Knowledge base from the DoD Test & Evaluation Enterprise Guidebook (August 2022 edition 8.02) with DOT&E-facing enterprise emphasis. Use for T&E enterprise roles (DOT&E vs USD(R&E)), DT&E/OT&E/LFT&E, cybersecurity T&E, MOSA/automation/digital enablers, suitability/reliability growth, and TEMP/Strategy/STE planning. Distinct routing from dod-te-guidebook (same guidebook family, pathway-deep pack). Guidance only—defer to DoDI 5000.89 and Title 10 for binding requirements.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs☆ 82026年10月15日 更新
Knowledge base from the FAA System Safety Handbook (Dec 30, 2000). Use for system safety as a specialty within systems engineering: the five-step safety risk management process (mandated by FAA Order 8040.4 and the AMS), the severity-by-likelihood risk matrix and acceptance bands, the Safety Order of Precedence, system-description models (5M, SHEL(L)), the hazard-analysis activities (PHL/PHA/RHA/SSHA/SHA/O&SHA/HHA), integrated system hazard analysis, the analysis techniques (FTA, FMEA/FMECA, Fault Hazard, Common Cause, Sneak Circuit, Energy Trace), closed-loop hazard tracking (Safety Action Record), and the specialty domains the handbook covers — acquisition-lifecycle safety and contracting (OSA/CSA/SSPP/ISSPP), software safety (control-capability ranking, SHCM, DO-178B), test & evaluation safety, facilities safety, commercial launch safety (AST licensing, expected casualty, MPL/DAMP), system safety training, and Operational Risk Management (ORM) with human/organizational factors. Scope limits: this is a year-2000 FAA how-to; it predates the modern FAA/ICAO Safety Management System (SMS) and Just Culture regulatory frameworks, and many cited orders, advisory circulars, and launch-licensing rules have since been restructured. It is FAA/NAS-centric, leans on MIL-STD-882C, and does not define the SE life-cycle processes themselves (use nasa-npr-7123 / dau-se-guidebook) or reproduce third-party standard text (MIL-STD-882, DO-178B, ISO/IEC/IEEE).
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs☆ 82026年10月15日 更新
Knowledge pack from 'Towards Digital Engineering: The Advent of Digital Systems Engineering' (Huang et al., Old Dominion University, arXiv:2002.11672, 2020). Use when reasoning about digital engineering, the DoD Digital Engineering Strategy and its five goals, the Authoritative Source of Truth, digitalization vs. digitization, digital augmentation, digitalized models, provenance, unique identification, and the four-level (vision/strategy/action/foundation) DSE research framework. Covers the conceptual/vision layer of the field. SCOPE LIMITS: this is a single ~28-page vision paper, not a methods handbook — it is thin on step-by-step procedures, tooling, case studies, and quantitative evaluation, and it predates 2020 so it does not cover later digital-engineering standards or recent AI/LLM advances. Use the sebok pack for established SE canon and MBSE depth.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs☆ 82026年10月15日 更新
Structured problem solving in 6 steps: Problem definition, goals, brainstorming, evaluation, implementation, and review.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
ellmos-ai/skills☆ 82026年10月19日 更新
Structured decision making: Pro/Con matrix, weighted scoring, decision tree, scenario analysis, and Eisenhower matrix.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
ellmos-ai/skills☆ 82026年10月19日 更新
当用户在评估"这个诱因好不好""这个场景绑定有没有效""咖啡和热巧克力哪个是更好的诱因"时激活此skill。 典型触发信号:用户提到"评估诱因""这个场景绑定行不行""选什么作为品牌诱因""诱因效果好不好""哪个刺激物更适合做激活线索"等。 不适用于:还在找诱因的阶段(那是trigger-habitat的工作)、评估内容的趣味性(那是social-currency的工作)、评估情绪感染力(那是情绪skill的工作)。 有效诱因评估矩阵:频率(诱因多久出现一次)、强度(诱因是否专一指向产品)、情境(诱因激活时用户能否采取行动)三维量化评估。频率比强度更重要。
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
kangarooking/contagious-skill☆ 82026年5月3日 更新
Google Sheets skill for reading and writing spreadsheets via the gws CLI. Covers cell reads, row appends, batch updates, sheet management, and formula evaluation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
nvdigitalsolutions/mcp-ai-wpoos☆ 72026年10月21日 更新
Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
ranbot-ai/awesome-skills☆ 72026年10月20日 更新
Overview of six AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and p
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
ranbot-ai/awesome-skills☆ 72026年10月20日 更新
Use when comparing prompt changes against a fixed evaluation set: record actual model settings, required checks, missing results, judge limitations and case-level regression evidence.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
ranbot-ai/awesome-skills☆ 72026年10月20日 更新
Evaluate agent behavior with versioned cases and explicit verifiers. Use when comparing agent or prompt changes, reproducing failures, or running agent regression tests.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
ranbot-ai/awesome-skills☆ 72026年10月20日 更新
Design LLM-as-judge rubrics, direct scores and pairwise comparisons. Use for judge models, evals, position bias and calibration against human labels.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
ranbot-ai/awesome-skills☆ 72026年10月20日 更新
Build automated evaluation suites for AI agents using golden datasets, rubrics, and regression gates. Use when shipping agent features, validating prompt changes, or gating deployments on quality.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
ranbot-ai/awesome-skills☆ 72026年10月20日 更新
Sales enablement, technical presales and deal acceleration for B2B SaaS revenue teams. Use this skill when planning outbound campaigns, running discovery calls, building deal strategy, creating battle cards, writing proposals, responding to RFPs, preparing a product demo, scoping a proof of concept or pilot, answering a security questionnaire, executing sales sequences, or coaching qualification. Also triggers on: outbound, cold outreach, deal strategy, pipeline, battle card, proposal, RFP, discovery call, MEDDPICC, sales sequence, qualification, sales engineer, solutions engineer, presales, demo plan, demo script, POC, proof of concept, pilot success criteria, technical evaluation, technical win, security questionnaire, vendor security review, SOC 2 questionnaire, technical objection, mutual action plan, MAP, close plan, mutual close plan, buyer enablement, the deal is stalled, deal stalled after the demo, how do I get this deal to close, close date keeps slipping, JOLT, buyer indecision, no-decision loss.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
unempyd/revenueos☆ 72026年9月14日 更新
Optimize for AI search, answer engines, GEO/AEO/LLMO and conventional search together. Use for citability, AI crawler access, entity/brand evidence, llms.txt evaluation, platform readiness and AI-answer visibility.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
unempyd/revenueos☆ 72026年9月14日 更新
Public relations, corporate communications, and analyst relations for B2B SaaS. Use this skill for earned media and press strategy, announcements and press releases, executive and crisis communications, media relationships and briefings, and the Gartner/Forrester/IDC analyst program including Magic Quadrant and Wave evaluation submissions. Also triggers on: PR, public relations, press release, earned media, media relations, journalist, embargo, announcement, crisis comms, corporate communications, analyst relations, AR, Gartner, Forrester, IDC, Magic Quadrant, Forrester Wave, analyst briefing, inquiry.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
unempyd/revenueos☆ 72026年9月14日 更新
Fix MSBuild targets that generate files during the build but those files are missing from compilation or output. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: generated source files not compiling (CS0246 for a type that should exist), custom build tasks that create files but they are invisible to subsequent targets, globs not capturing build-generated files because they expand at evaluation time before execution creates them, ensuring generated files are cleaned by the Clean target. Covers correct BeforeTargets timing (CoreCompile, BeforeBuild, AssignTargetPaths), adding to Compile/FileWrites item groups, using $(IntermediateOutputPath) instead of hardcoded obj/ paths. DO NOT USE FOR: C# source generators that already work via the Roslyn pipeline, T4 design-time generation that runs in Visual Studio, non-MSBuild build systems. INVOKES: no tools — pure knowledge skill.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
bouclem/skills☆ 72026年5月31日 更新
Guide for organizing MSBuild infrastructure with Directory.Build.props, Directory.Build.targets, Directory.Packages.props, and Directory.Build.rsp. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: structuring multi-project repos, centralizing build settings, implementing NuGet Central Package Management (CPM) with ManagePackageVersionsCentrally, consolidating duplicated properties across .csproj files, setting up multi-level Directory.Build hierarchy with GetPathOfFileAbove, understanding evaluation order (Directory.Build.props → SDK .props → .csproj → SDK .targets → Directory.Build.targets). Critical pitfall: $(TargetFramework) conditions in .props silently fail for single-targeting projects — must use .targets. DO NOT USE FOR: non-MSBuild build systems, migrating legacy projects to SDK-style (use msbuild-modernization), single-project solutions with no shared settings. INVOKES: no tools — pure knowledge skill.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
bouclem/skills☆ 72026年5月31日 更新
Guide for optimizing MSBuild incremental builds. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: builds slower than expected on subsequent runs, 'nothing changed but it rebuilds anyway', diagnosing why targets re-execute unnecessarily, fixing broken no-op builds. Covers 8 common causes: missing Inputs/Outputs on custom targets, volatile properties in output paths (timestamps/GUIDs), file writes outside tracked Outputs, missing FileWrites registration, glob changes, Visual Studio Fast Up-to-Date Check (FUTDC) issues. Key diagnostic: look for 'Building target completely' vs 'Skipping target' in binlog. DO NOT USE FOR: first-time build slowness (use build-perf-baseline), parallelism issues (use build-parallelism), evaluation-phase slowness (use eval-performance), non-MSBuild build systems. INVOKES: binlog MCP server tools (overview, search, target details); falls back to dotnet build /bl, binlog replay with diagnostic verbosity.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
bouclem/skills☆ 72026年5月31日 更新
Azure AI Projects SDK for Java. High-level SDK for Azure AI Foundry project management including connections, datasets, indexes, and evaluations.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
bouclem/skills☆ 72026年5月31日 更新
Azure AI Projects SDK for .NET. High-level client for Azure AI Foundry projects including agents, connections, datasets, deployments, evaluations, and indexes.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
bouclem/skills☆ 72026年5月31日 更新
High-level SDK for Azure AI Foundry projects with agents, connections, deployments, and evaluations.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
bouclem/skills☆ 72026年5月31日 更新
Best practices for scikit-learn machine learning, model development, evaluation, and deployment in Python
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
bouclem/skills☆ 72026年5月31日 更新
Machine learning in Python with scikit-learn. Use for classification, regression, clustering, model evaluation, and ML pipelines.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
bouclem/skills☆ 72026年5月31日 更新