201 个 · 按相关度排序
用户要找对标账号/分析竞品爆款/找差异化选题时;或问"怎么做AI工具赛道的差异化""how to find benchmarks / differentiate"时。按5步走:找3-5个低粉高爆对标(搜索from:xxx min_faves:10)→分析90天爆款抓隐性需求→学互动策略→拆变现模式→三公式变形(场景细化/人群聚焦/观点反转)出差异。不适用于:已有定位日常发内容(→x-short-content-craft)、纠结选IP还是泛流量(→x-positioning-tradeoff)、检查草稿(→x-five-piece-checklist)、纯信息查询。
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarks Use when: agent testing, agent evaluation, benchmark agents, agent reliability, test agent.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Expert competitive analyst specializing in competitor intelligence, strategic analysis, and market positioning. Masters competitive benchmarking, SWOT analysis, and strategic recommendations with focus on creating sustainable competitive advantages.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Expert FinOps guidance for cloud, AI, and SaaS technology spend. Covers AI cost management, agentic FinOps, GenAI capacity planning, self-hosted vs managed inference, Anthropic billing, open-weight vendor APIs (DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi, GLM), AWS (EC2, Bedrock, SageMaker, Savings Plans, CUR), Azure (reservations, AHB, OpenAI PTUs), GCP (Vertex AI, BigQuery), OCI, Kubernetes cost allocation, data platforms (Databricks, Fabric F-SKUs, Snowflake), tagging governance, SaaS management (SAM, shadow IT), AI coding tools (Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot, Codex), ITAM, allocation, showback, chargeback, anomaly management, KPIs and benchmarking, waste detection playbooks, workload onboarding and M&A, and GreenOps (cloud carbon, CSRD). Use for any question about technology cost or waste in your estate - expiring commitments or RIs, NAT gateway bills, idle VMs, snapshot sprawl - and for commitment sizing, rightsizing, allocation, SaaS sprawl, AI dev tool spend, or connecting spend to business value. Built by OptimNow.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Nature-style engineering manuscript reviewer skill for testing devices, robots, platforms, systems, algorithms embodied in physical systems and engineering methods against requirements, validation, benchmarking, uncertainty, robustness and failure modes.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Rates any SKILL.md on a 0-100 scale across 10 dimensions with a SHIP / REWORK / SCRAP verdict. Evaluates trigger precision, instruction clarity, output predictability, edge case coverage, anti-hallucination guardrails, developer experience, composability, open-source readiness, wow factor, and real-world utility. No flattery — calibrated against Anthropic's own skill-creator rubric. Use this skill whenever someone says "score this skill", "rate my skill", "is this skill good", "skill review", "skill audit", "roast my SKILL.md", "grade this", "will this skill work", "evaluate my skill", "how good is this", or pastes a SKILL.md and asks for feedback. Also trigger when comparing two skills, benchmarking a skill collection, or asking "what's wrong with this skill" — even without the word "score".
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when benchmarking, profiling, or A/B-testing CUDA kernels or end-to-end perf in the imp inference engine on RTX 5090 (sm_120), including refreshing tests/perf_baseline.json or publishing numbers to docs/BENCHMARKS.md and the README. Triggers on "benchmark kernel", "profile cuda", "ncu", "nsys", "kernel timing", "kernel sum", "occupancy", "bandwidth bound", "compute bound", "roofline", "perf baseline", "is this regression real", "decode dropped", "aggregate throughput", "two-image A/B", "prefill kernel A/B". Do NOT use for writing/optimizing kernel code (sm120-cuda-expert) or output-quality checks (check-degeneration).
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when building imp, running its test suite, checking CI status, or debugging build/test failures - "make build", "run the tests", "test-gpu", "verify-fast", GTEST_FILTER, Docker/CUDA toolchain, dependency bumps, "CI is red/blocked", "which gate failed", stale objects / segfault after a header edit, hook edits, docker-entrypoint env vars, determinism or perplexity checks. Do NOT use for benchmarking/profiling (benchmark-cuda) or output-quality batteries (check-degeneration).
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Computes fund performance with gross/net IRR, MOIC, DPI, RVPI, TVPI, PME, and direct alpha methodologies. Use when calculating fund performance, reconciling return metrics, or benchmarking against peer groups.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Evaluates structured product tranche pricing with spread analysis, yield attribution, and comparable structure benchmarking. Use when assessing tranche value, comparing structured product pricing, or analyzing spread components.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Deconstructs SaaS operating metrics including ARR, NRR, gross retention, magic number, rule of 40, and cohort economics. Use when analyzing SaaS businesses, benchmarking software metrics, or evaluating subscription model health.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Monitors secondary market pricing trends with discount/premium analysis, bid-ask spreads, and market-clearing dynamics. Use when analyzing secondary pricing, tracking market trends, or benchmarking transaction levels.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Evaluates transportation assets with ridership analysis, fare structure assessment, and operating efficiency benchmarking. Use when analyzing transportation projects, evaluating mass transit, or assessing toll road economics.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Constructs fund-level performance reporting with IRR, MOIC, DPI, RVPI, PME, and vintage year benchmarking. Use when building fund reports, calculating performance metrics, or preparing LP reporting packages.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Values infrastructure assets with DCF, regulated asset base, and comparable transaction methodologies adjusted for regulatory and contractual frameworks. Use when valuing infrastructure assets, analyzing regulated utilities, or benchmarking infra transactions.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Evaluates credit fund returns with yield attribution, mark-to-market dynamics, and performance comparison across credit strategies. Use when analyzing credit fund performance, decomposing returns, or benchmarking credit strategies.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Deploy machine learning models to edge devices using Google AI Edge Gallery, TensorFlow Lite, ONNX Runtime, and MediaPipe. Covers model quantization (INT8/INT4), on-device inference with Gemma 4 models, Android/iOS deployment via AI Edge Gallery, hardware delegate selection (GPU/NPU/DSP), and performance benchmarking on constrained devices. Use when deploying models to mobile phones, IoT devices, or embedded systems where cloud inference is impractical due to latency, cost, or connectivity constraints.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Competitive reputation benchmarking against direct competitors
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when implementing pool/slab/arena allocators, tuning jemalloc/mimalloc/tcmalloc, writing a Rust GlobalAlloc, or benchmarking allocator performance and fragmentation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when writing, optimizing, or benchmarking a C++ CPU kernel with AVX2 or AVX512 intrinsics for the Hugging Face kernels ecosystem. Not for CUDA kernels: use cuda.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
When the user wants help with pricing decisions, packaging, monetization strategy, or subscription models. Also use when the user mentions 'pricing', 'price', 'monetization', 'freemium', 'Van Westendorp', 'how much should I charge', 'pricing tiers', 'good-better-best', 'SaaS pricing', 'subscription model', 'free vs paid', 'packaging', 'pricing page', 'annual vs monthly', or is deciding between free and paid models. Make sure to use this whenever someone is making ANY pricing decision — even questions like 'should I charge for this?' or 'is freemium right for us?' or 'my conversion rate is low, is it the price?' are pricing strategy questions. Covers value-based pricing, tier structure, price psychology, and competitor benchmarking.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when validating, benchmarking, or monitoring LLM application performance. Keywords: RAG evaluation, LLM-as-a-judge, CI/CD gating, trajectory scoring, test suites, prompt quality.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Perform triangulated cognitive research combining SQLite memory, GitHub 10k+ stars patterns, and ToT DAG benchmarking before critical architectural decisions. Automatically triggers subagent research escalation when confidence is low (<0.70). Keywords: research, benchmark, github, memory, triangulation, grounding, best-practices, escalation
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Compensation and Benefits Manager — designing or evaluating a pay structure/leveling system, benchmarking compensation against market, deciding on a benefits package tradeoff, or auditing for pay equity issues. Narrower and more specialized than the broader hr-people-manager role's compensation-adjacent heuristics.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。