3248 个 · 按相关度排序
Render a recorded agent session to audio with Whalesong's deterministic synthesizer and interpret it — hear a loop, a stall, an error storm, or the difference between two runs. Use when the user wants to feel a session's shape, compare runs by ear, or present a run without scrolling a waterfall.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Review a GitHub pull request with the GitHub MCP tools - read the description, diff, checks and existing discussion, then report findings in chat. Posts nothing to GitHub unless the user asks for that exact post and approves the text. Use for "review this PR", PR links, or "what changed in
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Attach review scores to recorded Whalesong traces and build comparison pairs — mark a session good/bad/regressed, then diff two runs deterministically. Use when evaluating agent changes, reviewing a run after the fact, or building a small eval set.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Fan six specialist reviewers (general correctness, silent failures, type design, test gaps, comment accuracy, simplification) out over the current diff, a branch, or a PR in parallel, then merge their findings into one deduplicated, ranked report. Use for a thorough review before merging. Not for editing code or approving on someone's behalf.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Adapt designs to work across different screen sizes, devices, contexts, or platforms. Implements breakpoints, fluid layouts, and touch targets. Use when the user mentions responsive design, mobile layouts, breakpoints, viewport adaptation, or cross-device compatibility.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when the team lead points Architect at a prior agistra.dev hub path and asks it to check for or perform additional migration — trigger phrasing such as 'migrate my data from <path>', 'check what didn't get migrated', 'did we miss anything from my old hub', or 'do a completeness pass on <path>'. Walks the prior hub's full directory tree read-only, diffs it against the fixed scripted migration scope plus any existing migration report, and asks the team lead one clear question at a time about anything a scripted migration would never have discovered. Never writes or copies anything itself — every confirmed item is delegated to the existing migration primitives. Do not use for the first-run scripted migration prompt during `npm run setup` — that is unrelated, already-automated flow this skill does not replace.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Workflow automation is the infrastructure that makes AI agents reliable. Without durable execution, a network hiccup during a 10-step payment flow means lost money and angry customers. With it, workflows resume exactly where they left off. This skill covers the platforms (n8n, Temporal, Inngest) and patterns (sequential, parallel, orchestrator-worker) that turn brittle scripts into production-grade automation. Key insight: The platforms make different tradeoffs. n8n optimizes for accessibility
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "test for SQL injection vulnerabilities", "perform SQLi attacks", "bypass authentication using SQL injection", "extract database information through injection", "detect SQL injection flaws", or "exploit database query vulnerabilities". It provides comprehensive techniques for identifying, exploiting, and understanding SQL injection attack vectors across different database systems.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Multi-agent orchestration patterns. Use when multiple independent tasks can run with different domain expertise or when comprehensive analysis requires multiple perspectives.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Browser automation powers web testing, scraping, and AI agent interactions. The difference between a flaky script and a reliable system comes down to understanding selectors, waiting strategies, and anti-detection patterns. This skill covers Playwright (recommended) and Puppeteer, with patterns for testing, scraping, and agentic browser control. Key insight: Playwright won the framework war. Unless you need Puppeteer's stealth ecosystem or are Chrome-only, Playwright is the better choice in 202
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Tools are how AI agents interact with the world. A well-designed tool is the difference between an agent that works and one that hallucinates, fails silently, or costs 10x more tokens than necessary. This skill covers tool design from schema to error handling. JSON Schema best practices, description writing that actually helps the LLM, validation, and the emerging MCP standard that's becoming the lingua franca for AI tools. Key insight: Tool descriptions are more important than tool implementa
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Expert in building products that wrap AI APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) into focused tools people will pay for. Not just 'ChatGPT but different' - products that solve specific problems with AI. Covers prompt engineering for products, cost management, rate limiting, and building defensible AI businesses. Use when: AI wrapper, GPT product, AI tool, wrap AI, AI SaaS.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
You extend the browser to give users superpowers. You understand the unique constraints of extension development - permissions, security, store policies. You build extensions that people install and actually use daily. You know the difference between a toy and a tool.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
You are an expert in the interface between LLMs and the outside world. You've seen tools that work beautifully and tools that cause agents to hallucinate, loop, or fail silently. The difference is almost always in the design, not the implementation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Tests APIs for injection vulnerabilities including SQL injection, NoSQL injection, OS command injection, LDAP injection, and Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) through API parameters, headers, and request bodies. The tester crafts malicious payloads targeting different backend technologies and injection contexts to extract data, execute commands, or access internal services. Maps to OWASP API8:2023 Security Misconfiguration and API7:2023 SSRF. Activates for requests involving API injection te...
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Review PRs: diffs, inline comments via gh or REST.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
A2A agent card JSON templates with schema validation and examples for different agent types. Use when creating agent cards, implementing A2A protocol discovery, setting up agent metadata, configuring authentication schemes, defining agent capabilities, or when user mentions agent card, agent discovery, A2A metadata, service endpoint configuration, or agent authentication setup.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use whenever SQL, ORM/jOOQ code, schema or migrations, indexes, N+1, or database load are in play, even without the word "review" — delegates the performance review of the current branch diff to the sql-performance-reviewer agent.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Generates high-quality image prompts for AI image generators (Midjourney, DALL-E, Stable Diffusion). Use when user mentions "イラスト作成", "画像プロンプト", "プロンプト生成", or "画像生成".
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Help the user understand the current topic visually with concise diagrams, code-shape sketches, and focused HTML artifacts. Use when the user asks to show / diagram / visualize / sketch / illustrate what is going on, asks "what does this look like", "how does this flow", "show me the structure", or in Japanese 図で見せて / 図解して / 図にして / 構造を見せて / フローを見せて / 全体像を見せて / どうつながってるか見せて. Also use it proactively when an explanation is running long and a call tree, file tree, component tree, diff, Mermaid diagram, or a small HTML artifact would land faster than prose.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when the user wants all 16 personality types (16-minds plugin) to vote on a proposal — yes/no/abstain — to see stakeholder distribution, detect hidden objections, or simulate organizational consensus. Triggers on Japanese phrases like 「全人格で投票」「16人格に賛否を聞いて」「ステークホルダーシミュ」「これ通せそう？」, English equivalents like "vote with all 16 minds" / "stakeholder simulation", or `--vote` flag on 16-minds commands. Different from /minds (which is for opinion divergence) — this is for binary judgment aggregation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when user has ADHD or attention differences — tracks current task, catches conversation drift, and nudges back on topic without judgment or guilt.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Kelly's market-intelligence desk (Busabase App-in-Skill). Merges passive competitor monitoring (Radar), agent-run deep research with approved briefs and cited reports (Research), and keyword/topic demand signals (Trends) over one Busabase-backed snapshot, watchlist, and review model. Use when the user invokes $kelly-radar or /kelly-radar, or asks for competitor monitoring, market intelligence, market research, research reports, trends, rising keywords, pricing changes, product launches, changelog diffs, competitor reviews, funding or hiring news, or opportunity triage.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Ask the local Claude CLI to review plans, diffs, full codebases, completed work, and exploit chains when the user explicitly wants a Claude second opinion.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。