FriedBot Studio

Decompose an MVP vision into a sprint manifest — a prioritized feature list where every feature carries explicit done-criteria (a done-record reference, named edge tests, and a wiring test). Produces the sprint manifest that `sprint-oracle` checks for completeness. Use when planning a sprint of parallel work (Slice A of the sprint-mode epic). Not a workflow phase; the manifest it writes is the completeness contract a sprint is held to.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Propose the next dependency-ready sprint from the ALREADY-DECOMPOSED roadmap — standup's active sibling. Reads docs/roadmap-execution-plan.md + the memory backlog, computes per-task readiness from the roadmap's machine-readable status, orders with roadmap-planner's graph engine, and emits a proposed task-set (sprint-plan manifest shape) with per-feature done-criteria, excluding unready tasks and naming their unmet prerequisite. PROPOSES ONLY — the human confirms/edits before /triage routes it (typically to the `power` track). Distinct from `sprint-plan`, which decomposes a fresh vision.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Bring documentation prose down to a high-school reading level without losing precision. Runs after the content is written and before humanizer. Targets grade 9 on four measures — sentence length, vocabulary, clause load and jargon density — and carries the rewriting moves that actually shift them.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Phase 10.6 — sync the project's execution roadmap (project.json → roadmap.path, default docs/roadmap-execution-plan.md) to the just-landed work. Flips the tasks named in workflow.json → roadmap_tasks[] from ⬜ to ✅ and promotes their epic headings ⬜→🟡→✅, preserving the standup parser format contract. On the epic track it appends instead — the epic's heading plus one row per slice — and stamps roadmap_epic back into the epic state. Also hosts the ad-hoc backfill that puts every epic already on disk onto the roadmap. Fail-open: never throws, no-ops when roadmap.path is unset/absent or no task matches, and never blocks a commit. Runs after /archive and before /memory-sync on every committing track.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Draft a Workflow Phase 1 intake document capturing a new request — the problem, the desired outcome, constraints, and testable acceptance criteria. Use when a user brings a new feature, change, or investigation that doesn't yet have a spec. The output lives at `docs/intake/<slug>.md` and feeds `/scout`, `/research`, and `/spec` downstream.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Workflow Phase 8 (optional) — OWASP-aligned security review of pending code changes. Produces a prioritized findings report (Critical/High/Medium/Low) mapped to OWASP Top 10 and CWE IDs. Output at `docs/security/<slug>-<date>.md`. Read-only.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Write executable failing tests from a recipe handed to you by the main context. Used by `/tdd` Step 2 and ad-hoc when a phase needs tests-first to drive implementation. Decisions about which scenarios to cover, which categories matter, and which fixtures to use are made by the caller — this skill executes that recipe with code-structure discipline.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Cross-consistency review of a drafted spec's diagrams. Verifies that C4 components appear in the dependency graph, class-diagram changes have matching DDL, every AC resolves to a concrete sequence, and the dependency graph is acyclic. Read-only. Run after `/spec-lint` passes and before implementation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Phase 10.5 — move the slug's workflow artifacts (intake, scout, research, spec, approvals, swarm state, security reports, rendered diagrams) to docs/archive/<YYYY-MM-DD>/<slug>/. Runs before /commit so the committed tree is clean of work-in-flight files. workflow.json stays live and gets archived as the first step of /commit.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Derive an execution roadmap from a project's vision/spec docs by first principles, then diff that fresh derivation against the existing roadmap to prove the task ORDER is correct. Use this whenever the user wants to review, validate, re-derive, or sanity-check an execution roadmap or delivery plan; asks whether the tasks/epics are "in the right order"; suspects a task is scheduled before its prerequisite (a producer-after-consumer / dependency-inversion error like "OpenAPI after the web client that consumes it", OR a cross-cutting inherited default like observability/auth/tenancy scheduled after the feature work that inherits it — a seam-after-consumer error); wants to find missing tasks, circular dependencies, or over-fragmented epics; or wants to compact a plan to raise velocity. Also trigger on "review the roadmap", "re-derive the plan from the spec", "is this the right build order", "check the dependency graph of our epics", "which task should come first". It reads the vision + spec corpus, decomposes actors → use-cases → modules → epics → typed tasks, identifies cross-cutting inherited-default seams, builds a real dependency graph with hard + soft (seam) edges (deterministic helper), breaks cycles, topologically orders, compacts, and emits a derived roadmap PLUS a delta report against the current one — it never blindly overwrites a hand-crafted roadmap.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Traceability review — every spec AC must trace to a resolvable upstream AC in the intake (and BRD if present), and no upstream AC is silently dropped. Read-only. Run alongside `spec-diagram-review` before implementation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Drift check between the baseline implementation on disk and the claims in `docs/init/seed.md` + cross-references in CLAUDE.md, README.md, and the rendered docs site. Verifies hook/agent/skill/command names + counts, settings.json wiring, project.json key presence, .mcp.json servers, vendored license files, and helper script presence. Exit 0 PASS / 1 FAIL — suitable for CI. Read-only; safe to invoke any time.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Draft or revise English prose for any brief — documentation body, intake problem statements, spec context, RCA summaries, marketing copy, README sections, PR descriptions. Mandatorily invokes `Skill(humanizer)` as the final pass on every draft. Conditionally invokes `copywriting` for persuasive register, `documentation` for reference docs, `technical-tutorials` for tutorials. Used when any phase needs human-readable prose written or rewritten. Composition only — research and register-picking happen in the caller's context.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

PM-mode brainstorm helper. Captures the requirement via Socratic dialogue before any entry phase (`/intake`, `/spec`, `/tdd`) drafts its artifact. Stage 0 skip-check, Stage 1 gap-analysis, Stage 2 probe-loop, Stage 3 confirm-and-persist. Output lives at `docs/brief/<slug>.md`. Never proposes solutions — Stage 2 dialogue discipline is structurally enforced via `discipline.mjs`.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。