Notice what's deliberately missing from a design. Restraint is a taste signal. Use when studying minimalist products, evaluating design maturity, or understanding the power of removal.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Dragoon0x/taste-skills62026年2月27日 更新
免费在 GitHub 公开
type-systems
Scale, weight, line height, and tracking as a coherent system. Use when building type scales, auditing typography consistency, or diagnosing why text feels off.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
查看安装方法包含的文件（1）
- SKILL.md1.7 KB
SKILL.md（原文）
安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Type Systems
Typography is a system. Every decision should be intentional and connected.
How to use
/type-systemsApply type system constraints to this conversation.
Constraints
Scale
- MUST use a mathematical ratio for the type scale (1.25, 1.333, 1.5 between sizes)
- Wide range (12px to 72px): dramatic hierarchy, suits editorial and marketing
- Narrow range (14px to 24px): subtle hierarchy, suits dense products
- NEVER use random sizes. If it's not on the scale, it shouldn't exist.
- MUST limit to 4-6 sizes per screen maximum with clear justification for each
Weight
- 1-2 weights: discipline. Hierarchy comes from scale and space, not weight.
- 3 weights: normal range. Regular body, medium emphasis, bold headlines.
- 4+ weights: either the system demands it or you haven't made a decision.
- MUST ensure each weight serves a distinct, named purpose
Line Height
- Body text: 1.5-1.7x font size. Where readability lives.
- Headlines: 1.1-1.3x. Large text has built-in breathing room.
- UI labels: 1.2-1.4x. Compact but not crushed.
- NEVER use the same line height for all text sizes
Letter Spacing
- Body text: leave it alone. The type designer already optimized it.
- All-caps labels: add 2-5% tracking. Capitals need air.
- Large display text (72px+): sometimes benefits from tightening.
Anti-Patterns
- More than 3 type sizes on a single screen without clear hierarchy justification
- Centering paragraphs longer than 3 lines
- Lines over 75 characters wide (hurts readability)
- Inconsistent weight usage with no system behind it
评价
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
评论
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问，或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
同一仓库的技能
Explain the same design observation to a designer, a developer, and a non-technical stakeholder. Same insight, three languages. Use when working cross-functionally or presenting design decisions to mixed audiences.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Dragoon0x/taste-skills62026年2月27日 更新
Palette roles, restraint, semantic consistency, and when fewer colors means better design. Use when building color palettes, evaluating color usage, or diagnosing color-related design problems.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Dragoon0x/taste-skills62026年2月27日 更新
Understand the constraints a design was built under and evaluate quality within that context. Use when reviewing work that had limited time, budget, or team size, or when assessing whether constraints were handled well.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Dragoon0x/taste-skills62026年2月27日 更新
Structured exposure habits for building taste through relentless, intentional consumption. Not passive scrolling. Active intake across design, architecture, film, music, food, and culture. Use when building a taste practice, advising on professional development, or diagnosing why someone's design range feels narrow.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Dragoon0x/taste-skills62026年2月27日 更新
Consistent radii, pixel-perfect alignment, state coverage, and the details that signal design quality. Use when polishing designs, auditing quality, or evaluating whether a design is ready to ship.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Dragoon0x/taste-skills62026年2月27日 更新