跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

product-demand-research

Test product-demand hypotheses using public customer language, search and social signals, competitor offers, reviews, comments, creator content, and social-commerce evidence before committing to a product, launch, offer, or campaign.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md2.5 KB
  • skill.meta.json398 B

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Product Demand Research

Assess whether a product problem, promise, audience, or concept has meaningful evidence behind it.

Inputs

  • Product idea or current product, target market, geography, price/offer assumptions, competitors, and the decision at stake.
  • Hypotheses to test: problem frequency, urgency, current alternatives, willingness signals, objections, or message fit.

Workflow

  1. Write the hypotheses and what evidence would support or weaken each one.
  2. Collect customer language from reviews, forums, search results, social posts, video transcripts, and comments. Use scrapecreators-api, comment-mining, and transcript-intelligence where appropriate.
  3. When the category is sold through social commerce, add a social-commerce evidence pass: TikTok Shop search and category results, product details, reviews, creator showcases, and relevant Amazon Shop pages. Record prices, offers, ratings, review themes, creator-product adjacency, and visible assortment changes.
  4. Map alternatives: direct competitors, substitutes, workarounds, and doing nothing. Record offers, pricing, proof, repeated complaints, and audience response.
  5. Separate attention signals from buying signals. Views and likes show interest; questions about price, availability, comparison, results, repeat use, and credible purchase or review evidence are closer to demand. Shop presence and creator showcases are not proof of sales.
  6. Score each hypothesis by evidence strength, consistency across sources, recency, source diversity, and distance from an observable purchase decision.
  7. Recommend the cheapest next validation: interview, landing-page test, waitlist, offer test, creator test, merchandising test, or ad-message test.

Output

  • Decision summary: proceed, refine, test further, or weak evidence.
  • Hypothesis evidence table with supporting and contradicting sources.
  • Customer language, use cases, triggers, alternatives, objections, willingness signals, and social-commerce evidence when relevant.
  • Market/competitor observations without unsupported market-size claims.
  • Recommended validation plan and success thresholds.

This is directional research, not proof of product-market fit or a substitute for first-party sales data.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Research supported advertising promises from a specific buyer's context, current product facts, customer language and observed ads. Turn them into static, video or copy ideas; match video ideas to actual recipes and save a product-scoped angle bank for write-video-ad-script. Product-led discovery can use verified facts without reviews. Reference persistence and reach are observations, not proof of performance.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12652026年10月24日 更新

Analyze ad campaign performance data (Google, Meta, LinkedIn) to identify what's working, what's wasting budget, and specific cut/scale/test recommendations. Runs statistical analysis, funnel diagnostics, and multi-channel budget reallocation with specific dollar-amount shift recommendations and scenario modeling.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12652026年10月24日 更新

For paid lead-gen and participant-recruitment ads, replaces vanity CPA with true CAC per qualified lead by joining ad-platform data with downstream funnel events, surfaces tracking gaps, and classifies every creative into Scale / Keep / Investigate / Cut.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12652026年10月24日 更新

The intake stage of a Meta ad harness. Researches the brand first, states what it assumes, and asks only what it cannot infer and what would change money, claims or legal exposure if guessed wrong — at most four questions a turn, in plain business language. Writes the brand's stable facts (ads/brand.md), the campaign brief, and a log of what was asked vs assumed. Use it when someone wants to run Meta ads and the brand's ad facts are not yet recorded.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12652026年10月24日 更新

Checks paid ads against the ad platform's rules (Meta, TikTok, Google, LinkedIn and others) and the brand's category rules: the copy, on-image or on-screen text, pictures and people. Rewrites what can be fixed honestly, adds the disclosures that are needed, and flags anything that needs a human or legal review, with one pass, fixed or flag line per ad and platform. Use alone when you already have the ad text or images and know where they will run; otherwise run the playbook for the job (e.g. make-static-ads, make-content, email-lifecycle).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12652026年10月24日 更新

Analyze the message match between your ads and landing pages. Checks if the promise in the ad copy carries through to the landing page headline, body, and CTA. Flags disconnects that kill conversion rates. Works with Google, Meta, and LinkedIn ads.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12652026年10月24日 更新

查看 gooseworks-ai 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题