跳到正文
cccskills

“correctness”的搜索结果

415 个 · 按相关度排序

Use ONLY when the user asks to check, validate, review or audit analysis code for scientific correctness, or when you are the reviewer agent running its checks. Never run it unprompted as part of ordinary analysis work. Covers physics, earth/geo, biology, chemistry, social science and bioprocess/fermentation. Runs a deterministic domain-correctness gate that catches code which runs but is scientifically wrong (unit/dimension mismatch, Euclidean distance on lat/lon without a CRS, 0-based/1-based coordinate and strand errors, impossible SMILES valence, uncorrected multiple comparisons, averaging a categorical code, unconstrained kinetic-parameter fits, kLa computed from raw DO instead of the driving force, arithmetic mean of raw CFU counts, ANOVA/Tukey with no assumption check, a curvature DOE design fit with a first-order model, an ML model fit across process scales with no correction). Surfaces structured findings; never claims the code is correct.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

ai4s-research/open-science19292026年10月14日 更新

Comprehensive adversarial audit of a theory, proof, math/econ paper, codebase, or set of claims — decompose into components, fan out independent skeptics that must return CONCRETE defects, adjudicate every finding with a separate judge, fix all confirmed defects, then re-verify. Use when correctness must be bulletproof and single-pass or round-by-round review is too slow and too shallow. Invoke for "audit this rigorously", "find ALL the bugs/gaps", "make this rock solid", "converge faster on correctness".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow16642026年9月28日 更新

Audit code for correctness and rigor — logic errors, silent error swallowing, wishful thinking, and unjustified fallbacks. This is not a style review; it's a logic review. Use when you want a focused correctness audit separate from the full code-police pass.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

srid/emanote9652026年7月26日 更新

Re-ingest-correctness SOP for production RAG. Activate when a calling agent builds, reviews, or debugs an ingestion pipeline that runs more than once over a changing corpus — scheduled re-index, incremental updates, CI re-ingest, or a "retrieval has duplicates / shows deleted docs" bug. Encodes the rule — **ingestion must be idempotent: a document's content hash decides insert/update/skip, so re-running over unchanged docs is a no-op** — plus the docstore + doc-hash upsert machinery (LlamaIndex `IngestionPipeline` + `DocstoreStrategy`), the delete-propagation problem, and cross-framework equivalents (LangChain `index()` + `RecordManager`, manual hash table). ENHANCE overlay over [[llamaindex]]: the IngestionPipeline exists in the base skill but the re-ingest-correctness contract is not surfaced.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

agentsope/SkillAlchemy4352026年10月9日 更新

Verify code correctness statically against specifications using type checking, contract verification, and formal methods. Use when: (1) Verifying type safety and null safety in Python, Java, or C/C++ code, (2) Checking design-by-contract specifications (preconditions, postconditions, invariants), (3) Validating code against formal specifications, (4) Ensuring code quality and correctness before runtime, (5) Finding potential bugs through static analysis. Supports Python (mypy, contracts), Java (javac, JML), and provides verification scripts and contract specification guidelines.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

ArabelaTso/Skills-4-SE2562026年8月21日 更新

Generate executable code together with formal proofs certifying safety and correctness properties in Isabelle/HOL or Coq. Use when building verified software, safety-critical systems, or when formal guarantees are required. Produces code with accompanying proofs for memory safety, bounds checking, functional correctness, invariant preservation, and termination. Supports extraction to OCaml/Haskell/SML and integration with existing codebases.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

ArabelaTso/Skills-4-SE2562026年8月21日 更新

Audit code for correctness and rigor — logic errors, silent error swallowing, wishful thinking, and unjustified fallbacks. This is not a style review; it's a logic review. Use when you want a focused correctness audit separate from the full code-police pass.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

srid/haskell-flake2412026年10月18日 更新

音乐制作 / 混音 (音乐制作 / 混音 (Music Production & Mixing) — 录音棚与卧室工作室里把一首歌从编曲/录音/编程做到混音/母带成品的工程+艺术认知操作系统,面向制作人(producer)、混音师(mixing engineer)、母带工程师(mastering engineer)、beatmaker、唱作人/bedroom producer,以及想入行/服务这行(录音棚、plugin 厂商、sample 公司)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — **服务歌曲/情绪 (serve the song / emotion-first: 技术只为打动人,'if it sounds good it is good',用耳朵不用眼睛) ⇄ 技术正确/工程纪律 (technical correctness: gain staging 增益结构、headroom 余量、相位 phase、监听校准、LUFS 响度规范)**; **黄金耳朵/直觉混音 (mix by ears, reference-driven, 不看分析仪) ⇄ 看表/分析仪/规则 (mix by metrics: EQ 曲线、频谱仪 spectrum analyzer、相关计 correlation meter)**; **少即是多/减法混音 (subtractive, 'less is more', 录好源头 = 混音成功一半) ⇄ 重度处理/'we'll fix it in the mix' (heavy processing, 后期补救)**; **In-the-box 全数字 (ITB: DAW + 插件,召回方便,bedroom 可达专业) ⇄ 模拟硬件/outboard (analog console + 硬件,'mojo'/谐波染色 vs 召回噩梦)**; **人性化/groove/不完美 (humanize, push/pull, 'the feel') ⇄ 量化/网格/修音 (quantize to grid, pitch-correct, 'in the pocket' 靠编辑)**; (b) 核心工作流 / pipeline (最标准、最易蒸高质量+CLI 化) — 编曲制作 arrangement/production → 录音/编程 tracking/programming → 编辑 editing (comping 选段/quantize/pitch-correct/time-align) → 混音 mixing (gain staging → balance 平衡 → EQ → compression → 空间 reverb/delay → 自动化 automation → 总线/母线处理 bus/mix-bus) → 母带 mastering (响度/EQ/限制 limiting/dither/排序+间隔) → 交付 delivery (DDP/streaming spec/stems); (c) 工具栈 — DAW (Pro Tools 录音棚标准/Ableton Live 电子+现场/Logic Pro Mac 性价比/FL Studio beatmaker/Cubase/Studio One/Reaper); 插件 (EQ: FabFilter Pro-Q/SSL/API; 压缩: 1176/LA-2A/SSL bus comp 及其复刻 Waves/UAD/Plugin Alliance; 混响: Valhalla/Lexicon/Bricasti; 调音: Auto-Tune/Melodyne; 限制器 limiter: Pro-L 2/Ozone); 硬件 (监听音箱 monitors: Yamaha NS-10/Genelec; 声学处理 acoustic treatment; 转换器 converters: Apollo/RME; 话筒 mics: U47/SM7B/57); 采样/音色 (Splice/sample packs/Kontakt/Serum 合成器); (d) 知识正典 — Mixing Secrets for the Small Studio (Mike Senior)、The Mixing Engineer's Handbook / Recording Engineer's Handbook (Bobby Owsinski)、Zen and the Art of Mixing (Mixerman)、The Art of Mixing (David Gibson 可视化)、Modern Recording Techniques、Sound on Sound 杂志、Mix With The Masters 大师课、Pensado's Place; (e) figures/流派 — 混音大师 (Chris Lord-Alge CLA 摇滚/Andrew Scheps 'Stadium' 3-bus/Tony Maserati/Manny Marroquin/Serban Ghenea 流行隐形混音/Michael Brauer multing); 制作人 (Rick Rubin 减法/氛围、Quincy Jones、Dr. Dre 完美主义、Max Martin 流行结构、Jack Antonoff、Finneas bedroom→Grammy、Metro Boomin/trap、Timbaland、Pharrell); 母带 (Bob Katz K-system/响度战争批判、Bob Ludwig、Greg Calbi); 教育者 (Mike Senior、Pensado、Warren Huart Produce Like A Pro、Dan Worrall 技术深挖); (f) 行业话术/黑话 — gain staging/headroom/LUFS/true peak/comping/bouncing/printing/stems/DI/reamp/sidechain/parallel compression 并行压缩/mid-side/bus/aux/send-return/dry-wet/transient/sibilance/de-ess/pumping/mud 浑浊/harsh 刺耳/boxy/muddy/in the pocket/the pocket/quantize/swing/groove/vibe/mojo/reference track/A/B/recall/print/glue 胶水; (g) 争议/批判 — 响度战争 loudness war (Bob Katz/Loudness Penalty/streaming 归一化 LUFS 终结了吗)、修音/Auto-Tune 之争 (artistic vs cheating)、ITB vs 模拟玄学 (硬件 'warmth' 是否安慰剂、null test 盲测)、preset/AI 混音 (iZotope/LANDR/sample-based 是否毁了 craft)、bedroom producer 民主化 vs 录音棚消亡、'loudness'/over-compression、plugin 复刻 vs 真硬件、Spotify normalization 对母带的影响、过度依赖 reference/抄袭; (h) 创意 vs 技术张力是本行业 deep tacit 知识的核心 — 大量隐性 '听感' 知识难以言传,靠 reference/学徒/千小时积累。不含: 现场扩声 live sound/PA、音乐理论/作曲 composition (虽相关但聚焦录音棚后期制作)、配乐/film scoring (虽相关但聚焦歌曲制作)、纯硬件电子工程/合成器 DIY、音乐商业/版权/发行 (虽相关但聚焦制作技艺本身)。) Master OS — automated mastery of 音乐制作 / 混音 (Music Production & Mixing) — 录音棚与卧室工作室里把一首歌从编曲/录音/编程做到混音/母带成品的工程+艺术认知操作系统,面向制作人(producer)、混音师(mixing engineer)、母带工程师(mastering engineer)、beatmaker、唱作人/bedroom producer,以及想入行/服务这行(录音棚、plugin 厂商、sample 公司)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — **服务歌曲/情绪 (serve the song / emotion-first: 技术只为打动人,'if it sounds good it is good',用耳朵不用眼睛) ⇄ 技术正确/工程纪律 (technical correctness: gain staging 增益结构、headroom 余量、相位 phase、监听校准、LUFS 响度规范)**; **黄金耳朵/直觉混音 (mix by ears, reference-driven, 不看分析仪) ⇄ 看表/分析仪/规则 (mix by metrics: EQ 曲线、频谱仪 spectrum analyzer、相关计 correlation meter)**; **少即是多/减法混音 (subtractive, 'less is more', 录好源头 = 混音成功一半) ⇄ 重度处理/'we'll fix it i

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

swaylq/master-skill1622026年9月6日 更新

Use when reviewing, debugging, or improving frontend code in this repo (website/ HTML, CSS, JS, service workers, PWA assets) or when asked to "review frontend", "revisa el html/css", "review JS", or "audita el frontend". Reviews for correctness, browser compatibility, accessibility, performance, security (XSS), responsive behavior, and PWA/service-worker correctness, and ends with a "what a user/reviewer would catch" pass.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

sazardev/networking-with-go592026年8月8日 更新

Audit code for correctness and rigor — logic errors, silent error swallowing, wishful thinking, and unjustified fallbacks. This is not a style review; it's a logic review. Use when you want a focused correctness audit separate from the full code-police pass.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

srid/drishti282026年10月16日 更新

Unity New Input System correctness patterns. Catches common mistakes with action reading (triggered vs IsPressed vs WasPressedThisFrame), action map switching, rebinding persistence, InputValue lifetime, PassThrough vs Value, local multiplayer device assignment, and control scheme auto-switching. PATTERN format: WHEN/WRONG/RIGHT/GOTCHA. Based on Unity 6.3 LTS.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

IdoCohen560/claude-unity-game-studio222026年7月8日 更新

Audit code for correctness and rigor — logic errors, silent error swallowing, wishful thinking, and unjustified fallbacks. This is not a style review; it's a logic review. Use when you want a focused correctness audit separate from the full code-police pass.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

juspay/vira202026年5月15日 更新

Quantitative agent evaluation using 4-metric framework (correctness/step_ratio/tool_call_ratio/latency_ratio) with ideal trajectory annotation and capability-categorical taxonomy. Use when measuring agent efficiency, comparing agent variants, or gating new agents through correctness→efficiency phases. Complements harness-eval (SE benchmarks) and evaluator-optimizer (qualitative rubric).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

baekenough/second-brain152026年10月8日 更新

Verifies bug fixes are correct and complete by tracing callers, checking imports/exports, validating path resolution, and confirming no regressions. Does the code work? Use when reviewing code changes for functional correctness.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

AndrewBrown-USDA/aigb-skills-usda72026年10月16日 更新

コード品質の最終確認。Skill: code-review (built-in) で correctness bug を検出 → main agent が findings を修正 → lint/ty 静的解析 → 条件付きで security-reviewer / critic を spawn (security 関連変更 or plan/requirements.md がある時のみ)。「品質チェックして」「品質ゲート通して」「レビューして」「コードを確認して」「PR 出す前にチェック」「セキュリティ大丈夫?」「コード見て」で発動。

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

kok1eee/o-m-cc62026年6月9日 更新

rea-analysis-optimization

免费有简介AI 评分 90分

审查REA的分析流程与缓存设计,在保持结果正确性和依据可访问性的同时,改善耗时、CPU与内存使用,以及智能体需要处理的信息量。

  • 调查分析流程缓慢的原因
  • 审查缓存设计
  • 降低CPU和内存负载
morluto/rea34万2026年10月20日 更新

rea-ci-tests-audit

免费有简介AI 评分 90分

审查REA的CI与测试集,验证是否存在漏报缺陷的判定或测试数据偏差,并依据实际测量结果,在保留必要缺陷检测能力的前提下评估运行成本。

  • 调查漏报缺陷的CI判定
  • 核对测试数据与当前规范的差异
  • 测量缓慢测试集中的无效开销
morluto/rea34万2026年10月20日 更新

Organize a task into parallel work streams with clear dependencies, separate places for changes, and explicit checks. Batch independent reads and tests, coordinate concurrent work, and report completed or blocked tasks with verification results.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Batching independent file reads and searches
  • Splitting implementation across multiple agents
  • Separating changes with Git worktrees
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月20日 更新

data-throughput-accelerator

免费有简介AI 评分 90分

分阶段排查大量数据导入、历史补录、转换和同步的耗时,比较处理方法并加速,在执行后核对文件数、行数与时间戳的一致性,形成可重复使用的流程。

  • 加速大量数据导入与导出
  • 缩短历史数据补录时间
  • 比较批次大小与并行任务数
affaan-m/ECC28.4万2026年10月20日 更新

ponytail-gain

免费有简介AI 评分 100分

用文字条形图展示Ponytail 5公开基准测试中的代码量、输出词元、费用、时间及检查结果,对比未使用技能的情况,不计算当前项目的节省量。

  • 查看公开的代码量与费用对比
  • 查看正确性和测试相关测量结果
  • 同时查看测量条件与结果
DietrichGebert/ponytail16.8万2026年10月18日 更新

doubt-driven-development

免费有简介AI 评分 90分

将设计或实现中的重要决策交给不继承工作过程的独立审查者验证,找出隐藏前提和失败条件,再据此修正问题或重新评估决策。

  • 验证设计方案的前提
  • 检查陌生代码中的决策
  • 审查认证与敏感处理逻辑
addyosmani/agent-skills10.9万2026年10月14日 更新

source-driven-development

免费有简介AI 评分 90分

检查项目所用框架和库的版本,依据对应的官方文档实现代码,为设计决策提供来源链接,并标明已弃用的 API、未验证的方法及与现有代码的冲突。

  • 依据所用版本的官方文档核对实现
  • 创建附有来源的代码模板
  • 检查代码是否使用已弃用的 API
addyosmani/agent-skills10.9万2026年10月14日 更新

code-review-and-quality

免费有简介AI 评分 90分

在合并前从正确性、可读性、架构、安全和性能五个维度审查代码变更,检查测试是否恰当,区分必须修复的问题与可选建议,并提出具体改进方法。

  • 合并前审查拉取请求
  • 检查人工智能编写的代码
  • 评估重构是否带来改善
addyosmani/agent-skills10.9万2026年10月14日 更新

Measure code performance and run benchmarks to investigate slow operations, regressions, or memory pressure. Establish a baseline, compare results under matching conditions, report variability, and rerun correctness tests after optimization.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Investigate slow operations
  • Compare performance before and after a change
  • Measure performance when memory pressure occurs
ruvnet/ruflo7.7万2026年10月19日 更新