跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

critique-vocabulary

Precise language for design feedback. Ban vague words. Name what you actually see. Use when giving design feedback, running critiques, or training teams to communicate about quality.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md1.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Critique Vocabulary

Say exactly what you mean. Kill vague words.

How to use

  • /critique-vocabulary Apply precise vocabulary constraints to all design feedback in this conversation.

Constraints

Banned Words

  • NEVER use these in design feedback: clean, modern, sleek, nice, cool, interesting, beautiful, ugly, minimal, bold, intuitive, seamless, stunning, pop, vibe
  • MUST replace every banned word with a specific observation about hierarchy, weight, rhythm, density, contrast, proportion, consistency, or spacing

Replacement Vocabulary

Instead of...Use...
"It feels cluttered""The information density is high relative to the content hierarchy. Nothing signals where to start."
"It looks boring""The visual rhythm is flat. Every section has the same scale and spacing."
"Make it pop""The CTA doesn't have enough visual separation from surrounding elements."
"Something feels off""The spacing between these groups seems inconsistent. Is this relationship intentional?"
"It's not polished""The border radius is inconsistent between these elements."
"Explore other directions""The current approach prioritizes X. What happens if we prioritize Y instead?"

Feedback Structure

  • MUST use: Observation > Principle > Question
  • Observation: what you specifically see
  • Principle: why it matters
  • Question: what to explore (not what to do)

Anti-Patterns

  • Giving feedback in the form of commands ("make the button blue")
  • Using technical jargon to sound authoritative without actually being specific
  • Being vague-positive ("looks great!") which teaches nothing

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Notice what's deliberately missing from a design. Restraint is a taste signal. Use when studying minimalist products, evaluating design maturity, or understanding the power of removal.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Dragoon0x/taste-skills62026年2月27日 更新

Explain the same design observation to a designer, a developer, and a non-technical stakeholder. Same insight, three languages. Use when working cross-functionally or presenting design decisions to mixed audiences.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Dragoon0x/taste-skills62026年2月27日 更新

Palette roles, restraint, semantic consistency, and when fewer colors means better design. Use when building color palettes, evaluating color usage, or diagnosing color-related design problems.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Dragoon0x/taste-skills62026年2月27日 更新

Understand the constraints a design was built under and evaluate quality within that context. Use when reviewing work that had limited time, budget, or team size, or when assessing whether constraints were handled well.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Dragoon0x/taste-skills62026年2月27日 更新

Structured exposure habits for building taste through relentless, intentional consumption. Not passive scrolling. Active intake across design, architecture, film, music, food, and culture. Use when building a taste practice, advising on professional development, or diagnosing why someone's design range feels narrow.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Dragoon0x/taste-skills62026年2月27日 更新

Consistent radii, pixel-perfect alignment, state coverage, and the details that signal design quality. Use when polishing designs, auditing quality, or evaluating whether a design is ready to ship.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Dragoon0x/taste-skills62026年2月27日 更新

查看 Dragoon0x 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题