跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

brand-research

Research a company or brand from its website and produce a reusable Brand Core covering products, audience, competitors, positioning, offers, messaging evidence, voice, and visual identity. Use before growth, ad, content, creator, or product work when reliable brand context is missing.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(14)

  • SKILL.md6.4 KB
  • .env.example607 B
  • examples/liquid-death-sparkling-water.md1.0 KB
  • examples/notion-calendar-with-ads.md1.1 KB
  • README.md2.8 KB
  • references/output-contract.md3.1 KB
  • requirements.txt249 B
  • scripts/fetch_asset.py2.5 KB
  • scripts/lib.py3.7 KB
  • scripts/register_asset.py1.2 KB
  • scripts/render_product_shot.py2.5 KB
  • scripts/scaffold_brand.py2.7 KB
  • scripts/verify_pack.py7.0 KB
  • skill.meta.json323 B

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Brand Research

Build a sourced Brand Core that future research, analysis, and creative workflows can reuse without rediscovering the company every time.

The required path is research-only and works with local files. GooseWorks sync, ad imports, and paid asset generation are optional extensions—not prerequisites for a complete result.

Inputs

  • website — required canonical company or brand website.
  • focus — optional product, collection, market, or campaign to prioritize.
  • output_dir — optional; defaults to a clearly named local brand folder.
  • depth — quick or full (default full).
  • sync_to_gooseworks — optional, default false.
  • include_existing_ads — optional, default true in full mode.
  • generate_assets — optional paid extension, default false.

Brand Core output

Create:

brand-core/
  summary.md
  products.md
  audience.md
  competitors.md
  positioning-and-offers.md
  messaging.md
  visual-identity.md
  sources.md
  brand-core.json

Use local paths that work outside GooseWorks. brand-core.json is a structured echo for other agent skills; the Markdown remains the human-readable source of truth.

Workflow

1. Resolve the entity

Open the provided website and confirm the company name, canonical domain, market, and focus product. If the site is inaccessible or the identity remains ambiguous, ask for the minimum clarification instead of researching the wrong entity.

2. Research the first-party source

Review the homepage, product/collection pages, about page, pricing or offer pages, FAQ, policies, store navigation, social links, and press/brand resources. Capture:

  • what the company sells and how the catalog is organized;
  • prices, offers, bundles, guarantees, subscriptions, and availability;
  • product claims, ingredients/materials, use cases, and differentiators;
  • stated audiences and customer outcomes;
  • brand voice, visual system, proof, and trust markers.

Do not turn marketing claims into facts. Label them as brand-stated claims until corroborated.

3. Research audience evidence

Use reviews, forums, search, social posts, and comments to identify pains, desired outcomes, triggers, objections, alternatives, product language, and use contexts. Preserve short representative language with source links. Use comment-mining for relevant public social threads.

4. Map competitors

Identify direct competitors, substitutes, and reference brands. For each, record positioning, key offer, price band when visible, proof style, and how the focus brand plausibly wins or loses. Separate a verified competitor from a likely competitor inferred from category overlap.

5. Inspect current creative when useful

In full mode, use competitor-ad-intelligence with the brand as advertiser to inspect current Meta, Google, or LinkedIn ads through ScrapeCreators. Extract recurring hooks, offers, proof, product presentation, formats, CTAs, and landing destinations. Do not infer spend or conversion performance from ad-library presence.

6. Synthesize the Brand Core

Write:

  • summary.md: company, category, markets, business model, brand promise, voice in three words, and important unknowns.
  • products.md: product/collection catalog with source URL, price/offer, claims, use cases, and priority.
  • audience.md: audience segments, jobs-to-be-done, triggers, pains, objections, alternatives, and exact sourced language.
  • competitors.md: direct competitors, substitutes, reference brands, positioning comparison, and evidence.
  • positioning-and-offers.md: value proposition, differentiators, offers, proof, guarantees, and gaps.
  • messaging.md: repeated claims, hooks, objections, proof points, CTAs, useful angles, and what the brand should not say.
  • visual-identity.md: logo use, colors, typography when identifiable, photography, layout, product presentation, and off-brand patterns.
  • sources.md: URL, access date, source type, and which claims it supports.

7. Confirm uncertainty

Show a concise confirmation summary: company, priority products/services, audience, likely competitors, offers, and messaging angles. Mark low-confidence findings and ask only about material gaps.

8. Optional GooseWorks sync

Only when requested and the GooseWorks MCP tools are available:

  1. Reuse an existing brand when the domain matches; otherwise create one.
  2. Import the ecommerce catalog through the existing product import tools when relevant.
  3. Update the Brand Kit/Core using only confirmed findings.
  4. Never overwrite stronger first-party brand data without showing the change.

The local Brand Core remains usable even if sync fails.

9. Optional paid assets

Asset generation is never required to finish brand research. If the user explicitly asks:

  • use product-photoshoot for product photography;
  • use goose-graphics for branded graphics;
  • quote credits and confirm before any paid generation.

brand-core.json

{
  "brand": {"name":"","website":"","category":"","markets":[]},
  "products": [{"name":"","url":"","price":"","claims":[],"offers":[]}],
  "audiences": [{"segment":"","jobs":[],"pains":[],"objections":[],"language":[]}],
  "competitors": [{"name":"","url":"","relationship":"direct|substitute|reference","evidence":""}],
  "positioning": {"promise":"","differentiators":[],"proof":[],"offers":[]},
  "messaging": {"hooks":[],"angles":[],"claims":[],"ctas":[],"never_say":[]},
  "visual_identity": {"colors":[],"typography":[],"photography":[],"off_limits":[]},
  "sources": [{"url":"","accessed_at":"","supports":[]}],
  "unknowns": []
}

Omit unknown values rather than inventing them.

Quality checks

  • Every material claim is attributable to a source or clearly labeled as an inference.
  • Products and offers match the live site and include canonical URLs.
  • Audience conclusions include customer evidence, not only brand copy.
  • Competitors are classified as verified or inferred.
  • Messaging angles trace back to repeated evidence.
  • No paid generation ran without explicit confirmation.
  • The local output is complete even when GooseWorks is not connected.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Research supported advertising promises from a specific buyer's context, current product facts, customer language and observed ads. Turn them into static, video or copy ideas; match video ideas to actual recipes and save a product-scoped angle bank for write-video-ad-script. Product-led discovery can use verified facts without reviews. Reference persistence and reach are observations, not proof of performance.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12652026年10月24日 更新

Analyze ad campaign performance data (Google, Meta, LinkedIn) to identify what's working, what's wasting budget, and specific cut/scale/test recommendations. Runs statistical analysis, funnel diagnostics, and multi-channel budget reallocation with specific dollar-amount shift recommendations and scenario modeling.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12652026年10月24日 更新

For paid lead-gen and participant-recruitment ads, replaces vanity CPA with true CAC per qualified lead by joining ad-platform data with downstream funnel events, surfaces tracking gaps, and classifies every creative into Scale / Keep / Investigate / Cut.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12652026年10月24日 更新

The intake stage of a Meta ad harness. Researches the brand first, states what it assumes, and asks only what it cannot infer and what would change money, claims or legal exposure if guessed wrong — at most four questions a turn, in plain business language. Writes the brand's stable facts (ads/brand.md), the campaign brief, and a log of what was asked vs assumed. Use it when someone wants to run Meta ads and the brand's ad facts are not yet recorded.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12652026年10月24日 更新

Checks paid ads against the ad platform's rules (Meta, TikTok, Google, LinkedIn and others) and the brand's category rules: the copy, on-image or on-screen text, pictures and people. Rewrites what can be fixed honestly, adds the disclosures that are needed, and flags anything that needs a human or legal review, with one pass, fixed or flag line per ad and platform. Use alone when you already have the ad text or images and know where they will run; otherwise run the playbook for the job (e.g. make-static-ads, make-content, email-lifecycle).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12652026年10月24日 更新

Analyze the message match between your ads and landing pages. Checks if the promise in the ad copy carries through to the landing page headline, body, and CTA. Flags disconnects that kill conversion rates. Works with Google, Meta, and LinkedIn ads.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12652026年10月24日 更新

查看 gooseworks-ai 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题