614 个 · 按相关度排序
Use for lateral thinking, or when ideas feel stuck or incremental: "we've tried everything", "need a surprising angle", "break the pattern", "give me a wild idea that could work". Uses provocations and reframes. Skip for rule lookups or strict logical proofs.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use for strategic thinking, or when the user must choose a direction under constraints: "where should we focus?", "how do we win?", "roadmap for next year", "what should we not do?". Ends in explicit bets and risks. Skip for step-by-step implementation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use for design thinking, or when a product or service problem needs user understanding before solutions: "what do users really need?", "how might we...", "plan a discovery sprint", "validate this concept". Skip when the spec is frozen or the task is code maintenance.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when the user describes a problem, decision or stuck situation but names no method: "how should I approach this?", "help me think this through", "we can't decide", "where do I start?". Picks the best-fit thinking method and runs it. Skip for plain execution tasks or when a method is named.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use for critical thinking, or when the user wants a claim, plan or decision checked for weak spots: "is this right?", "what am I missing?", "poke holes", "sanity check", "devil's advocate", "red team this". Skip for execution-only tasks and wording edits.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use for creative thinking, or when the user wants many fresh options before choosing: "give me ideas", "brainstorm names", "other ways to do this", "think outside the box". Diverges first, then picks. Skip when one answer is wanted or the task is pure execution.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use for systems thinking, or when a change may ripple beyond its target: "what are the side effects?", "why does this keep coming back?", "how do these teams or services affect each other?". Maps loops, delays and leverage points. Skip for single-step fixes.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use for first principles thinking, or when the user questions an inherited default: "why do we do it this way?", "is this cost really necessary?", "should we copy what competitors do?". Strips analogies and rebuilds from fundamentals. Skip for convention-following checklists.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use for analytical thinking, or when a question needs breaking down and evidence: "why did metric X drop?", "what drives this?", "break this down", "what data do we need?". Builds a tree, hypotheses and evidence, ends with an answer and key uncertainty. Skip for quick verdicts.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when stuck on approach, not debugging. Unstick via 7 techniques: simplification, collision-zone thinking, inversion, first principles, via negativa. For debugging use mk:sequential-thinking.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Problem solving and analysis: Structured thinking processes for complex problems. Divide & Conquer, Root Cause Analysis, SWOT, Pareto, and decision heuristics.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Meta-skill: Structured thinking as a 3-phase workflow. Combines analysis (think), ideation (brainstorm), and decision-making (decide) into one continuous process.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
TEKION Slide Generator v4 — プレゼンスライド生成（OpenAI GPT-image-2 デフォルト / Gemini 3.1 Flash 両対応）。「スライドを作って」「プレゼン資料」で発動。Markdown/テキスト→デザインガイドライン→並列画像生成→PPTX/PDF。日本語テキスト精度重視の営業資料・提案書はOpenAI、大量生成や実在ブランド/人物はGemini。Visual/Balanced 2スタイル、ロゴ/参考画像、グラウンディング、Thinking制御対応。
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Product Inventor e Design Alchemist de nivel maximo — combina Product Thinking, Design Systems, UI Engineering, Psicologia Cognitiva, Storytelling e execucao impecavel nivel Jobs/Apple.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Force unrelated concepts together to discover emergent properties - "What if we treated X like Y?
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Claude API (platform.claude.com) の Messages API リファレンス。 streaming (SSE), thinking (adaptive) / preserved thinking / effort, prompt caching, context editing, compaction (on-demand / threshold), structured outputs, Message Batches, token counting, vision / PDF, Files API, citations, embeddings (Voyage AI), errors, rate limits, beta headers, Bedrock / Vertex AI / Foundry 経由アクセス。
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Shakes your mental models with critical rigor, challenges assumptions, exposes blind spots, and provides multi-perspective insights as a strict thinking mentor. Deliberately breaks format conventions to stimulate genuine cognitive discomfort. Use when you want to stress-test an idea, shake your mental model, ask to challenge my assumptions, find blind spots, deepen my thinking, or request critical review with phrases like yusaburi or what do you think of this plan.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Break a stuck or complex problem into the smallest sub-question that, if answered, unlocks the next step — then answer it and repeat until the path forward is clear. Load when a problem feels genuinely stuck, when reasoning keeps circling, or when deep-thinking diagnoses a Socratic frame. Also triggers on "I keep going in circles", "what is the real question here", "help me reason through this step by step", "unstick my thinking", "recursive questioning", "what is the root question". Based on the recursive Socratic questioning method (EMNLP 2023) which outperforms CoT and Tree-of-Thought on complex reasoning tasks.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Think through the consequences of consequences — not just what happens immediately, but what happens next, and next after that, across time. Load when a decision looks obviously good or obviously bad on initial read, when the user is optimising for a short-term outcome that might create a long-term problem, when unintended consequences are a concern, or when deep-thinking diagnoses a second-order frame. Triggers on "what are the downstream effects", "what happens after that", "unintended consequences", "think ahead on this", "long-term vs short-term", or "what comes after that". Based on Howard Marks second-level thinking and Farnam Street mental models. Most powerful for decisions with delayed consequences or systemic effects.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
スキルを作成・更新・プロンプト改善するためのメタスキル。 **collaborative**モードでユーザーと対話しながら共創し、 抽象的なアイデアから具体的な実装まで柔軟に対応する。 **orchestrate**モードでタスクの実行エンジン（Claude Code / Codex / 連携）を選択。 Anchors: • Continuous Delivery (Jez Humble) / 適用: 自動化パイプライン / 目的: 決定論的実行 • The Lean Startup (Eric Ries) / 適用: Build-Measure-Learn / 目的: 反復改善 • Domain-Driven Design (Eric Evans) / 適用: ユビキタス言語 / 目的: 一貫した語彙 • Design Thinking (IDEO) / 適用: ユーザー中心設計 / 目的: 共感と共創 • Microservices Patterns (Richardson) / 適用: サービス委譲 / 目的: 疎結合な連携 Trigger: 新規スキルの作成、既存スキルの更新、プロンプト改善を行う場合に使用。 スキル作成, スキル更新, プロンプト改善, skill creation, skill update, improve prompt, Codexに任せて, assign codex, Codexで実行, GPTに依頼, 実行モード選択, どのAIを使う
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Decision validation and thinking frameworks for startup founders. Use when you need to pressure-test a decision, validate your next steps, think through strategic options, or sanity-check your approach. Triggers on phrases like "should I", "help me think through", "is this the right move", "validate my thinking", "what am I missing". Covers fundraising, customer development, runway management, prioritization, and crypto/web3 founder challenges.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Operating discipline distilled from Claude Fable 5 for sessions and subagents on weaker models (Opus 4.x, Sonnet 5/4.x, Haiku 4.5) doing agentic coding. Load it at the START of any non-trivial task when not running on Fable 5. Операционная дисциплина мышления Fable 5 для менее сильных моделей. Загружай в начале любой нетривиальной задачи (дебаг, рефакторинг, ≥2 файлов, незнакомый код), когда работаешь НЕ на Fable 5 — и указывай сабагенту на Opus/Sonnet/Haiku прочитать этот скилл вместе с нетривиальным заданием. Триггеры — «думай как Fable», «fable-mode», «включи дисциплину», «работай аккуратно», запуск сабагента на слабой модели, повторяющиеся ошибки/переделки в сессии. НЕ нужен для тривиальных правок (rename, опечатка, one-liner) и чисто разговорных ответов.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Operating discipline distilled from Claude Fable 5 for sessions and subagents on weaker models (Opus 4.x, Sonnet 5/4.x, Haiku 4.5) doing agentic coding. Load it at the START of any non-trivial task when not running on Fable 5: debugging, refactoring, changes across 2+ files, or unfamiliar code; and instruct a subagent on Opus/Sonnet/Haiku to read this skill with a non-trivial assignment. Triggers include "think like Fable", "fable-mode", "turn on discipline", "work carefully", dispatching a subagent on a weaker model, and repeated mistakes or rework in the session. NOT needed for trivial edits (rename, typo, one-liner) or purely conversational answers.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
通过逐轮提问深入检验计划或想法，为问题附上建议答案，整理决策之间的依赖关系，确认模糊前提和待定事项，在行动前建立共同理解。