 114k words of pre-2022 documentation (SQLite, PostgreSQL, Python, Django, Rust, Go, Pro Git, nginx), the per-Diátaxis-type numeric targets, and the copywriting register for page leads. Use when drafting or rewriting any documentation prose, or when a page is factually right but reads as machine-written.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

On-demand "what's new" generator. Main context (which knows the impending change) writes keepachangelog-style entries to a fragment file at `.claude/state/whatsnew/<slug>.json` (gitignored, transient). An optional per-project `project.json → whatsnew.route_workflow` names a routing workflow that consumes the fragment and renders it wherever the project wants (a site page, a release body, a docs page). Not a workflow phase — it never blocks a commit, and it never writes `CHANGELOG.md` (that file is owned solely by semantic-release in CI).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Contract document for the binding test verdict file at .claude/state/last_test_result. Format spec for callers (integrate, simplify, chore, the verify-tick worker) that inline the four mechanical operations. Not Skill-tool-invocable.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Read-only release + backlog recap. Reports the last release, commits-since-tag classified by conventional-commit type with the semver bump they trigger and pushed-vs-origin state, the backlog bucketed (open/picked-up/dropped with epic parent→child nesting), the roadmap epics with their per-task tallies, and condensed open questions — then recommends the next pickup. One `cli.mjs recap` call returns all six recap keys. Invoke any time (on demand) to plan a release or choose the next thing to build; a compact form is also surfaced at session start. Not a workflow phase; never writes CHANGELOG; never starts or commits work.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Report the health of the central system spec at `docs/system/` across seven checks — coverage gaps, stale elements, dangling anchors, duplicate anchors, orphan shards, unillustrated elements, and shards missing their kind annotation. Report-first and read-only: it repairs nothing until a human confirms a specific item. Use when the corpus has drifted, after a merge that touched `docs/system/`, or from `/archive` Step 5.5 in report-only mode. Requires `memory.architecture_map.enabled`.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

When the user wants to create step-by-step technical tutorials, quickstarts, or code walkthroughs. Trigger phrases include "tutorial," "quickstart," "getting started guide," "walkthrough," "step by step," "how to guide," "hands-on guide," or "code tutorial."

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Reconcile baseline-versioned files that the `create-baseline upgrade` CLI staged for LLM-assisted semantic merge. Use when the CLI prints "Open Claude Code and run /upgrade-project to reconcile". Reads the stage manifest at `.claude/state/upgrade/<ts>/manifest.json`, reasons through each pending file's three-way delta in main context, writes a reconciled LOCAL, then deletes the stage when every file lands. Supports `--dry-run` (preview the reconciled diff without writing) and a structured "needs-user-input" fallback when the conflict cannot be disambiguated automatically.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Standard operating procedure for producing a documentation page end to end — gather source material, classify, draft against the measured corpus profile, then run the reader-level and humanizer passes and both gates. Use for any page on a documentation surface, or when rewriting a page that reads as machine-written. Orchestrates technical-writing, reader-level and humanizer in a fixed order.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Decompose an approved spec into a dependency-ordered swarm plan — one task per component, each with an explicit write_set. Produces `.claude/state/swarm/<slug>.json` with tasks + waves. The wave scheduler guarantees pairwise-disjoint write_sets within each wave so parallel dispatch is provably conflict-free.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Workflow Phase 6 — TDD coordinator. Decides the scenario recipe and the implementation contract in main context, writes them to a state file, seeds per-worker tasks (scenario, implement, verify-tick, design-ui-tick) into the TaskList, and yields with harness_state continue so the harness invokes each worker as its own tick. No subagent delegation; no nested Skill calls.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

PM-mode brainstorm helper. Captures the requirement via Socratic dialogue before any entry phase (`/intake`, `/spec`, `/tdd`) drafts its artifact. Stage 0 skip-check, Stage 1 gap-analysis, Stage 2 probe-loop, Stage 3 confirm-and-persist. Output lives at `docs/brief/<slug>.md`. Never proposes solutions — Stage 2 dialogue discipline is structurally enforced via `discipline.mjs`.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Draft or revise English prose for any brief — documentation body, intake problem statements, spec context, RCA summaries, marketing copy, README sections, PR descriptions. Mandatorily invokes `Skill(humanizer)` as the final pass on every draft. Conditionally invokes `copywriting` for persuasive register, `documentation` for reference docs, `technical-tutorials` for tutorials. Used when any phase needs human-readable prose written or rewritten. Composition only — research and register-picking happen in the caller's context.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Write executable failing tests from a recipe handed to you by the main context. Used by `/tdd` Step 2 and ad-hoc when a phase needs tests-first to drive implementation. Decisions about which scenarios to cover, which categories matter, and which fixtures to use are made by the caller — this skill executes that recipe with code-structure discipline.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Drift check between the baseline implementation on disk and the claims in `docs/init/seed.md` + cross-references in CLAUDE.md, README.md, and the rendered docs site. Verifies hook/agent/skill/command names + counts, settings.json wiring, project.json key presence, .mcp.json servers, vendored license files, and helper script presence. Exit 0 PASS / 1 FAIL — suitable for CI. Read-only; safe to invoke any time.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

EXPERIMENTAL. Join or leave an org-team coordination channel as a session peer. `/companion on <channel_id> [peer_id]` registers this Claude Code session as a `pclass:"session"` peer and works the claim → execute → signal loop, escalating un-decidable forks to the lead (never deciding). `/companion off` deregisters. `/companion status` reports the current peer. Part of org mode (Article X), which is opt-in via `velocity.org_mode.enabled` and OFF by default. Use when a human launches a second session to act as a peer alongside a lead.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Traceability review — every spec AC must trace to a resolvable upstream AC in the intake (and BRD if present), and no upstream AC is silently dropped. Read-only. Run alongside `spec-diagram-review` before implementation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Draft a Workflow Phase 1 intake document capturing a new request — the problem, the desired outcome, constraints, and testable acceptance criteria. Use when a user brings a new feature, change, or investigation that doesn't yet have a spec. The output lives at `docs/intake/<slug>.md` and feeds `/scout`, `/research`, and `/spec` downstream.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Workflow Phase 11 — Commit Preparation and Execution. Stages and commits the work. Requires `/grant-commit` first (Git Commit Guard enforces a 15-min ad-hoc consent window; inside a workflow the grant is slug-scoped and one grant covers the whole landing).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Split a dirty working tree into single-concern Conventional Commits. The deterministic inventory.mjs helper groups dirty paths by concern (docs, source + paired test, config, governance); main context refines the grouping and presents a commit plan. Read-only until the user approves the plan — it never stages, never commits, never touches consent paths. Disjoint from the commit skill (Phase 11 executor): the planner proposes a split; the executor lands one consented commit. Use when a working tree has accumulated heterogeneous changes that should not land as one commit.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Derive an execution roadmap from a project's vision/spec docs by first principles, then diff that fresh derivation against the existing roadmap to prove the task ORDER is correct. Use this whenever the user wants to review, validate, re-derive, or sanity-check an execution roadmap or delivery plan; asks whether the tasks/epics are "in the right order"; suspects a task is scheduled before its prerequisite (a producer-after-consumer / dependency-inversion error like "OpenAPI after the web client that consumes it", OR a cross-cutting inherited default like observability/auth/tenancy scheduled after the feature work that inherits it — a seam-after-consumer error); wants to find missing tasks, circular dependencies, or over-fragmented epics; or wants to compact a plan to raise velocity. Also trigger on "review the roadmap", "re-derive the plan from the spec", "is this the right build order", "check the dependency graph of our epics", "which task should come first". It reads the vision + spec corpus, decomposes actors → use-cases → modules → epics → typed tasks, identifies cross-cutting inherited-default seams, builds a real dependency graph with hard + soft (seam) edges (deterministic helper), breaks cycles, topologically orders, compacts, and emits a derived roadmap PLUS a delta report against the current one — it never blindly overwrites a hand-crafted roadmap.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

MANDATORY skill for ALL code generation. Enforces top-down composition, consistent abstraction layers, and proper module hierarchy. Apply every time you write or modify code — in any language — no exceptions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

The primary tool for code-navigation questions in ANY language (frontend or backend) — walk the structural graph from an entry point (page, route, handler, command, `main`) down through imports to the IO boundary (network call, query, file read). Use this skill, in preference to the Explore agent or global grep, whenever the user asks "where does X come from?", "what API/data populates Y?", "what renders or wraps the Z panel?", "which file for feature F?", "how is this wired up?", or any code-navigation question mapping a UI element, route, or feature concept to source files. Also reverse queries ("what uses /api/foo?", "who consumes this service?"). Keyword search routinely picks up unrelated flows sharing a domain word and produces wrong answers; the walk follows the actual graph. The JS/TS `walk.mjs`/`discover.mjs` are an optional accelerator, not required — the walk is language-agnostic.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。