129 个 · 按相关度排序
Investigate why a PyTorch model behaves a certain way by changing its internal values with pyvene. The skill guides experiments that swap or remove activations, train interventions, compare outputs, and save or share intervention configurations.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Guides experiments that change internal values in PyTorch models to test what causes their behavior. Uses pyvene to swap or remove activations, locate influential components, train interventions, and save experiments for reuse.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Detect crisis signals in user content using NLP, mental health sentiment analysis, and safe intervention protocols. Implements suicide ideation detection, automated escalation, and crisis resource integration. Use for mental health apps, recovery platforms, support communities. Activate on "crisis detection", "suicide prevention", "mental health NLP", "intervention protocol". NOT for general sentiment analysis, medical diagnosis, or replacing professional help.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Provides guidance for performing causal interventions on PyTorch models using pyvene's declarative intervention framework. Use when conducting causal tracing, activation patching, interchange intervention training, or testing causal hypotheses about model behavior.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Detect crisis signals in user content using NLP, mental health sentiment analysis, and safe intervention protocols. Implements suicide ideation detection, automated escalation, and crisis resource integration. Use for mental health apps, recovery platforms, support communities. Activate on "crisis detection", "suicide prevention", "mental health NLP", "intervention protocol". NOT for general sentiment analysis, medical diagnosis, or replacing professional help.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Estimate how an intervention affects outcomes using Bayesian causal analysis. The workflow confirms causal assumptions with the user, selects a suitable method, checks whether findings withstand challenges, and reports effects with uncertainty and limitations.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Build a tiered classroom behavior intervention plan (BIP) for a K-12 student, grounded in the function of the behavior. Use when asked to plan a behavior intervention, address a disruptive or off-task pattern, write a BIP, or set up positive behavior supports. Produces a function hypothesis, prevention/antecedent strategies, teaching of a replacement behavior, a response plan for when it happens, and a simple data-tracking method — positive and skill-building, not punitive.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Guides God Committee members through executing interventions. Use for repairs, rollbacks, and emergency actions. Triggers on: intervention, repair, rollback, emergency action.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
侍酒师与葡萄酒 (侍酒师 / 葡萄酒 (Sommelier & Wine) — 葡萄酒鉴赏 + 侍酒服务的职业认知操作系统，从业者/侍酒师/学习者视角。覆盖: (a) 两大认证体系张力 — WSET (Wine & Spirit Education Trust, 英国, 知识+SAT 系统化品鉴方法, Diploma/L4 笔试导向) vs Court of Master Sommeliers (CMS, 美/英, 服务+盲品演绎法+理论三位一体, MS 头衔), 外加 Institute of Masters of Wine (MW, 学术研究+论文) 与 UC Davis 葡萄酒学/葡萄栽培学学院派; (b) 盲品 = 纯 tacit 校准技能 — 演绎品鉴网格 (deductive tasting: 看色/闻香/品味 → 结构线索 calculated structure → 推断品种/产区/年份/酒龄), WSET SAT vs CMS deductive grid 两套方法论; (c) 第一性张力 — codifiable 理论层 (产区/品种/酒法/风土/酿造/葡萄栽培) ⇄ tacit 校准层 (品鉴味觉记忆/盲品/侍酒服务), 这行的核心矛盾是「可背诵的知识」与「不可言传的味觉」之间; (d) 旧世界 vs 新世界框架 — 旧世界以风土/法定产区为组织原则 (AOC/DOCG/QbA 分级法), 新世界以品种为标签; 风土 (terroir) 是核心组织概念; (e) 侍酒服务/酒店层 — 餐厅 floor 的配餐 (food pairing)、醒酒/侍酒温度、酒单与酒窖管理、by-the-glass 与饮品项目经济学、盲品 service exam; (f) 葡萄酒商业层 — 三级分销体系 (美国 three-tier)、定价/配额 (allocation)、期酒 (en primeur)、投资酒 (Liv-ex) 与拍卖; (g) 智识/品味演进 — 帕克百分制 (Robert Parker / Wine Advocate 100-point) vs Jancis Robinson 20 分制散文派; 经典派 vs 现代派酿造; 自然酒/低干预 (natural/minimal-intervention) vs 传统技术派. 学派分歧: WSET 知识体系派 vs CMS 服务盲品派、旧世界风土派 vs 新世界品种/技术派、自然酒派 vs 传统派、百分制点评派 vs 散文叙述派、经典平衡派 vs 浓郁现代派. 不含: 家庭自酿 DIY 套件、纯调酒/鸡尾酒/烈酒、葡萄园重型农机工程、酒精成瘾/公共卫生政策、酒类电商运营纯营销。) Master OS — automated mastery of 侍酒师 / 葡萄酒 (Sommelier & Wine) — 葡萄酒鉴赏 + 侍酒服务的职业认知操作系统，从业者/侍酒师/学习者视角。覆盖: (a) 两大认证体系张力 — WSET (Wine & Spirit Education Trust, 英国, 知识+SAT 系统化品鉴方法, Diploma/L4 笔试导向) vs Court of Master Sommeliers (CMS, 美/英, 服务+盲品演绎法+理论三位一体, MS 头衔), 外加 Institute of Masters of Wine (MW, 学术研究+论文) 与 UC Davis 葡萄酒学/葡萄栽培学学院派; (b) 盲品 = 纯 tacit 校准技能 — 演绎品鉴网格 (deductive tasting: 看色/闻香/品味 → 结构线索 calculated structure → 推断品种/产区/年份/酒龄), WSET SAT vs CMS deductive grid 两套方法论; (c) 第一性张力 — codifiable 理论层 (产区/品种/酒法/风土/酿造/葡萄栽培) ⇄ tacit 校准层 (品鉴味觉记忆/盲品/侍酒服务), 这行的核心矛盾是「可背诵的知识」与「不可言传的味觉」之间; (d) 旧世界 vs 新世界框架 — 旧世界以风土/法定产区为组织原则 (AOC/DOCG/QbA 分级法), 新世界以品种为标签; 风土 (terroir) 是核心组织概念; (e) 侍酒服务/酒店层 — 餐厅 floor 的配餐 (food pairing)、醒酒/侍酒温度、酒单与酒窖管理、by-the-glass 与饮品项目经济学、盲品 service exam; (f) 葡萄酒商业层 — 三级分销体系 (美国 three-tier)、定价/配额 (allocation)、期酒 (en primeur)、投资酒 (Liv-ex) 与拍卖; (g) 智识/品味演进 — 帕克百分制 (Robert Parker / Wine Advocate 100-point) vs Jancis Robinson 20 分制散文派; 经典派 vs 现代派酿造; 自然酒/低干预 (natural/minimal-intervention) vs 传统技术派. 学派分歧: WSET 知识体系派 vs CMS 服务盲品派、旧世界风土派 vs 新世界品种/技术派、自然酒派 vs 传统派、百分制点评派 vs 散文叙述派、经典平衡派 vs 浓郁现代派. 不含: 家庭自酿 DIY 套件、纯调酒/鸡尾酒/烈酒、葡萄园重型农机工程、酒精成瘾/公共卫生政策、酒类电商运营纯营销。: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on 侍酒师 / 葡萄酒 (Sommelier & Wine) — 葡萄酒鉴赏 + 侍酒服务的职业认知操作系统，从业者/侍酒师/学习者视角。覆盖: (a) 两大认证体系张力 — WSET (Wine & Spirit Education Trust, 英国, 知识+SAT 系统化品鉴方法, Diploma/L4 笔试导向) vs Court of Master Sommeliers (CMS, 美/英, 服务+盲品演绎法+理论三位一体, MS 头衔), 外加 Institute of Masters of Wine (MW, 学术研究+论文) 与 UC Davis 葡萄酒学/葡萄栽培学学院派; (b) 盲品 = 纯 tacit 校准技能 — 演绎品鉴网格 (deductive tasting: 看色/闻香/品味 → 结构线索 calculated structure → 推断品种/产区/年份/酒龄), WSET SAT vs CMS deductive grid 两套方法论; (c) 第一性张力 — codifiable 理论层 (产区/品种/酒法/风土/酿造/葡萄栽培) ⇄ tacit 校准层 (品鉴味觉记忆/盲品/侍酒服务), 这行的核心矛盾是「可背诵的知识」与「不可言传的味觉」之间; (d) 旧世界 vs 新世界框架 — 旧世界以风土/法定产区为组织原则 (AOC/DOCG/QbA 分级法), 新世界以品种为标签; 风土 (terroir) 是核心组织概念; (e) 侍酒服务/酒店层 — 餐厅 floor 的配餐 (food pairing)、醒酒/侍酒温度、酒单与酒窖管理、by-the-glass 与饮品项目经济学、盲品 service exam; (f) 葡萄酒商业层 — 三级分销体系 (美国 three-tier)、定价/配额 (allocation)、期酒 (en primeur)、投资酒 (Liv-ex) 与拍卖; (g) 智识/品味演进 — 帕克百分制 (Robert Parker / Wine Advocate 100-point) vs Jancis Robinson 20 分制散文派; 经典派 vs 现代派酿造; 自然酒/低干预 (natural/minimal-intervention) vs 传统技术派. 学派分歧: WSET 知识体系派 vs CMS 服务盲品派、旧世界风土派 vs 新世界品种/技术派、自然酒派 vs 传统派、百分制点评派 vs 散文叙述派、经典平衡派 vs 浓郁现代派. 不含: 家庭自酿 DIY 套件、纯调酒/鸡尾酒/烈酒、葡萄园重型农机工程、酒精成瘾/公共卫生政策、酒类电商运营纯营销。 problems and wants industry-grade thinking, tool selection, or workflow guidance. 触发词：「侍酒师」「sommelier」「葡萄酒」「wine」「盲品」
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Plan and analyze A/B tests, prepare tabular data, and train and evaluate prediction models. Estimate intervention effects from observational data, track model experiments with MLflow, and translate statistical findings into business decisions.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Write SQL that uses BigQuery’s built-in machine learning and generative AI for forecasting, anomaly detection, identifying drivers of change, searching by meaning, and classifying or summarizing text stored in your data.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Monitor other agent teams for abandoned work, process drift, off-task activity, and excessive token use. It guides evidence checks after alerts and chooses a proportionate response, from notifying the team’s coordinator to escalating to a human.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Design OpenRig watchdog policies for stalled or drifting agent work. Choose a small wake-up message, a refocus, or a broader alignment check, and separate monitoring frequency from notification frequency using evidence about owners and artifacts.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Analyze whether an intervention causes an outcome using DoWhy in Python. Build a graph of causal assumptions, determine whether the effect can be estimated, compare estimates, and test how well results withstand changes to assumptions or data.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Produce a structured churn analysis that separates avoidable from unavoidable churn. Use when investigating why customers are leaving, identifying at-risk segments, calculating net revenue retention, or building a retention intervention plan. Produces a churn report with rate calculations, categorised reasons by avoidability, segment breakdown, timing analysis, early warning signals, and prioritised interventions ranked by estimated impact.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Draft a clinical trial protocol synopsis with the elements regulators and IRBs expect. Use when asked to write a clinical trial protocol, a study protocol synopsis, a trial design, or to structure endpoints/eligibility/statistics for an interventional study. Produces a structured protocol synopsis — objectives, design, population with eligibility, interventions, endpoints, statistics, and safety/ethics — for expert review. (For non-clinical/UX research, use research-protocol.)
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Map systemic forces shaping a wellbeing concern without individualising the problem. Uses Bronfenbrenner's ecological model and social determinants to generate structural interventions.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Design a wise systems intervention from an existing analysis. Maps proposed actions against Meadows' leverage points, checks for unintended consequences, and generates alternatives.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Causal inference specialist for causal discovery, counterfactual reasoning, and effect estimationUse when "causal inference, causal discovery, counterfactual, intervention effect, confounder, structural causal model, SCM, dowhy, causal graph, causal, dowhy, scm, dag, counterfactual, intervention, causalnex, confounding, ml-memory" mentioned.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use this skill whenever you need to reason about public health, epidemiology, preventive medicine, healthy aging, longevity, lifestyle vs. genetics, or dietary patterns. Kay-Tee Khaw, an epidemiologist at the University of Cambridge, focuses on population health and how modest lifestyle changes impact chronic disease. Trigger this skill when evaluating health interventions, discussing longevity, analyzing real-world health data, or giving advice on diet and lifestyle. Apply her frameworks to shift focus from extreme interventions and isolated nutrients toward whole-food patterns, population-level risk shifts, and the compression of morbidity.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Map systemic forces shaping a wellbeing concern without individualising the problem. Uses Bronfenbrenner's ecological model and social determinants to generate structural interventions.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Design a wise systems intervention from an existing analysis. Maps proposed actions against Meadows' leverage points, checks for unintended consequences, and generates alternatives.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Churn risk identification and intervention — scans health signals for at-risk accounts, classifies risk level (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM), and produces an intervention sequence per risk type. Use when asked to "find at-risk accounts", "who might churn", "build a churn prevention plan", "identify churn signals", or "rescue this account".
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Economic analysis of government intervention -- taxation (incidence, efficiency, optimal design), regulation (cost-benefit, market failure correction), externalities (Pigouvian taxation, cap-and-trade, Coasian bargaining), and public goods provision (non-rivalry, non-excludability, free-rider problem). Covers welfare analysis of policy interventions, government failure, and the institutional context of policy-making. Use when evaluating policy proposals, analyzing tax effects, assessing regulatory design, or reasoning about the appropriate scope of government action.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。