跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

level

Score your Claude Code environment on a fun 0-10 ladder (Tourist → Swarm) calibrated to the quickstart's 4 systems — Context, Skills, Integrations, Orchestration. Two front doors - an interactive quiz (zero setup, shareable) or a silent scan of your repo. Outputs a next-level roadmap plus a branded HTML dashboard or a paste-anywhere ASCII card. The default mastery skill of this quickstart. Triggers - "level", "what's my claude code level", "claude code level quiz", "assess my setup", "how good is my setup", "claude code maturity"

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(8)

  • SKILL.md7.4 KB
  • references/ascii-card.py3.0 KB
  • references/benchmark.md4.1 KB
  • references/build-steps.md2.8 KB
  • references/dashboard-template.html11.7 KB
  • references/levels.md6.9 KB
  • references/quiz.md4.8 KB
  • references/roadmaps.md9.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

level — the 10 levels of Claude Code

Most people using Claude Code have no idea how much of it they're actually using. This skill scores you 0-10 on a ladder calibrated to the 4 systems this quickstart teaches — Context · Skills · Integrations · Orchestration — benchmarked against a fully-built setup + the latest Anthropic features, then hands you a focused roadmap and a shareable card.

It's the quickstart's mastery skill: the 8 research skills build your marketing OS; /level tells you how far along the Claude Code curve you are and what to build next. Level 0 is "just installed it." Level 10 is genuinely rare — the documented ceiling in references/benchmark.md.

Pick a front door → Score it → Show the roadmap → Render output → Build first step
       ↓                ↓             ↓               ↓               ↓
   quiz or scan    0-10 + 4 pillars  next level only  html / ascii    optional

Re-run it whenever you want — the score updates as you level up.


Modes and flags

FlagEffect
--mode beginner (default)"Knowledgeable friend" voice — explain why each thing matters, define jargon. Default front door = quiz.
--mode internalTerser, for auditing your own / your team's setup. Default front door = scan.
--brand-kit <path>Brand the HTML dashboard from a brand kit (a DESIGN.md with token frontmatter). Default = your context/brand/brand-kit.md once populated, else plain dark. --brand-kit none forces plain dark.
--format html (default) | ascii | bothOutput shape. html = branded dashboard. ascii = paste-anywhere card (Slack / LinkedIn / a code block). both = each.
--quiz / --assessForce the quiz, or the silent scan (then stop after the assessment).
--buildSkip assessment; jump to building the next step.

No flag → --mode beginner, and offer both front doors ("Want the quick quiz, or should I scan your repo?").


Phase 1 — pick a front door, then score

Both doors converge on the same result: a level (0-10) + a 0-4 sub-score per pillar. references/levels.md is the source of truth — the ladder, the 4-pillar mapping, the scan checklist, and the scoring rule.

Quiz (default in beginner mode)

Read references/quiz.md. Ask the ~8 questions in one AskUserQuestion call (clean clickable options — fun and fast). Map each answer to its pillar + level band, then reconcile to a level + 4 pillar sub-scores per the rule in quiz.md. Needs nothing on disk, so it works before you've built anything — and the result is screenshot-shareable.

Scan (default in internal mode)

Silently inspect the repo using the scan checklist in levels.md — CLAUDE.md, .claude/skills, .mcp.json + plugins, memory / rules, hooks + agents, headless / browser signals, worktrees, scheduled tasks. Then ask the 3 context questions (what you use Claude for / biggest friction / one thing you'd automate). Determine the level. Quantity ≠ level — 50 trivial skills is still Level 3; integration + complexity move the rungs.

Present the assessment

Anchor the ceiling with references/benchmark.md. Present, in the mode's voice: the level + its fun name + vibe; the dual lens (which pillars are strong, which is the gap); a bottom-to-top walk of the rungs cleared, then the first rung that stops you and why it matters (plain language). Most marketers land 1-4; 5 is strong; 7+ is rare. If --assess, stop here.


Phase 2 — the roadmap (next level only)

Show ONLY the next-level transition — focus is everything. Read the matching section in references/roadmaps.md for the assessed level and present its 3-4 steps with time estimates.


Generate the output

Always produce output after Phase 1 (+ Phase 2 unless --assess). Pick the shape from --format (default html). For sharing, offer the ASCII card.

HTML dashboard (--format html, default — or both)

  1. Read references/dashboard-template.html.
  2. Resolve the brand: --brand-kit <path> if given; else your context/brand/brand-kit.md (once populated); else --brand-kit none / the template's dark defaults.
  3. Map brand-kit tokens → dashboard tokens per the template's comment: colors.accent→{{ACCENT}} (primary), colors.tertiary/success→{{DONE}}, colors.background/surface→{{BG}}/{{SURFACE}}, colors.on-background*→text tokens, typography.*.fontFamily→{{FONT}} (+ its web <link> as {{FONT_LINK}}), name/domain→{{BRAND_NAME}}/{{BRAND_URL}}. Use the kit's exact hex — never approximate.
  4. Replace every {{TOKEN}} with real assessment data — per-pillar bars + the shareable result card.
  5. Write to ~/Desktop/claude-code-level.html, open it (open macOS / xdg-open Linux / start Windows), tell the user the path + the brand applied.

ASCII card (--format ascii — or both)

A fixed-width, paste-anywhere card. Build a JSON payload and pipe it to the generator (it asserts every line is identical width, so the box never misaligns):

echo '{"level":N,"name":"<level name>","vibe":"<vibe>",
"pillars":{"Context":c,"Skills":s,"Integrations":i,"Orchestration":o},
"takeaway":["short line 1 (≤48 chars)","line 2"],
"brand_name":"<your brand>","brand_url":"<your domain>"}' \
  | python3 references/ascii-card.py

It prints the card and saves ~/Desktop/claude-code-level.txt. Also paste the card inline in a fenced code block so the user can copy it from chat. brand_name/brand_url come from your brand kit's name + domain.


Phase 3 — build it now (optional)

Ask: "Want me to build the first step of your roadmap right now?" If yes, execute the matching step in references/build-steps.md. Adapt to the person — don't paste templates verbatim. If they score 0-2, point them at the quickstart's 15-minute tour and the 8 research skills to build context fast.


Self-roast (run before delivering)

  • Is the level honest, or inflated? Quantity ≠ maturity — did I check integration + complexity?
  • Did I anchor Level 10 to benchmark.md?
  • Beginner mode: did I explain why each gap matters and define jargon?
  • Did I show only the NEXT level's roadmap, not all 10?
  • Did the output actually render (dashboard opened, or ASCII card pasted inline)?

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Researches one B2B SaaS competitor across 13 dimensions (company, product, ICP, pricing, reviews, content, launches, search and AI visibility, tech stack, hiring, go-to-market, social, paid ads) and writes a sourced dossier with an executive summary, a threat level, strengths and weaknesses, and a data gaps section. Run it once per competitor, then compare. Triggers: "competitor analysis", "competitor research on", "what is [competitor] doing", "compare us to", "competitive landscape", "battlecard prep". Run after /company-context and /icp-research. Not for researching your own company (use /company-context).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

matteotitta/repo-structure-in-house682026年10月21日 更新

Builds an ideal customer profile from evidence: case studies, testimonials, customer logos, solutions pages, reviews and any sales notes you have. Produces market sizing layers, firmographic segments, a champion and an economic buyer persona, a negative ICP, intent signals, customer proof points and a voice-of-customer section in the buyers' own words, every claim sourced. Triggers: "ICP research", "ideal customer profile", "who are our customers", "customer segments", "buyer personas", "who should we target". Run after /company-context. Not for competitor analysis (use /competitor-research) or call transcript patterns (use /win-loss).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

matteotitta/repo-structure-in-house682026年10月21日 更新

messaging

免费

Builds a product messaging library from your positioning, your website and customer evidence: a description, the status quo and alternatives, pain points with their knock-on consequences, capabilities, functional, emotional and social benefits, branded features, the cost of doing nothing, common objections with responses, and core messaging blocks (tagline, elevator pitch, value props, proof, per-audience lines). Every claim sourced. Triggers: "product messaging", "messaging library", "messaging framework", "value props", "capabilities and benefits", "what are our differentiators in words". Run after /positioning. Not for choosing the position itself (use /positioning).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

matteotitta/repo-structure-in-house682026年10月21日 更新

Develops B2B SaaS positioning from your ICP, competitor and win-loss evidence. Maps what buyers compare you to, chooses between leading with a category or a problem, picks a primary and secondary anchor and up to three defensible differentiators, lays out 2 to 4 worked positioning options with a comparison canvas so you can decide, then locks the chosen one and tests it (clarity ladder, guarantee test). Triggers: "positioning", "how do we position", "what category are we in", "how do we differentiate from", "our homepage is confusing", "positioning options". Run before /messaging. Not for taglines or a messaging library (use /messaging).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

matteotitta/repo-structure-in-house682026年10月21日 更新

Extracts a company's tone of voice from its own content and turns it into rules a writer or an AI can follow. Phase 1 analyses 15 to 20 pages for sentence, paragraph, word and structure patterns with frequency counts; after the user reviews it, Phase 2 writes the guidelines: tone attributes with before and after examples, a We are / We are not table, tone by context, vocabulary to use and avoid, and open questions. Triggers: "tone of voice", "brand voice", "voice guidelines", "writing style guide", "extract voice from our website", "TOV". Not for visual identity (use /brand-kit) or messaging (use /messaging).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

matteotitta/repo-structure-in-house682026年10月21日 更新

查看 matteotitta 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题