Notice what's deliberately missing from a design. Restraint is a taste signal. Use when studying minimalist products, evaluating design maturity, or understanding the power of removal.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Dragoon0x/taste-skills62026年2月27日 更新
免费在 GitHub 公开
design-ranking
Rank multiple design solutions and explain why. Separate personal preference from quality judgment. Use when comparing design options, evaluating competing approaches, or making design decisions with clear reasoning.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
实测评分 未实测
查看安装方法包含的文件（1）
- SKILL.md1.9 KB
SKILL.md（原文）
安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Design Ranking
Rank solutions. Explain the ranking. Separate preference from quality.
How to use
/design-rankingApply ranking constraints when comparing design options in this conversation.
Constraints
Ranking Structure
- MUST rank options explicitly (1st, 2nd, 3rd) with clear reasoning for each position
- MUST state the evaluation criteria before ranking (hierarchy clarity, user task fit, brand alignment, etc.)
- MUST distinguish between "I prefer this" and "this works better" with evidence
- NEVER rank based on visual style alone. Rank based on how well decisions serve the goals.
- SHOULD acknowledge what each option does well, even lower-ranked ones
Quality vs. Preference
- MUST separate personal taste from functional quality
- A dark theme you personally prefer can be worse for the specific use case than a light theme
- SHOULD name the user context when defending a ranking ("for first-time users," "for power users," "for this brand")
- NEVER let trend-alignment influence ranking. Something can be trending and wrong for this context.
Predictive Judgment
- SHOULD predict which option would perform better with real users and explain why
- MUST connect predictions to specific design decisions, not general feelings
- "Version B will have higher engagement because the CTA has more visual weight relative to surrounding elements"
Anti-Patterns
- Ranking everything as "they're all good in different ways" (commit to a judgment)
- Letting execution quality override conceptual quality (a polished bad idea is still a bad idea)
- Ranking based on what's trending rather than what serves the context
评价
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
评论
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问，或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
同一仓库的技能
Explain the same design observation to a designer, a developer, and a non-technical stakeholder. Same insight, three languages. Use when working cross-functionally or presenting design decisions to mixed audiences.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Dragoon0x/taste-skills62026年2月27日 更新
Palette roles, restraint, semantic consistency, and when fewer colors means better design. Use when building color palettes, evaluating color usage, or diagnosing color-related design problems.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Dragoon0x/taste-skills62026年2月27日 更新
Understand the constraints a design was built under and evaluate quality within that context. Use when reviewing work that had limited time, budget, or team size, or when assessing whether constraints were handled well.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Dragoon0x/taste-skills62026年2月27日 更新
Structured exposure habits for building taste through relentless, intentional consumption. Not passive scrolling. Active intake across design, architecture, film, music, food, and culture. Use when building a taste practice, advising on professional development, or diagnosing why someone's design range feels narrow.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Dragoon0x/taste-skills62026年2月27日 更新
Consistent radii, pixel-perfect alignment, state coverage, and the details that signal design quality. Use when polishing designs, auditing quality, or evaluating whether a design is ready to ship.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Dragoon0x/taste-skills62026年2月27日 更新