跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

stylecop-analyzers

Use the open-source free `StyleCop.Analyzers` package for naming, layout, documentation, and style rules in .NET projects. Use when a repo wants stricter style conventions than the SDK analyzers alone provide.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(5)

  • SKILL.md4.0 KB
  • manifest.json101 B
  • references/config.md8.7 KB
  • references/rules.md8.6 KB
  • references/stylecop-analyzers.md2.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

StyleCop Analyzers

Trigger On

  • the repo wants StyleCop.Analyzers
  • naming, layout, or documentation style needs stronger enforcement
  • the team needs stylecop.json guidance

Value

  • produce a concrete project delta: code, docs, config, tests, CI, or review artifact
  • reduce ambiguity through explicit planning, verification, and final validation skills
  • leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer

Do Not Use For

  • repos that intentionally rely only on SDK analyzers
  • repos where StyleCop overlaps too heavily with an existing style package and no consolidation is planned

Inputs

  • the nearest AGENTS.md
  • current .editorconfig
  • any existing stylecop.json

Quick Start

  1. Read the nearest AGENTS.md and confirm scope and constraints.
  2. Run this skill's Workflow through the Ralph Loop until outcomes are acceptable.
  3. Return the Required Result Format with concrete artifacts and verification evidence.

Workflow

  1. Add StyleCop.Analyzers only if the repo wants its opinionated style rules.
  2. Keep severity in the root .editorconfig.
  3. Use stylecop.json only for StyleCop-specific behavioral options.
  4. Prefer one checked-in stylecop.json per repo unless a project genuinely needs its own behavior.
  5. Avoid rule duplication with SDK analyzers or other analyzer packs when possible.

Bootstrap When Missing

If StyleCop.Analyzers is not configured yet:

  1. Detect current state:
    • rg -n "StyleCop\\.Analyzers|stylecop\\.json" -g '*.csproj' -g 'stylecop.json' .
  2. Add package to the intended scope:
    • dotnet add PROJECT.csproj package StyleCop.Analyzers
  3. Keep severity in root .editorconfig and use stylecop.json only for StyleCop-specific behavior.
  4. Prevent overlap with existing analyzer packs by defining ownership.
  5. Run dotnet build SOLUTION_OR_PROJECT and return status: configured or status: improved.
  6. If the repo intentionally uses SDK analyzers only, return status: not_applicable.

Deliver

  • explicit StyleCop package setup
  • repo-owned StyleCop rule configuration
  • clear split between root .editorconfig and stylecop.json

Validate

  • StyleCop severity is versioned in repo config
  • stylecop.json is used only where it adds value

Ralph Loop

Use the Ralph Loop for every task, including docs, architecture, testing, and tooling work.

  1. Plan first (mandatory):
    • analyze current state
    • define target outcome, constraints, and risks
    • write a detailed execution plan
    • list final validation skills to run at the end, with order and reason
  2. Execute one planned step and produce a concrete delta.
  3. Review the result and capture findings with actionable next fixes.
  4. Apply fixes in small batches and rerun the relevant checks or review steps.
  5. Update the plan after each iteration.
  6. Repeat until outcomes are acceptable or only explicit exceptions remain.
  7. If a dependency is missing, bootstrap it or return status: not_applicable with explicit reason and fallback path.

Required Result Format

  • status: complete | clean | improved | configured | not_applicable | blocked
  • plan: concise plan and current iteration step
  • actions_taken: concrete changes made
  • validation_skills: final skills run, or skipped with reasons
  • verification: commands, checks, or review evidence summary
  • remaining: top unresolved items or none

For setup-only requests with no execution, return status: configured and exact next commands.

Load References

  • references/stylecop-analyzers.md
  • references/rules.md
  • references/config.md

Example Requests

  • "Add StyleCop.Analyzers to this solution."
  • "Configure StyleCop without losing .editorconfig ownership."

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Use a repo-root `.editorconfig` to configure free .NET analyzer and style rules. Use when a .NET repo needs rule severity, code-style options, section layout, or analyzer ownership made explicit. Nested `.editorconfig` files are allowed when they serve a clear subtree-specific purpose.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

managedcode/Orleans.RateLimiting302026年10月11日 更新

Design or review .NET solution architecture across modular monoliths, clean architecture, vertical slices, microservices, DDD, CQRS, and cloud-native boundaries without over-engineering.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

managedcode/Orleans.RateLimiting302026年10月11日 更新

Use the open-source free `ArchUnitNET` library for architecture rules in .NET tests. Use when a repo needs richer architecture assertions than lightweight fluent rule libraries usually provide.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

managedcode/Orleans.RateLimiting302026年10月11日 更新

Use the free built-in .NET SDK analyzers and analysis levels with gradual Roslyn warning promotion. Use when a .NET repo needs first-party code analysis, `EnableNETAnalyzers`, `AnalysisLevel`, or warning-as-error policy wired into build and CI.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

managedcode/Orleans.RateLimiting302026年10月11日 更新

Use free built-in .NET maintainability analyzers and code metrics configuration to find overly complex methods and coupled code. Use when a repo needs cyclomatic complexity checks, maintainability thresholds, or complexity-driven refactoring gates.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

managedcode/Orleans.RateLimiting302026年10月11日 更新

Calculates CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) score for .NET methods, classes, or files. Use when the user asks to assess test quality, identify risky untested code, compute CRAP scores, or evaluate whether complex methods have sufficient test coverage. Requires code coverage data (Cobertura XML) and cyclomatic complexity analysis. DO NOT USE FOR: writing tests, general test execution unrelated to coverage/CRAP analysis, or general code coverage reporting without CRAP context.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

managedcode/Orleans.RateLimiting302026年10月11日 更新

查看 managedcode 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题