跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

tov-guidelines

Extracts a company's tone of voice from its own content and turns it into rules a writer or an AI can follow. Phase 1 analyses 15 to 20 pages for sentence, paragraph, word and structure patterns with frequency counts; after the user reviews it, Phase 2 writes the guidelines: tone attributes with before and after examples, a We are / We are not table, tone by context, vocabulary to use and avoid, and open questions. Triggers: "tone of voice", "brand voice", "voice guidelines", "writing style guide", "extract voice from our website", "TOV". Not for visual identity (use /brand-kit) or messaging (use /messaging).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md5.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

TOV guidelines

Find out how a company actually writes, then write that down as rules specific enough that a new writer, or an AI, sounds like them on the first draft. Two phases with a review in between: first the evidence, then the guidelines.

When to use it

  • Building the context folder, before any copy or content work.
  • Starting a content program, or onboarding writers or AI tools.
  • When content has drifted, or the existing guide is more than six months old.

Don't use it for colours and fonts (/brand-kit), for what to say (/messaging), or when the user only wants a one-line description of the voice.

Inputs

Required: the company website URL. It needs a homepage and at least 5 to 10 pages of real content. If it's thin, say so and flag the sample size in the output.

Optional: founder notes or transcripts, an existing style guide to update, context/icp/ for the reader, context/expert-pov/ for the founder's own voice.

Paths. Write context/brand/MMYY-tov-analysis.md (Phase 1) and context/brand/MMYY-tov-guidelines.md (Phase 2). Agency or consultant? Swap context/ for clients/<client>/context/ throughout.

Tools. Page fetching for the site. Web search with a site filter helps collect founder posts. Exa or Firecrawl are fine if you have them.

Phase 1: analysis

  1. Pick the pages. Homepage, about or values, 3 to 5 blog posts, 2 to 3 case studies, pricing, FAQ, a landing page. Aim for 15 to 20.

  2. Sentence patterns: average length, first or third person, questions, imperatives.

  3. Paragraph patterns: length, how they open, where evidence sits.

  4. Word patterns: the company's own terms, the customer's terms, words they avoid, how often they use modifiers.

  5. Structure patterns: sentence or title case headers, CTA wording and placement, how they stack proof.

  6. Score frequency.

    • High: 80% of pages or more.
    • Medium: 40 to 79%.
    • Low: under 40%.
    • Conflict: pages contradict each other.

    Show the count ("5 of 6 pages").

  7. Map voice by content type. Person, formality and CTA style for homepage, blog, case study and pricing.

  8. Collect real examples for each pattern. Use real sentences only, never invented ones.

  9. Flag inconsistencies and gaps, with the questions you'd ask the founder.

  10. Review gate. The user confirms the patterns, corrects anything wrong and answers the gap questions. Don't start Phase 2 without this.

Phase 2: guidelines

  1. Apply the feedback and resolve each inconsistency.
  2. Write the core guide:
    • who reads it
    • 3 to 5 tone attributes, each with a before and after rewrite
    • vocabulary to use and avoid
    • structure templates for the main content types
  3. We are / We are not table. 5 to 8 rows, each backed by Phase 1 evidence.
  4. Tone by context. How the voice shifts for these contexts:
    • cold outreach
    • nurture email
    • objection handling
    • sales follow-up
    • support reply
    • case study
    • social post
  5. Tone by reader emotion. How to write to someone frustrated, sceptical, excited or rushed.
  6. AI writing tells to avoid. At least five patterns that would make this brand sound machine-written, shown with the brand's own fix. Examples: generic praise openers, three short parallel sentences, "it's not X, it's Y" contrasts, filler transitions, closing on "what do you think?".
  7. Optional sections, only when they apply:
    • hard questions answered: security, pricing, a big competitor. Mark these draft until the founder approves.
    • product microcopy, for companies with a product UI.
    • AI assistant voice, for companies with a chatbot.
  8. Open questions. At least three, each saying what it unblocks.
  9. Source every rule to a page, or mark it "TBD, needs founder input".

What good looks like

  • At least 15 pages read, with findings in every pattern category.
  • Frequencies are counts, never "usually" or "often".
  • No adjective-only rules. "Friendly" isn't a guideline; "use 'you' in the first sentence of every page" is.
  • Every example is real text from the site.
  • A writer could pick the right tone for a support reply without asking anyone.

Mistakes to avoid

  • Writing the voice you wish they had instead of the one they have. Note the gap; don't paper over it.
  • Skipping the review gate.
  • Copying another company's style guide structure and filling it with adjectives.
  • Rules so vague any brand could use them.

Chain

Part of the free five-skill chain: /icp-research → /competitor-research → tov-guidelines → /positioning → /messaging. The other six context skills (company context, win-loss, founder POV, brand kit, funnel and goals) are in the paid context plugin ($19.99, link in the README).

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Researches one B2B SaaS competitor across 13 dimensions (company, product, ICP, pricing, reviews, content, launches, search and AI visibility, tech stack, hiring, go-to-market, social, paid ads) and writes a sourced dossier with an executive summary, a threat level, strengths and weaknesses, and a data gaps section. Run it once per competitor, then compare. Triggers: "competitor analysis", "competitor research on", "what is [competitor] doing", "compare us to", "competitive landscape", "battlecard prep". Run after /company-context and /icp-research. Not for researching your own company (use /company-context).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

matteotitta/repo-structure-in-house682026年10月21日 更新

Builds an ideal customer profile from evidence: case studies, testimonials, customer logos, solutions pages, reviews and any sales notes you have. Produces market sizing layers, firmographic segments, a champion and an economic buyer persona, a negative ICP, intent signals, customer proof points and a voice-of-customer section in the buyers' own words, every claim sourced. Triggers: "ICP research", "ideal customer profile", "who are our customers", "customer segments", "buyer personas", "who should we target". Run after /company-context. Not for competitor analysis (use /competitor-research) or call transcript patterns (use /win-loss).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

matteotitta/repo-structure-in-house682026年10月21日 更新

level

免费

Score your Claude Code environment on a fun 0-10 ladder (Tourist → Swarm) calibrated to the quickstart's 4 systems — Context, Skills, Integrations, Orchestration. Two front doors - an interactive quiz (zero setup, shareable) or a silent scan of your repo. Outputs a next-level roadmap plus a branded HTML dashboard or a paste-anywhere ASCII card. The default mastery skill of this quickstart. Triggers - "level", "what's my claude code level", "claude code level quiz", "assess my setup", "how good is my setup", "claude code maturity"

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

matteotitta/repo-structure-in-house682026年10月21日 更新

messaging

免费

Builds a product messaging library from your positioning, your website and customer evidence: a description, the status quo and alternatives, pain points with their knock-on consequences, capabilities, functional, emotional and social benefits, branded features, the cost of doing nothing, common objections with responses, and core messaging blocks (tagline, elevator pitch, value props, proof, per-audience lines). Every claim sourced. Triggers: "product messaging", "messaging library", "messaging framework", "value props", "capabilities and benefits", "what are our differentiators in words". Run after /positioning. Not for choosing the position itself (use /positioning).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

matteotitta/repo-structure-in-house682026年10月21日 更新

Develops B2B SaaS positioning from your ICP, competitor and win-loss evidence. Maps what buyers compare you to, chooses between leading with a category or a problem, picks a primary and secondary anchor and up to three defensible differentiators, lays out 2 to 4 worked positioning options with a comparison canvas so you can decide, then locks the chosen one and tests it (clarity ladder, guarantee test). Triggers: "positioning", "how do we position", "what category are we in", "how do we differentiate from", "our homepage is confusing", "positioning options". Run before /messaging. Not for taglines or a messaging library (use /messaging).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

matteotitta/repo-structure-in-house682026年10月21日 更新

查看 matteotitta 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题