Notice what's deliberately missing from a design. Restraint is a taste signal. Use when studying minimalist products, evaluating design maturity, or understanding the power of removal.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Dragoon0x/taste-skills62026年2月27日 更新
免费在 GitHub 公开
taste-vs-trends
Tell the difference between design decisions that age well and decisions that follow the crowd. Use when evaluating whether a design choice is principled or fashionable, or when a client asks to 'make it look modern.'
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
实测评分 未实测
查看安装方法包含的文件（1）
- SKILL.md1.6 KB
SKILL.md（原文）
安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Taste vs. Trends
Separate decisions that last from decisions that expire.
How to use
/taste-vs-trendsApply taste-vs-trend analysis to any design decision in this conversation.
Constraints
The Three Tests
- Time test: Will this decision still make sense in 2 years? If not, it's a trend.
- Reasoning test: Does the "why" bottom out at "everyone's doing it" (trend) or "it serves the user this way" (taste)?
- Transfer test: Does the principle work across domains, or only in this medium? Principles transfer. Trends don't.
Evaluation Rules
- MUST identify whether a design decision is trend-driven or principle-driven
- MUST challenge "modern" as a design goal. Ask: modern for whom? Modern compared to what?
- SHOULD suggest principle-based alternatives when trend-following is identified
- NEVER dismiss trends entirely. They carry information about user expectations. Use them as inputs, not instructions.
Questions to Ask
- Does this trend solve a real problem for this specific context?
- What would I choose if nobody would ever see my portfolio post?
- Am I choosing this because it's right or because it's safe?
Anti-Patterns
- Calling everything trendy to seem sophisticated (some trends reflect genuine improvements)
- Rejecting contemporary approaches just to be contrarian
- Equating timelessness with conservatism (bold choices can age well too)
评价
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
评论
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问，或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
同一仓库的技能
Explain the same design observation to a designer, a developer, and a non-technical stakeholder. Same insight, three languages. Use when working cross-functionally or presenting design decisions to mixed audiences.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Dragoon0x/taste-skills62026年2月27日 更新
Palette roles, restraint, semantic consistency, and when fewer colors means better design. Use when building color palettes, evaluating color usage, or diagnosing color-related design problems.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Dragoon0x/taste-skills62026年2月27日 更新
Understand the constraints a design was built under and evaluate quality within that context. Use when reviewing work that had limited time, budget, or team size, or when assessing whether constraints were handled well.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Dragoon0x/taste-skills62026年2月27日 更新
Structured exposure habits for building taste through relentless, intentional consumption. Not passive scrolling. Active intake across design, architecture, film, music, food, and culture. Use when building a taste practice, advising on professional development, or diagnosing why someone's design range feels narrow.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Dragoon0x/taste-skills62026年2月27日 更新
Consistent radii, pixel-perfect alignment, state coverage, and the details that signal design quality. Use when polishing designs, auditing quality, or evaluating whether a design is ready to ship.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Dragoon0x/taste-skills62026年2月27日 更新