238 个 · 按相关度排序
Review dependency manifests and lockfiles to find outdated packages and known security vulnerabilities. Group proposed updates by version change, report current and suggested versions, and identify updates that need human review.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Investigate how a limited Linux account could gain root, the system administrator's privileges. The skill guides checks of permissions, scheduled tasks, services, and known vulnerabilities, while outlining evidence defenders can monitor during authorized security assessments.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Evaluate older Wi-Fi clients and embedded devices for KRACK and FragAttacks vulnerabilities. Covers test suites, likely patch status, practical impact, and reporting findings by device, firmware version, and vulnerability identifier.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Complete security architecture overhaul for claude-flow v3. Addresses critical CVEs (CVE-1, CVE-2, CVE-3) and implements secure-by-default patterns. Use for security-first v3 implementation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
CVE lookup and triage — map discovered services/versions to known CVEs via the cve_lookup tool, score by CVSS/exploitability, and prioritize what to verify first.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
CVE validation domain card. Use after CVE lookup has produced applicable or candidate CVEs and red-team mode needs scoped evidence to decide whether to continue, pivot, or report.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Audit a Python project's installed dependencies for known CVEs by wrapping pip-audit (PyPA's official vulnerability auditor) and emitting findings in the canonical penetration-tester schema. Detects vulnerable direct AND transitive packages, normalizes pip-audit's severity output via OSV severity bands, falls back to pip list --outdated when pip-audit isn't installed, and supports requirements.txt, pyproject.toml (PEP 621), Pipfile.lock, and poetry.lock as input sources. Use when: pre-merge gate on a Python project, post-incident sweep after a PyPI compromise (e.g. ctx, request-toolbelt typosquats, ultralytics 8.3.42 compromise), SOC2 evidence collection, or inheriting an unfamiliar Python codebase. Threshold: any HIGH or CRITICAL CVE in the resolved dependency tree. MODERATE / LOW reported informationally. Trigger with: "audit python deps", "pip vulnerability scan", "check pypi packages for CVEs", "pip-audit run".
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Audit a Node.js project's installed npm dependency tree for known CVEs by wrapping the npm audit JSON output and emitting findings in the canonical penetration-tester schema. Detects direct AND transitive vulnerabilities, normalizes npm's severity scale (info/low/moderate/ high/critical) to the shared Severity enum, and parses both v1 and v2 audit output formats so the skill works against npm 6 and npm 7+ lockfiles. Use when: pre-merge gate on a Node project, post-incident sweep after a transitive package compromise (e.g. event-stream, ua-parser, node-ipc, color.js), SOC2 vendor-management evidence collection, or auditing an inherited or acquired Node codebase. Threshold: any HIGH or CRITICAL CVE in the resolved dependency tree. MODERATE / LOW reported informationally. Trigger with: "audit npm deps", "npm vulnerability scan", "check node packages for CVEs", "npm audit".
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Build safe, local, defensive reproductions of ALREADY-PATCHED, publicly disclosed security vulnerabilities (CVEs, vendor advisories, AI-agent incidents) for whitepapers, control testing, and education. Use this skill whenever the user wants to reproduce, demonstrate, or write up a known vulnerability or security incident — phrases like "reproduce this CVE", "build a repro for", "demonstrate the EchoLeak/Cursor/postmark-mcp issue", "show how this exploit worked", "add a reproducibility guide", or "pull the NVD/CVE details for". It fetches advisory metadata from NVD and CVE.org, confirms the issue is fixed, and produces a vulnerable-vs-patched harness that is offline, loopback-only, and uses synthetic markers. It NEVER discovers, develops, or weaponizes new zero-days and refuses any unpatched or live-target request.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
End-to-end methodology for reproducing AND patching publicly disclosed, already-fixed vulnerabilities: sourcing the advisory and the fix commit, reading the patch diff, rebuilding a pinned offline lab, building a vulnerable-vs-patched contrast harness with proper controls, minimizing the trigger, designing and validating the fix, and writing it up as a blog post or whitepaper. Use this skill whenever the user wants to reproduce, demonstrate, understand, teach, or write about a known vulnerability or security incident: "reproduce this CVE", "build a repro for", "how did EchoLeak / Log4Shell / the postmark-mcp package actually work", "show me how this exploit worked", "write a blog post about this vulnerability", "set up a lab for CVE-XXXX", "pull the NVD/CVE/OSV details", or "make a PoC I can publish". Use it just as eagerly for the patching half: "how should this be fixed", "is this patch correct", "what would have caught this", "review this security fix", "write a regression test for this CVE", "how do I backport this", or "what's the right fix for this bug class" - even when the user never says the word "reproduce". Reach for it on vague asks like "help me understand this security advisory", "I want to write about this incident", or "can we test whether we were vulnerable" when a disclosed vulnerability is in play. This skill only handles ALREADY-PATCHED, publicly disclosed issues and refuses zero-day discovery, live targets, and weaponization.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when drafting, updating, or reviewing an S2-XXX security bulletin on the Struts cwiki, when preparing bulletin text ahead of a CVE request, when filling a CVE record in the ASF CVE tool (cveprocess.apache.org / Vulnogram), when deciding when to publish, when publishing a bulletin and announcing it to the ASF lists, when wrapping up after the advisory mails, or when deciding how much detail about a fixed vulnerability is safe to publish.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Complete security architecture overhaul for claude-flow v3. Addresses critical CVEs (CVE-1, CVE-2, CVE-3) and implements secure-by-default patterns. Use for security-first v3 implementation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Complete security architecture overhaul for claude-flow v3. Addresses critical CVEs (CVE-1, CVE-2, CVE-3) and implements secure-by-default patterns. Use for security-first v3 implementation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Complete security architecture overhaul for claude-flow v3. Addresses critical CVEs (CVE-1, CVE-2, CVE-3) and implements secure-by-default patterns. Use for security-first v3 implementation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Complete security architecture overhaul for claude-flow v3. Addresses critical CVEs (CVE-1, CVE-2, CVE-3) and implements secure-by-default patterns. Use for security-first v3 implementation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Linux local privilege escalation from a low-privilege shell to root. Covers quiet vs loud enumeration, sudo/GTFOBins, CVE-2025-32463 chwoot and CVE-2025-32462 host bypass, polkit/udisks CVE-2025-6018/6019, SUID/capabilities, systemd timers/units, cron/PATH/LD_PRELOAD, dangerous groups and docker.sock, host-local container escape, and version-gated kernel LPE including Copy Fail CVE-2026-31431. Use when the operator has a Linux foothold and needs root. Kubernetes RBAC stays in /k8s. Endpoint blocks hand off to /edr-bypass then return here.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Complete security architecture overhaul for claude-flow v3. Addresses critical CVEs (CVE-1, CVE-2, CVE-3) and implements secure-by-default patterns. Use for security-first v3 implementation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Comprehensive Linux privilege escalation methodology for offensive security engagements. Covers the full attack surface from a low-privilege shell to root: SUID/SGID binary abuse via GTFOBins, Linux capabilities exploitation (cap_setuid, cap_dac_override, cap_dac_read_search), sudo misconfigurations including NOPASSWD rules and Baron Samedit (CVE-2021-3156), cron job abuse through writable scripts, PATH hijacking, and wildcard injection with tar/rsync/chown. Includes writable /etc/passwd attacks, NFS no_root_squash exploitation, kernel exploits (DirtyPipe CVE-2022-0847, DirtyCow CVE-2016-5195, PwnKit CVE-2021-4034), Docker group container escapes, LD_PRELOAD and LD_LIBRARY_PATH hijacking for shared library injection, systemd service misconfigurations, and sensitive file enumeration for credential harvesting. Integrates automated enumeration with LinPEAS, linux-exploit-suggester, pspy for process monitoring, and GTFOBins for binary exploitation. Each technique includes detection signatures and defender-sid...
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Complete security architecture overhaul for claude-flow v3. Addresses critical CVEs (CVE-1, CVE-2, CVE-3) and implements secure-by-default patterns. Use for security-first v3 implementation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Check single-cell RNA-seq data quality, filter low-quality cells using median absolute deviation, a measure of spread, and compare plots before and after filtering. Outputs include filtered data and the original dataset with quality annotations.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Checks application code, dependencies, and security controls to identify vulnerabilities and plan fixes. Includes Python scanners, reports, incident response workflows, and guidance for adding security checks to CI/CD, the automated build and deployment process.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Review source code, dependencies, and infrastructure settings for security issues. Find exposed credentials, unsafe input handling, and access control gaps, then organize findings into a report with severity levels, affected locations, and recommended fixes.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Assess Docker, containerd, and Podman environments for weaknesses that could expose the host system. The skill organizes checks for excessive permissions, exposed runtime sockets, and known vulnerabilities, alongside indicators defenders can monitor.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Investigate SQL injection in search forms, filters, and APIs by choosing tests based on actual responses. The skill covers visible query results, response differences, and timing evidence, helping produce reproducible reports with concrete data impact.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。