“technical-documentation”的搜索结果

用于编写和审查技术文档及面向智能体、贡献者的指令文件，检查说明是否清楚、操作流程是否正确，以及多语言版本是否一致，并修复有充分依据的问题。

• 编写或更新技术文档
• 审查README及文档变更
• 统一智能体指令与贡献流程

重组OpenClaw现有文档，对照源代码、结构定义和测试核实功能说明，保留准确细节，将详细规格移至合适页面，并验证链接与格式。

• 保留规格说明并缩短页面
• 将详细规格拆分至参考页面
• 使说明符合当前CLI行为

Create and review technical documentation alongside repository instructions for agents and contributors. The skill checks clarity, working procedures, documentation coverage, and consistency across languages, then provides updated drafts or findings with validation notes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Creating or updating technical documentation
• Reviewing README files and documentation changes
• Aligning agent instructions with contribution procedures

Audit, write, and improve developer documentation using Google's Developer Documentation Style Guide and Technical Writing courses. Use this skill for any documentation work, even when the user names no style guide: "audit our docs", "review this README", "write a README", "getting started guide", "how-to or tutorial", "API reference", "docstrings", "CLI help text", "changelog or release notes", "migration guide", or "our docs are confusing". Also use it when writing docs from code, rewriting a doc for clarity, fixing headings, procedures, or code samples, or enforcing consistent voice and terminology across a docs set — prefer it over editing documentation unaided. Covers reader and doc-type fit, second person and active voice, procedures, headings, lists and tables, code samples and placeholders, link text, notices, the word list, timeless docs, and accessibility. For code comments and naming, see clean-code. For marketing or landing-page copy, see storybrand-messaging.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Write, review, or restructure Windows node documentation and agent instructions using current source, task-focused explanations, and explicit fact preservation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Preparing EU AI Act compliance documentation for high-risk AI systems. Covers Annex III classification, technical documentation under Art. 11, conformity assessment, risk management systems, and CE marking requirements. Keywords: EU AI Act, high-risk AI, Annex III, conformity assessment, CE marking.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Perform a diff-scoped, behavior-neutral cleanup of AI-generated slop on the current branch before code review. Use for removing trivial comment, defensive-check, type-laundering, redundant-intermediate, compatibility-shim, or local style drift from the branch diff. Do not use for full correctness or safety review, documentation work handled by technical-documentation or docs-refactor, or repo-wide refactors.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Refactor a whole documentation page in this repository without losing source-verified behavior facts. Use for page rewrites, splits, reorganizations, or substantial shortening of README sections, docs pages, or instruction files. Do not use for ordinary documentation authoring, targeted corrections, or documentation review; use technical-documentation instead.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Write, review, or audit this repository's technical documentation, including README.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, root and scoped AGENTS.md files, docs pages, and documentation drift. Use for source-backed documentation authoring, behavior verification, and cross-surface consistency. Do not use for code review, deslop diff cleanup, or whole-page rewrites, splits, or reorganizations handled by docs-refactor.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。