464 个 · 按相关度排序
Structure board presentations and investor updates using financial, sales, product, and people perspectives. Turn supplied metrics into a coherent account of progress, explain missed targets, and make decisions and requests explicit, with placeholders for missing figures.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Have Claude and GPT critique each other's answers, revise their positions, and work toward a combined response. Choose the number of rounds and see what changed, where they agree, and which disagreements remain.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Check implemented features through conversational acceptance testing, confirming behavior from the user's perspective. Record each result, retain testing progress, and diagnose reported problems to prepare verified repair plans for a subsequent execution step.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Review feature plans before development from business strategy, user experience, and engineering perspectives. Receive scored assessments, specific gaps tied to requirements, and prioritized actions that clarify what must change before the team starts building.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Add a real 3D object to a web page using Three.js. Combine geometric depth, materials that respond to light, perspective, and subtle rotation or floating motion for hero sections and product visuals.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Create a WebGL background with a perspective grid, fading lines, and sparse floating particles. Add slow forward motion and gentle mouse-responsive camera movement, then tune density, color, and depth to support foreground content.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Work through repeated failed fixes or difficult technical choices using five perspectives: practical action, missing information, simplification, architecture, and challenged assumptions. Compare alternatives and disagreements, then receive a recommendation while keeping the final decision with the user.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Coordinate multiple AI agents in Diverga for parallel research, reviews, and methodology comparisons. Manage team creation, progress, and results, or run VS Arena debates where different research perspectives critique recommendations before the user chooses an approach.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Plan philosophy and interdisciplinary papers by comparing preprint platforms, searching literature, identifying unanswered questions, and assessing originality. Receive a detailed outline with section word counts, key citations, and improvements based on a reviewer-style assessment.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Research technical or business questions through multiple available AI providers, each assigned a different perspective. Combine usable results into a report covering findings, disagreements, evidence gaps, priorities, and recommended next steps.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Review an APM pull request through specialist agent perspectives selected for the changed areas. Findings are combined into one advisory comment with follow-up priorities and a shipping recommendation, leaving the final decision to maintainers and authors.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Set up Agentica patterns that coordinate multiple AI agents. Choose different perspectives for research, a coordinator with specialists for implementation, repeated generation and critique for refinement, or a panel of agents for majority-based validation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Stand up a three.js scene: import maps and the three/addons path, the Scene/PerspectiveCamera/WebGLRenderer trio, the setAnimationLoop render loop, responsive resize, and OrbitControls. Use when starting or debugging a three.js app — when the user mentions three.js, THREE.Scene, WebGLRenderer, PerspectiveCamera, the render loop, resizing, or OrbitControls. For models use threejs-gltf-loading; for materials/lights use threejs-materials-lighting.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when targeting Environmental Health Perspectives or deciding whether an environmental-health manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the public-health-relevance and methodological-rigor bar, epidemiological/toxicological expectations, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Work with hyperspectral and multispectral images in MATLAB. Covers reading/writing (ENVI, NITF, TIFF, Sentinel-2, Landsat, ASTER), ECOSTRESS spectral libraries, processing (calibration, atmospheric correction, denoising, sharpening, dimensionality reduction, endmember extraction, unmixing, target/anomaly detection, spectral indices, segmentation), labeling (Spectral Image Labeler app, ground truth objects, automation algorithms), and deep learning (pixel classification CNNs, unmixing autoencoders, transfer learning). Use when reading, writing, processing, analyzing, classifying, labeling, or applying deep learning to hyperspectral or multispectral images.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
史蒂夫·乔布斯(Steve Jobs)的思维框架与表达方式。基于Isaacson授权传记、Stanford演讲、 Lost Interview、D Conference系列、Make Something Wonderful、30+一手来源的深度调研， 提炼6个核心心智模型、8条决策启发式和完整的表达DNA。 用途：作为思维顾问，用乔布斯的视角分析产品、审视决策、提供反馈。 当用户提到「用乔布斯的视角」「乔布斯会怎么看」「Jobs模式」「steve jobs perspective」时使用。 即使用户只是说「帮我用乔布斯的角度想想」「如果乔布斯会怎么做」「切换到乔布斯」也应触发。
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
When the user wants multiple expert perspectives on a marketing question — a simulated board of advisors staffed by legendary marketers (Seth Godin, David Ogilvy, Eugene Schwartz, April Dunford, Rory Sutherland, Alex Hormozi, Byron Sharp, and more). Also use when the user mentions 'marketing council,' 'board of advisors,' 'advisory board,' 'what would Seth Godin say,' 'what would Ogilvy think,' 'channel Hormozi,' 'get multiple perspectives,' 'debate this,' 'have the council review,' 'marketing mentors,' or asks how a famous marketer would approach their problem. The council gives each advisor's take through their documented frameworks, surfaces where they disagree, and synthesizes a recommendation. For executing the winning direction, hand off to positioning, offers, copywriting, ads, or the relevant skill.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Multi-LLM collaborative brainstorming and planning. Use when user explicitly requests consultation with multiple AI models (ChatGPT, Gemini, other LLMs) before presenting an implementation plan, or asks to "consult the council", "ask other models", or "get perspectives from other AIs". Queries external LLM APIs, synthesizes their perspectives, and presents an adapted implementation plan.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when user asks to compare masters, compare schools, compare perspectives, 对比, 各宗怎么看, 不同宗派, 禅净之争, 性相之辩, 空有之争, or wants multiple masters to answer the same question. Triggers include "对比"、"比较"、"各宗"、"不同宗派怎么看"、"禅宗和净土"、"天台和华严"、"唯识和中观"、"空有之争"、"性相之辩"、"各位祖师"、"多个角度"、"compare"、"comparison" — invoke whenever user's question implicitly or explicitly seeks multi-tradition perspectives on a Buddhist topic.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查理·芒格的思维框架与表达方式。基于《穷查理宝典》、伯克希尔/Daily Journal股东会、 USC/哈佛演讲、访谈记录、外部批评等50+来源的深度调研， 提炼5个核心心智模型、8条决策启发式和完整的表达DNA。 用途：作为思维顾问，用芒格的视角分析问题、审视决策、提供反馈。 当用户提到「用芒格的视角」「芒格会怎么看」「芒格模式」「munger perspective」时使用。 也适用于：投资决策审视、认知偏误检查、跨学科思考训练、逆向思考练习。 即使用户只是说「逆向思考一下」「这有什么认知偏误」「Lollapalooza效应」「能力圈之外」「激励结构是什么」也可触发。 不要在用户只是问「这个决策靠谱吗」「帮我找盲点」等一般性问题时触发——只在涉及逆向思考、认知偏误、跨学科分析等芒格核心方法论时激活。
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
孙宇晨(Justin Sun)的思维框架与表达方式。基于21,829条推文（14,418 EN + 7,411 ZH）、 1本自传《这世界既残酷也温柔》、155集音频课《财富自由革命之路》(~18小时)、 40+篇深度采访与调查报道、2篇核心中文长访谈（花总86分钟+晚点76分钟）、 2期英文深度播客（Bankless 90分钟+UpOnly 60分钟）、1段太空飞行纪录， 提炼14个核心心智模型、18条决策启发式和完整的表达DNA。 用途：作为思维顾问，用孙宇晨的视角分析加密行业、审视商业决策、提供反馈。 当用户提到「用孙宇晨的视角」「Justin Sun会怎么看」「孙哥模式」「sun perspective」时使用。 即使用户只是说「帮我用孙宇晨的角度想想」「如果Justin Sun会怎么做」「切换到孙哥」也应触发。
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
理查德·费曼的思维框架与表达方式。基于40+个一手来源的深度调研， 提炼5个核心心智模型、8条决策启发式和完整的表达DNA。 用途：作为思维顾问，用费曼的视角分析问题、审视决策、提供反馈。 当用户提到「用费曼的视角」「费曼会怎么看」「费曼模式」「feynman perspective」「费曼学习法」时使用。 即使用户只是说「这是不是cargo cult」「命名不等于理解」「能不能做个演示替代论证」「我真的理解了还是只记住了名字」也可触发。 不要在用户只是说「帮我解释一下」「用简单的话说」等一般性请求时触发——只在涉及费曼式验证（货物崇拜检测、命名vs理解、反自欺）时激活。
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
唐纳德·特朗普（Donald Trump）的思维框架与行为逻辑。基于著作、长访谈、辩论、 心理分析、前幕僚回忆录、重大决策记录共6个维度的深度调研（320KB+原始资料）， 提炼6个核心心智模型、8条决策启发式和完整的表达DNA。 用途：（1）思维顾问——用特朗普视角分析谈判、权力、传播问题； （2）行为预判——解读他的公开行为背后的逻辑，预判下一步动作； （3）角色扮演——模拟特朗普在特定场景下的决策和表达。 当用户提到「用懂王视角」「特朗普会怎么看」「懂王逻辑」「trump perspective」 「懂王会怎么做」「从特朗普角度分析」「预测特朗普」时触发。
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Naval Ravikant的思维操作系统。基于著作、播客、推文、决策记录和外部批评的深度调研， 提炼5个核心心智模型、8条决策启发式和完整的表达DNA。 激活后沉浸式扮演Naval，直接以「我」的视角回应问题。 当用户提到「用Naval的视角」「Naval会怎么看」「纳瓦尔模式」「Naval perspective」「切换到Naval」时使用。 即使用户只是说「这份工作有杠杆吗」「什么是specific knowledge」「什么是真正的财富」「欲望太多怎么办」「无需许可的路径」也可触发。 不要在用户只是问「我该怎么选择」「帮我想清楚」等一般性决策问题时触发——只在涉及杠杆/特定知识/欲望管理/财富定义等Naval核心概念时激活。
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。