跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

wiki-lint

Use when an Obsidian wiki needs a reproducible health audit for structure, provenance, links, understanding, lifecycle, and promotion readiness.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills星标 141(GitHub 141 + cccskills 0)
集成工具Obsidian

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md4.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Wiki Lint

<skill_contract> <input>Vault root, path configuration, audit scope, exclusions, prior baseline, and explicit repair authorization if any.</input> <output>A reproducible, severity-ranked wiki health report with file-level evidence, debt queues, and bounded repair proposals.</output> <done>All twelve checks record scope and receipts, findings are reproducible, and report-only mode leaves content unchanged.</done> <non_goals>Silent deletion, immutable-source mutation, unapproved repair, semantic rewrite, or health claims without scan evidence.</non_goals>

Audit the wiki as a governed knowledge graph. Report prioritized, reproducible findings; make no content mutation unless separately authorized.

Usage Template

Provide: vault root, optional path config, audit scope, prior report, and whether repairs are authorized. Default to report-only.

Workflow

<intake>

Resolve configured source, concept, entity, clipping, daily, system, and log paths. Record scan timestamp, file count, exclusions, and prior baseline. Fail closed if the supplied path is not the intended vault.

</intake>

<unknowns_gate>

If the vault root or path semantics are ambiguous, return NEEDS_INPUT before scanning or writing. Missing optional directories are findings; inaccessible required directories are BLOCKED_PERMISSION.

</unknowns_gate>

<execute>

Run twelve checks and preserve file-level evidence:

  1. required frontmatter and stable identifiers;
  2. broken wikilinks and unresolved embeds;
  3. source references and block locators;
  4. orphan concepts and isolated entities;
  5. duplicate titles or semantic duplicates;
  6. stale notes and unresolved contradictions;
  7. single-source or weak-provenance claims;
  8. concept structure and understanding-gate integrity;
  9. clipping archive and source lifecycle;
  10. permission, immutable-source, and human-approval boundaries;
  11. daily-loop receipts and flywheel write-back;
  12. V8.1 promotion-gate readiness for proposed rules.

Classify P0 integrity loss, P1 broken provenance/navigation, P2 debt, and P3 improvement. Prefer deterministic checks; label semantic judgments separately.

</execute> <evaluate>

Re-scan a sample of findings, deduplicate root causes, and compare counts with the prior baseline. A report is invalid if paths, scan scope, or reproduction details are absent. If repair was authorized, run the relevant check again after each bounded repair.

</evaluate>

<state_contract>

Persist {run_id, status, attempt, budget, evidence, unknowns, last_error, next_action} plus vault fingerprint, scan scope, finding ledger, severity counts, baseline delta, authorized repairs, and receipts. Never overwrite the prior report.

</state_contract>

Failure Protocol

  • NEEDS_INPUT: vault identity or configured path semantics are unclear.
  • BLOCKED_PERMISSION: required files cannot be read or an authorized report cannot be written.
  • VERIFY_FAILED: a finding cannot be reproduced; downgrade or remove it.
  • BUDGET_STOP: scan budget ends; return coverage and the unscanned queue rather than a whole-vault claim.

Output Contract

Return status, result (severity-ranked findings and health summary), evidence (paths, checks, counts, samples), unknowns (coverage gaps), and next_action with owner and cheap verification.

Edge Cases

  • A concept is intentionally unlinked during drafting: classify it as debt with age/context, not a P0 defect.
  • A source note has malformed metadata but is immutable: report the issue and propose an overlay/index repair; do not edit the source.

Success Metrics

  • Every P0/P1 finding is reproducible from a path and check.
  • Coverage, exclusions, and baseline delta are explicit.
  • Repair recommendations preserve provenance and include a cheap check.

Quality Gates

  • Vault identity and scan scope are verified.
  • Deterministic and semantic findings are separated.
  • No immutable source was changed without authorization.
  • Report-only versus repair mode is explicit.

</skill_contract>

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Use when work has genuinely independent streams or distinct builder, evaluator, domain, and integration roles that require bounded multi-agent command scaled from 5 to 100+ agents.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills1412026年9月19日 更新

Use when designing or refactoring a model-native engineering workflow with bounded autonomy, probes, custom evaluation, durable state, and verified write-back.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills1412026年9月19日 更新

Use when property-service operations need an AI plus ontology plus DMAIC design for work orders, dispatch, quotes, evidence, CTQ metrics, and control dashboards.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills1412026年9月19日 更新

Use when a personal or team operating system needs a bounded redesign using Four-C, closed-loop controls, 70/30 allocation, 3B creativity, experiments, and prediction-error learning.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills1412026年9月19日 更新

Use when a goal must be converted into a repeatable behavior, cue, SOP, review cadence, and identity-aligned reinforcement.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills1412026年9月19日 更新

Use when source material must be transformed into a compact, evidence-aware model for learning, decisions, or an Obsidian concept note.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Mark393295827/third-brain-v7-skills1412026年9月19日 更新

查看 Mark393295827 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题