依据WCAG 2.2设计和检查Web、iOS及Android界面,核查读屏标签、键盘操作、配色对比度和操作目标尺寸,使界面支持辅助技术。
- 为纯图标按钮添加说明
- 检查键盘操作与模态框焦点
- 检查对比度与操作目标尺寸
帮助医疗应用分类患者、员工及财务敏感信息,设计按医疗机构划分的行级访问控制和审计记录,并检查日志、网址及浏览器存储中的信息泄露。
Protected Health Information (PHI) and PII compliance patterns for healthcare applications: data classification, row-level access control, tamper-proof audit trails, schema tagging, and common leak vectors such as logs, URLs, and browser storage. Use when code touches patient or clinician data, when implementing HIPAA or GDPR access controls, or when auditing a healthcare system for data exposure.
帮助保护医疗应用中的患者、医护人员及财务敏感信息。分类PHI,即可识别个人身份的健康信息,以及PII,即敏感个人信息,并在数据库列上记录信息类别。通过行级访问控制限制各医疗机构的数据查看范围,同时设计审计记录,记录谁查看、修改或导出了信息。
适合开发处理患者记录的功能或API、隔离多家医疗机构的数据,以及检查可能泄露信息的代码。可检查错误消息、日志、网址和浏览器存储等容易留下信息的位置。资料还提供发布前检查项,以及验证机构间访问控制的示例。
实现模式考虑HIPAA、DISHA和GDPR等要求,SQL示例采用行级访问控制。不得将service_role密钥放入客户端,也不应将PHI存入localStorage或sessionStorage。日志等位置使用内部识别用的UUID,不使用患者姓名或病历号。
本介绍由 AI(OpenAI Codex)根据公开的 SKILL.md 撰写。准确的规格请查看下方原文。
AI 仅根据 SKILL.md 的内容,从 4 个方面进行了评估。星标数和热度不计入评估。
总分按每项 A=25 分、B=15 分、C=5 分相加。 由 AI(OpenAI Codex)于 2026年10月19日 评估。仅供参考,安装前请同时查看原文。
安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Patterns for protecting patient data, clinician data, and financial data in healthcare applications. Applicable to HIPAA (US), DISHA (India), GDPR (EU), and general healthcare data protection.
Healthcare data protection operates on three layers: classification (what is sensitive), access control (who can see it), and audit (who did see it).
PHI (Protected Health Information) — any data that can identify a patient AND relates to their health: patient name, date of birth, address, phone, email, national ID numbers (SSN, Aadhaar, NHS number), medical record numbers, diagnoses, medications, lab results, imaging, insurance policy and claim details, appointment and admission records, or any combination of the above.
PII (Non-patient-sensitive data) in healthcare systems: clinician/staff personal details, doctor fee structures and payout amounts, employee salary and bank details, vendor payment information.
ALTER TABLE patients ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY;
-- Scope access by facility
CREATE POLICY "staff_read_own_facility"
ON patients FOR SELECT TO authenticated
USING (facility_id IN (
SELECT facility_id FROM staff_assignments
WHERE user_id = auth.uid() AND role IN ('doctor','nurse','lab_tech','admin')
));
-- Audit log: insert-only (tamper-proof)
CREATE POLICY "audit_insert_only" ON audit_log FOR INSERT
TO authenticated WITH CHECK (user_id = auth.uid());
CREATE POLICY "audit_no_modify" ON audit_log FOR UPDATE USING (false);
CREATE POLICY "audit_no_delete" ON audit_log FOR DELETE USING (false);
Every PHI access or modification must be logged:
interface AuditEntry {
timestamp: string;
user_id: string;
patient_id: string;
action: 'create' | 'read' | 'update' | 'delete' | 'print' | 'export';
resource_type: string;
resource_id: string;
changes?: { before: object; after: object };
ip_address: string;
session_id: string;
}
Error messages: Never include patient-identifying data in error messages thrown to the client. Log details server-side only.
Console output: Never log full patient objects. Use opaque internal record IDs (UUIDs) — not medical record numbers, national IDs, or names.
URL parameters: Never put patient-identifying data in query strings or path segments that could appear in logs or browser history. Use opaque UUIDs only.
Browser storage: Never store PHI in localStorage or sessionStorage. Keep PHI in memory only, fetch on demand.
Service role keys: Never use the service_role key in client-side code. Always use the anon/publishable key and let RLS enforce access.
Logs and monitoring: Never log full patient records. Use opaque record IDs only (not medical record numbers). Sanitize stack traces before sending to error tracking services.
Mark PHI/PII columns at the schema level:
COMMENT ON COLUMN patients.name IS 'PHI: patient_name';
COMMENT ON COLUMN patients.dob IS 'PHI: date_of_birth';
COMMENT ON COLUMN patients.aadhaar IS 'PHI: national_id';
COMMENT ON COLUMN doctor_payouts.amount IS 'PII: financial';
Before every deployment:
// BAD — leaks PHI in error
throw new Error(`Patient ${patient.name} not found in ${patient.facility}`);
// GOOD — generic error, details logged server-side with opaque IDs only
logger.error('Patient lookup failed', { recordId: patient.id, facilityId });
throw new Error('Record not found');
-- Doctor at Facility A cannot see Facility B patients
CREATE POLICY "facility_isolation"
ON patients FOR SELECT TO authenticated
USING (facility_id IN (
SELECT facility_id FROM staff_assignments WHERE user_id = auth.uid()
));
-- Test: login as doctor-facility-a, query facility-b patients
-- Expected: 0 rows returned
// BAD — logs identifiable patient data
console.log('Processing patient:', patient);
// GOOD — logs only opaque internal record ID
console.log('Processing record:', patient.id);
// Note: even patient.id should be an opaque UUID, not a medical record number
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
依据WCAG 2.2设计和检查Web、iOS及Android界面,核查读屏标签、键盘操作、配色对比度和操作目标尺寸,使界面支持辅助技术。
从指令、记忆、工具执行和界面显示等十二个层面排查人工智能代理故障,依据代码和日志梳理原因,按严重程度列出问题并提出修复方案。
用实际开发任务比较多个编程智能体,记录成功率、可获取的API费用、耗时和重复运行的稳定性,为工具选型及更新后的性能评估提供数据。
设计和调整AI智能体使用的工具、输入与返回格式,明确出错后的恢复、重试和停止条件,管理上下文信息量,并以完成率、重试次数和成功任务成本评估改进。
在AI代理反复失败或重复操作时,记录错误与环境前提、排查原因,采取影响有限的恢复操作,并汇总结果和证据,为有依据的重试与交接提供支持。
根据错误信息和执行环境,分析AI代理反复失败或重复操作的原因。通过小范围、可撤销的恢复操作检验假设,并将结果与依据整理成可供交接的报告。