跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

voice-of-customer-synthesizer

Aggregate customer feedback from multiple sources — support tickets, NPS comments, Slack messages, G2 reviews, call transcripts, survey responses — into a unified VoC report with theme clustering, sentiment analysis, trend detection, and actionable recommendations for product, marketing, and CS teams. Chains review-site-scraper for public review data.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md9.6 KB
  • skill.meta.json390 B

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Voice of Customer Synthesizer

Turn scattered customer feedback into a single source of truth. Aggregates signals from every source you have, clusters them into themes, and produces a report that product, marketing, and CS teams can actually act on.

Built for: Startups where customer feedback lives in 6 different places and nobody has time to synthesize it. The founder says "what are customers saying?" and nobody has a clear answer. This skill produces that answer.

When to Use

  • "What are our customers saying?"
  • "Synthesize customer feedback from last quarter"
  • "Build a VoC report for the product team"
  • "What themes are coming up in customer feedback?"
  • "Aggregate feedback from all our channels"

Phase 0: Intake

Feedback Sources (provide all you have)

  1. Support tickets — Export from support tool (CSV: customer, date, subject, description, tags, resolution)
  2. NPS/CSAT survey responses — Scores + verbatim comments
  3. Slack messages — Customer channel messages, feedback channels
  4. G2/Capterra reviews — Will scrape if product is listed (provide product name or URL)
  5. Call/meeting transcripts — Customer call recordings or notes
  6. Churn exit survey responses — Why did customers leave?
  7. Feature request log — Internal tracker of what customers have asked for
  8. Social mentions — Twitter/LinkedIn/Reddit threads mentioning your product
  9. Email threads — Notable customer emails (praise or complaints)
  10. In-app feedback — Any in-product feedback submissions

Configuration

  1. Time period — What window to analyze? (Last 30 days, quarter, 6 months)
  2. Product name — For review scraping and context
  3. Report audience — Who's reading this? (Product team, exec team, CS team, all)
  4. Focus areas — Any specific themes to pay attention to? (e.g., "onboarding experience", "pricing feedback", "mobile app")

Phase 1: Data Collection

1A: Internal Data Processing

From the provided inputs, normalize all feedback into a standard format:

SOURCE | DATE | CUSTOMER | SEGMENT | FEEDBACK_TEXT | SENTIMENT | CATEGORY

Sentiment classification per item:

  • Positive — Praise, satisfaction, delight
  • Neutral — Feature request, question, observation
  • Negative — Complaint, frustration, disappointment
  • Critical — Churn threat, escalation, anger

1B: External Review Scraping (if applicable)

If product is on review platforms:

Chain: review-site-scraper for G2, Capterra, Trustpilot
Filter: reviews from the target time period

Extract: rating, review text, reviewer role/company size, date, pros, cons.

1C: Social Listening (if applicable)

Search: "[product name]" feedback OR review OR "switched to" OR "stopped using"
Search: "[product name]" site:reddit.com OR site:twitter.com

Phase 2: Theme Clustering

Group all feedback items into themes using a bottom-up approach:

Clustering Method

  1. Read all feedback items
  2. Identify recurring topics (mentioned by 3+ customers or in 3+ sources)
  3. Group into theme clusters
  4. Rank by frequency AND severity

Theme Template

THEME: [Name — e.g., "Onboarding Complexity"]
FREQUENCY: [N mentions across M sources]
SENTIMENT: [Predominantly positive/neutral/negative]
TREND: [↑ Growing / → Stable / ↓ Declining vs prior period]

REPRESENTATIVE QUOTES:
- "[Exact quote]" — [Source, Customer segment, Date]
- "[Exact quote]" — [Source, Customer segment, Date]
- "[Exact quote]" — [Source, Customer segment, Date]

CUSTOMER SEGMENTS AFFECTED:
- [Segment 1: e.g., "New customers in first 30 days"]
- [Segment 2: e.g., "Enterprise accounts"]

ROOT CAUSE HYPOTHESIS:
[1-2 sentences: Why is this coming up? What's the underlying issue?]

IMPACT:
- On retention: [High/Medium/Low]
- On expansion: [High/Medium/Low]
- On acquisition: [High/Medium/Low]

Phase 3: Analysis

3A: Sentiment Overview

Overall Sentiment Distribution:
  Positive:  [N] items ([X%])  ████████░░
  Neutral:   [N] items ([X%])  ████░░░░░░
  Negative:  [N] items ([X%])  ██░░░░░░░░
  Critical:  [N] items ([X%])  █░░░░░░░░░

3B: Source Comparison

SourceVolumeAvg SentimentTop Theme
Support tickets[N][Pos/Neg score][Theme]
NPS comments[N][Score][Theme]
G2 reviews[N][Score][Theme]
Slack[N][Score][Theme]
Calls[N][Score][Theme]

Insight: Different sources often reveal different stories. Support tickets skew negative (problems). Reviews skew bipolar (love/hate). Calls reveal nuance. Note where themes appear across sources for highest confidence.

3C: Segment Analysis

Customer SegmentDominant SentimentTop RequestKey Pain
[New customers][Sentiment][Request][Pain]
[Power users][Sentiment][Request][Pain]
[Enterprise][Sentiment][Request][Pain]
[Churned][Sentiment][Request][Pain]

3D: Trend Detection

Compare against prior period (if available):

ThemePrior PeriodThis PeriodTrendAlert
[Theme 1][N mentions][N mentions][↑X%][New/Growing/Stable/Declining]
[Theme 2]............

New themes this period: [Themes that weren't present before] Resolved themes: [Themes that decreased significantly — things you fixed]

Phase 4: Recommendations

For Product Team

PriorityThemeRecommendationEvidence Strength
P0[Theme][Specific action][N mentions, M sources, includes churn signals]
P1[Theme][Action][Evidence]
P2[Theme][Action][Evidence]

For CS/Support Team

ActionThemeExpected Impact
[Create help article for X][Theme]Deflect ~[N] tickets/month
[Add onboarding step for Y][Theme]Reduce confusion for new users
[Proactive outreach to segment Z][Theme]Prevent churn in at-risk segment

For Marketing Team

ActionThemeOpportunity
[Use this proof point in messaging][Positive theme]"[Customer quote ready for marketing]"
[Address this objection on website][Negative theme]Counter common concern pre-sale
[Build case study around X][Positive theme][N] customers mentioned this win

Phase 5: Output Format

# Voice of Customer Report — [Period]
Sources analyzed: [list]
Total feedback items: [N]
Date range: [start] — [end]

---

## Executive Summary

[3-5 sentences: What are customers saying? What's the overall sentiment?
What's the single most important thing to act on?]

---

## Sentiment Overview

Positive: [X%] | Neutral: [X%] | Negative: [X%] | Critical: [X%]

Net Sentiment Score: [calculated — % positive minus % negative]
vs Prior Period: [+/- X points]

---

## Top Themes (Ranked by Impact)

### 1. [Theme Name] — [Sentiment] — [N mentions]
**Summary:** [2-3 sentences]
**Key quotes:**
> "[Quote]" — [Source]
> "[Quote]" — [Source]
**Recommended action:** [What to do]
**Owner:** [Product / CS / Marketing]

### 2. [Theme Name] — ...

### 3. [Theme Name] — ...

[Continue for top 5-8 themes]

---

## What Customers Love (Preserve These)

| Strength | Evidence | Marketing Opportunity |
|----------|---------|----------------------|
| [Feature/experience] | "[Quote]" — [N mentions] | [How to use in messaging] |

---

## What Customers Want (Feature Requests)

| Request | Frequency | Segments | Product Priority |
|---------|-----------|----------|-----------------|
| [Feature] | [N mentions] | [Who wants it] | [P0/P1/P2] |

---

## What Causes Pain (Fix These)

| Pain Point | Severity | Churn Risk | Recommended Fix |
|-----------|----------|------------|----------------|
| [Issue] | [High/Med/Low] | [Yes/No] | [Action] |

---

## Trends vs Prior Period

[What's getting better, what's getting worse, what's new]

---

## Team-Specific Action Items

### Product Team
1. [Action] — [Evidence]

### CS Team
1. [Action] — [Evidence]

### Marketing Team
1. [Action] — [Evidence]

---

## Appendix: All Themes Detail

[Full theme cards with all quotes and analysis]

Save to voc-report-[YYYY-MM-DD].md in the current working directory.

Scheduling

Run monthly or quarterly:

0 8 1 */3 * python3 run_skill.py voice-of-customer-synthesizer --client <client-name>

Cost

ComponentCost
Review scraping (via review-site-scraper)~$0.50-1.00
Web search (social mentions)Free
All analysis and synthesisFree (LLM reasoning)
TotalFree — $1

Tools Required

  • Optional: review-site-scraper for G2/Capterra/Trustpilot reviews
  • Optional: twitter-mention-tracker for social mentions
  • Optional: reddit-post-finder for community feedback
  • All analysis is pure LLM reasoning on provided data

Trigger Phrases

  • "What are customers saying?"
  • "Build a VoC report"
  • "Synthesize our customer feedback"
  • "Run voice of customer analysis"
  • "Customer feedback summary for [period]"

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Research supported advertising promises from a specific buyer's context, current product facts, customer language and observed ads. Turn them into static, video or copy ideas; match video ideas to actual recipes and save a product-scoped angle bank for write-video-ad-script. Product-led discovery can use verified facts without reviews. Reference persistence and reach are observations, not proof of performance.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12652026年10月24日 更新

Analyze ad campaign performance data (Google, Meta, LinkedIn) to identify what's working, what's wasting budget, and specific cut/scale/test recommendations. Runs statistical analysis, funnel diagnostics, and multi-channel budget reallocation with specific dollar-amount shift recommendations and scenario modeling.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12652026年10月24日 更新

For paid lead-gen and participant-recruitment ads, replaces vanity CPA with true CAC per qualified lead by joining ad-platform data with downstream funnel events, surfaces tracking gaps, and classifies every creative into Scale / Keep / Investigate / Cut.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12652026年10月24日 更新

The intake stage of a Meta ad harness. Researches the brand first, states what it assumes, and asks only what it cannot infer and what would change money, claims or legal exposure if guessed wrong — at most four questions a turn, in plain business language. Writes the brand's stable facts (ads/brand.md), the campaign brief, and a log of what was asked vs assumed. Use it when someone wants to run Meta ads and the brand's ad facts are not yet recorded.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12652026年10月24日 更新

Checks paid ads against the ad platform's rules (Meta, TikTok, Google, LinkedIn and others) and the brand's category rules: the copy, on-image or on-screen text, pictures and people. Rewrites what can be fixed honestly, adds the disclosures that are needed, and flags anything that needs a human or legal review, with one pass, fixed or flag line per ad and platform. Use alone when you already have the ad text or images and know where they will run; otherwise run the playbook for the job (e.g. make-static-ads, make-content, email-lifecycle).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12652026年10月24日 更新

Analyze the message match between your ads and landing pages. Checks if the promise in the ad copy carries through to the landing page headline, body, and CTA. Flags disconnects that kill conversion rates. Works with Google, Meta, and LinkedIn ads.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12652026年10月24日 更新

查看 gooseworks-ai 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题