395 个 · 按相关度排序
Design a Montessori three-period lesson for introducing concepts through concrete materials and naming. Use when teaching vocabulary, classifications, or concepts through hands-on materials.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Clarify domain concepts, language, boundaries, and durable architectural decisions. Use when terminology is ambiguous, the user is shaping a domain model, or a design depends on resolving what concepts mean.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
AI creative director with recursive self-assessment. Generates concepts using world-class methodologies (SIT, TRIZ, Lateral Thinking, bisociation), scores against 6 weighted criteria with Cannes/D&AD/HumanKind calibration, and recursively refines until the 9+ threshold is reached. Accepts briefs in any format — text, voice transcript, PDF, or raw notes. Use when the user asks to generate creative concepts, brainstorm campaign ideas, develop a Big Idea or campaign platform, evaluate or critique existing creative work, find consumer insights, or shares a brief for ideation — including activations, PR-stunts, brand utility, experiential, and non-advertising ideas. Calibrates against a library of 569 legendary campaigns (P01-P18 pattern map) to detect saturation and ensure originality. Do not use for media planning, production budgeting, brand identity/logo design, copywriting final drafts, or market research data collection.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Design a Montessori three-period lesson for introducing concepts through concrete materials and naming. Use when teaching vocabulary, classifications, or concepts through hands-on materials.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when you need a bite-sized, TDD-driven implementation plan but do NOT have a brainstorm-beagle spec to plan against. quick-plan reconstructs intent from the current conversation, fans out domain-expert exploration subagents across the codebase, and synthesizes the same plan format write-plan produces — without requiring `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/spec.md`. Triggers on: "quick plan", "plan this out", "plan what we just discussed", "turn this into an implementation plan", "plan this without a spec", "I don't have a spec, just plan it", "write-plan but no spec". Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants an implementation or TDD plan and there is no spec to plan against — even if they just say "plan it" after discussing a feature. Writes to `.beagle/plans/<slug>/plan.md`. If a finalized spec already exists at `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/spec.md`, prefer write-plan. Does NOT brainstorm specs, write code, or execute the plan — produces the plan document (and an optional handoff prompt) only.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when you have a finalized brainstorm-beagle spec at `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/spec.md` and need a bite-sized, TDD-driven implementation plan before any code is written. Triggers on: "write a plan", "plan this spec", "turn the spec into a plan", "now plan the implementation", "write-plan". Reads the spec, designs the file structure, decomposes work into 2-5 minute TDD steps with exact paths and commands, self-reviews against the spec, gets user approval, then writes to `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/plan.md` and offers to generate an execution handoff prompt via the subagent-prompt skill. Does NOT brainstorm specs, write code, or execute the plan — produces the plan document (and an optional handoff prompt) only.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Create polished, code-driven Remotion motion explainers from scripts, narration, subtitles, product specifications, reference videos, UI recordings, diagrams, or abstract concepts. Use for product launches, AI demonstrations, UI interactions, algorithms, scientific principles, electrical systems, data flows, architecture, charts, equations, and concepts best expressed with React, SVG, Canvas, WebGL, or Three.js. Prioritize continuous spatial logic, visible cause and effect, precise interaction states, editable parameters, deterministic rendering, and evidence-backed visual QA.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Builds and audits a concept-ontology for a regelrecht corpus to decide and verify reference types — cross-law source-binding vs intra-law source-binding vs open-norm leaf vs external-fact leaf — and to catch concept conflation across laws. Core principle: a value's reference type is fixed by WHO derives it, and a binding is sound only when producer and consumer denote the SAME concept; the lexical surface (the word in the text) is not the concept. Detects false friends (one term, different concepts — e.g. a register-based vs a factual "naar de omstandigheden"-based residence/ingezetene concept), orphan plain-params (a value a regulation actually derives, modeled as a brute input), negation/complement re-entry (¬X modeled as an independent leaf next to X), and duplication (one concept re-entered as several independent leafs, losing the single-source-of-truth invariant). Produces a law-level glossary and a stelsel-level concept map with sound same-concept binding edges and flagged lexical-match-but-concept-mismatch edges. Use when deciding whether a value should be cross-law/intra-law/leaf, when the same term means different things across laws, or when a binding might silently conflate concepts.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when creating scientific magazine cover style images or prompts, research hero visuals, journal-cover-inspired concepts, academic poster covers, PPT covers, and high-impact scientific visual concepts. If the user asks to generate the image, use ChatGPT image generation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Continuously detect recurring UI/UX concepts during frontend discussions, track conversation-wide recurrence, and register repeated concepts as structured knowledge assets in a Notion database via MCP. Activates when UI/UX principles, heuristics, laws, or design patterns recur during frontend work, or on manual @ux commands (@ux save, @ux skip, @ux link).
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Generate three radically distinct, on-trend brand concepts for any app or product and present them as a single no-scroll hero webpage — a bento "brand book" (logo + tagline, in-app screen, out-of-home, merch, palette, type, voice) that assembles itself with a staggered pop on every toggle. Grounded in 2024-2026 design trends, not safe defaults. Triggers: "brand kit", "brand book", "brand concepts", "show me a few directions", "make it look like an agency did it", "build a brand for my app".
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Comprehensive JavaScript reference covering 33+ essential concepts every developer should know. From fundamentals like primitives and closures to advanced patterns like async/await and functional programming. Use when explaining JS concepts, debugging JavaScript issues, or teaching JavaScript fundamentals.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Facilitate ideation, explore alternatives, and refine concepts through structured brainstorming techniques before implementation. Use when starting new projects, designing features, exploring solutions, evaluating tradeoffs, challenging assumptions, generating creative ideas, planning architecture, or refining rough concepts into detailed designs.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when explaining concepts at different expertise levels, moving between abstract principles and concrete implementation, identifying edge cases by testing ideas against scenarios, designing layered documentation, decomposing complex problems into actionable steps, or bridging strategy-execution gaps. Invoke when user mentions abstraction levels, making concepts concrete, or explaining at different depths.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Generate logo directions — "give me logo concepts for", "logo ideas for", "design a logo for". Emits 3 to 5 distinct directions as real editable SVG vector code, not raster mockups.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Comprehensive JavaScript reference covering 33+ essential concepts every developer should know. From fundamentals like primitives and closures to advanced patterns like async/await and functional programming. Use when explaining JS concepts, debugging JavaScript issues, or teaching JavaScript fundamentals.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
将收集好的素材逐步写成文章，提供多个展开方向供用户选择。先确认读者已有的知识，再按理解顺序解释概念，每次只写入选中的内容，并保留用户修改。
通过具体案例和代码对照，厘清项目中的业务术语、概念边界及其关系，将商定的定义写入术语表，并在需要时记录重要设计决策的理由。
将抽象概念或机制转化为带有可动旋钮、指针等细节的机器，以斜上方视角制作可操作的说明图，输出为HTML、SVG或React组件。
使用稀疏自编码器将语言模型内部的激活分解为少量特征，研究模型学到的概念。涵盖预训练SAE分析、自定义训练、重建质量评估，以及利用特征调整输出的实验。
为Slack表情和消息制作动态图像，可使用上传的图片或绘制的图形，调整尺寸、颜色数量和运动速度，并用附带工具检查GIF是否符合要求。
通过对话深入梳理模糊的想法，比较多个方案，形成可付诸行动的构想，并明确目标人群、成功标准、待验证假设、最小范围和不做的事项。
制作介绍品牌标志、配色、字体及使用规则的HTML幻灯片，保留奶油色背景和多彩点缀，将品牌内容整理为供客户或团队讨论的演示资料。
为广告策划和设计确定方向，从梳理需求推进到评估与展示。结合多种创意方法、反复自评和可用制作资源，组织创作流程并规划改进。