“model quality”的搜索结果

Move quality earlier in the development lifecycle. Covers dev/QA pairing patterns, Three Amigos sessions, TDD facilitation (Red-Green-Refactor), PR review checklists for testability, and Definition of Done with quality gates. Includes shift-left maturity model for team assessment. Use when: "shift left," "TDD," "dev-QA pairing," "definition of done," "testability," "quality culture," "QA in sprint planning." Not for: writing the unit tests themselves — use unit-testing; automated PR test-quality review at scale — use ai-qa-review; multi-quarter QA direction or roadmap — use test-strategy. Related: unit-testing, ai-qa-review, test-strategy.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when a model is served online (FastAPI, BentoML) or scored in batch, when changing how a model artifact is loaded or versioned, or when adding drift, quality or prediction monitoring and a rollout plan for a new model

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Expert guide for intelligent model cascading and routing — complexity-scored task routing from Flash/Haiku to Sonnet/Opus/Astra, dynamic escalation with quality gates, 40-60% token cost reduction while maintaining output quality / Panduan ahli untuk kaskade dan routing model cerdas — routing tugas berbasis skor kompleksitas dari Flash/Haiku ke Sonnet/Opus/Astra, eskalasi dinamis dengan gerbang kualitas, pengurangan biaya token 40-60% dengan kualitas output terjaga.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Run a Meta-Harness-style optimization loop NATIVELY — automatically search over the scaffolding around a FIXED base model (memory, retrieval, context construction, prompt templates, summarization, tool-selection logic) by proposing candidate variants, scoring each on a cheap deterministic eval, and keeping a Pareto frontier of quality vs cost — using native Agent / Workflow / loop tools instead of a standalone Python harness. Use this whenever the user wants to optimize, evolve, tune, distill, or search over a harness, scaffold, prompt system, memory or retrieval policy, context-assembly code, or summarizer while keeping the model fixed; whenever they mention Meta-Harness, harness optimization, scaffold evolution, automatic prompt/memory optimization, an evolutionary or Pareto search over candidate implementations, or "make the harness/agent better without retraining"; and whenever the gain must come from the code AROUND the model rather than the model weights. Reproduces the Meta-Harness paper's method natively, with no claude_wrapper.py and no metered solver API.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Constructs multi-factor models with value, momentum, quality, size, and volatility factor definitions and portfolio construction rules. Use when building factor models, designing systematic strategies, or constructing factor portfolios.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Run the four paper-quality autoraters from PaperOrchestra (arXiv:2604.05018, App. F.3) — Citation F1 (P0/P1 partition + Precision/Recall/F1), Literature Review Quality (6-axis 0-100 with anti-inflation rules), SxS Overall Paper Quality (side-by-side), and SxS Literature Review Quality (side-by-side). TRIGGER when the user asks to "score this paper draft", "evaluate against the benchmark", "compare two papers", or "run the autoraters".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when solving CUMCM, MCM, ICM, or other mathematical modeling tasks that need contest problem intake, model selection, Python solving, figures, paper writing, quality audit, and packaged deliverables.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Review a data analysis for quality, correctness, and reproducibility. Covers data quality assessment, assumption checking, model validation, data leakage detection, and reproducibility verification. Use when reviewing a colleague's analysis before publication, validating an ML pipeline before production deployment, auditing a report for regulatory or business decision-making, or performing a second-analyst review in a regulated environment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Analyze pre-trained generative diffusion models (Stable Diffusion, DALL-E, Flux) by computing quality metrics (FID, IS, CLIP score, precision/recall), inspecting noise schedules, extracting and visualizing attention maps, and probing latent spaces. Use when evaluating a pre-trained generative diffusion model's output quality, comparing noise schedule variants, analyzing cross-attention patterns for text-conditioned generation, interpolating between latent codes, or detecting out-of-distribution inputs.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Analyze catastrophe modeling systems for natural disaster exposure, PML estimation, and reinsurance optimization. Use when: 'assess cat model', 'evaluate disaster exposure', 'review PML calculations', 'audit reinsurance program', 'check exposure data quality', 'analyze hurricane/earthquake risk models', 'evaluate Oasis or RMS setup'.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Run a Meta-Harness-style optimization loop NATIVELY — automatically search over the scaffolding around a FIXED base model (memory, retrieval, context construction, prompt templates, summarization, tool-selection logic) by proposing candidate variants, scoring each on a cheap deterministic eval, and keeping a Pareto frontier of quality vs cost — using native Agent / Workflow / loop tools instead of a standalone Python harness. Use this whenever the user wants to optimize, evolve, tune, distill, or search over a harness, scaffold, prompt system, memory or retrieval policy, context-assembly code, or summarizer while keeping the model fixed; whenever they mention Meta-Harness, harness optimization, scaffold evolution, automatic prompt/memory optimization, an evolutionary or Pareto search over candidate implementations, or "make the harness/agent better without retraining"; and whenever the gain must come from the code AROUND the model rather than the model weights. Reproduces the Meta-Harness paper's method natively, with no claude_wrapper.py and no metered solver API.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Routes LLM requests to a local model first (Ollama, LM Studio, llamafile), validates the response quality, and escalates to cloud only when the local result fails. Tracks local vs escalated vs cloud outcomes in a persistent dashboard. Use when: (1) user asks to run a task with a local model first, (2) user wants to reduce cloud API costs or keep requests private, (3) user wants post-outcome quality validation before committing to a local result, (4) user asks to see token savings or the routing dashboard, (5) any request where local-vs-cloud routing should be decided automatically with a quality gate. Supports Ollama, LM Studio, and llamafile as local providers.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Great Expectations, dbt tests, anomaly detection, and data contracts for data quality. Activate on: data quality, data validation, Great Expectations, data contract, anomaly detection, SLA, freshness check, schema validation. NOT for: dbt model structure (use dbt-analytics-engineer), schema evolution (use schema-evolution-manager).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Evaluates LLMs across 60+ academic benchmarks (MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, HellaSwag). Use when benchmarking model quality, comparing models, reporting academic results, or tracking training progress. Industry standard used by EleutherAI, HuggingFace, and major labs. Supports HuggingFace, vLLM, APIs.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Evaluate LLM outputs using frontier models as judges. Use for pairwise model comparison, quality scoring with custom rubrics, and automated evaluation pipelines. Covers position bias mitigation, statistical significance, and generating preference data for DPO/RLHF.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Great Expectations, dbt tests, anomaly detection, and data contracts for data quality. Activate on: data quality, data validation, Great Expectations, data contract, anomaly detection, SLA, freshness check, schema validation. NOT for: dbt model structure (use dbt-analytics-engineer), schema evolution (use schema-evolution-manager).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Produces a narrow-interval quality signal for a WinDAGs skill that a third party can verify without inspecting model weights or method internals. The mechanism is attribution-kNN over a tamper-evident outcome log (task→skills→accept/reject store), combined with a conformal-prediction calibration certificate that provides a formal coverage guarantee. Thompson/Beta sampling is explicitly rejected as a category error: it produces a selection signal for stationary i.i.d. rewards, not an attestation signal for context-dependent LLM output quality. The resulting bundle — outcome-log Merkle root + conformal threshold + optional TEE guardrail signature — constitutes a "narrow-interval trust" credential: verifiable, bounded, and internals-opaque.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

[BETA] Detect, review, and fix code-quality and correctness issues in an AEM as a Cloud Service project — locally, with no external services or network calls. Use whenever a user wants to check, review, assess, audit, scan, modernize, upgrade, or fix AEM Java, Sling Models, OSGi, or Maven code — for example: "check my Sling Models are implemented correctly", "review my @Inject usage", "are my Maven dependencies up to date", "scan this AEM project for issues", "modernize my Sling Models", or "fix code-quality problems". Name the files to assess, or ask it to scan the repo; it detects issues, plans, and — only when you ask — applies surgical edits on a branch or in place, then verifies with mvn compile. It recognises the intent and handles each issue type itself, reporting anything it cannot yet fix. This skill is in beta. Verify all outputs before applying them to production projects.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Evaluate BMad skills using your agent's configured runner. Compare results with the model alone or another version, grade outputs against criteria, and test whether descriptions trigger correctly, preserving transcripts and evidence for each run.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Compare a skill with the model alone
• Compare an edited skill with a previous version
• Grade outputs against defined criteria

Analyze Neuropixels neural recordings with SpikeInterface, from loading and preprocessing to motion correction and spike sorting, which separates signals by neuron. Calculate quality metrics, review candidate units, and export plots and data for further inspection.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Inspect and preprocess SpikeGLX, Open Ephys, or NWB recordings
• Check and correct movement-related drift before spike sorting
• Evaluate and select units using quality metrics

Improve workflows involving multiple AI agents by measuring bottlenecks, adjusting workload distribution, and managing model costs. This design guide helps compare changes against a measured baseline while checking quality, latency, and resource use.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Finding bottlenecks in workflows involving multiple agents
• Reviewing task distribution and parallel execution
• Reducing model costs within quality thresholds

Develop incident response procedures for LLM outages, declining answer quality, spending spikes, and unsafe outputs. Use example monitoring alerts, severity levels, recovery playbooks, and postmortem guidance to organize detection, response, and follow-up work.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Plan fallback procedures for model provider outages
• Investigate declining answer quality after a deployment
• Prepare emergency controls for token spending spikes

Design scheduled AI workflows for document ingestion, batch processing, and model training using Prefect, Airflow, or Dagster. Compare orchestration tools and plan task dependencies, retries, caching, and monitoring through implementation fragments.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Schedule document ingestion and RAG index refreshes
• Design batch workflows for LLM requests
• Connect model training with quality evaluation

Prepare an initial equity research report through five separate tasks covering company research, financial forecasts, valuation, charts, and report assembly. Outputs include research notes, an Excel financial model, chart files, and a detailed Word report.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Researching a company’s business, competitors, and risks
• Building financial forecasts with three scenarios
• Estimating a price target using multiple valuation methods