跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

just-stop

Stops "just one more" small tweaks that add scope without changing the outcome. Use when named (just-stop), or when about to implement extra polish, cleanup, or drive-by fixes beyond the stated goal.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md2.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

just-stop

True craft is knowing when to stop. "One more small change" is usually how scope dies by a thousand cuts.

When to apply

  • User names this skill (just-stop)
  • You are about to add "a few small tweaks," polish, cleanup, or drive-by fixes after the goal is already met
  • A change is justified as "while we're here" or "this will help overall" but is not required for the stated outcome

What matters

Identify the true goal / end state. Then ask:

  1. Does this change move that goal from unmet → met?
  2. Or does it only make an already-met goal nicer?

If (2), stop. Say what you'd tweak and leave it optional.

This is not anti-quality. Necessary fixes still ship. Nice-to-haves wait.

Operating rules

  • Goal first: Restate the required outcome in one line before adding work.
  • Challenge extras: When you or the user propose another change, classify it as required vs optional. Be explicit.
  • Ship at the value cliff: Stop where further work turns into icing — renames for taste, comment churn, speculative refactors, decorative CSS, "improve README a bit," extra error paths nobody asked for.
  • Necessary still means necessary: Bugs that block the goal, broken verification, or missing DoD items are not "just one more." Fix those.
  • Offer, don't sneak: If optional tweaks are genuinely valuable, list them after you're done. Don't implement them by default.

Response shape

When stopping yourself or the user:

Done for the goal: [one line]

Optional (not doing unless you want them):
- [tweak]
- [tweak]

When something is truly required:

Still required:
- [change] — [why the goal fails without it]

Anti-patterns

  • Implementing polish after DoD / acceptance already passes
  • Batching unrelated cleanup into a finished task
  • Treating taste differences as defects
  • Expanding a fix into a rewrite
  • Confusing "helpful" with "necessary"

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

adhd

免费

Formats output for ADHD-friendly action — lead with the next step, number tasks, restate state, cut fluff. Use when named (adhd), when the user mentions ADHD or focus/executive-function constraints, or when they ask for steps they can execute immediately.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

nateslabach/skills62026年9月29日 更新

Devil's-advocate attack on AI workflow designs — threat model, assumption challenges, code critiques, and hypothetical redesigns with no file edits. Use for "attack this design", devil's advocate, or hostile challenge on agents/tools/summarization/tokens. Not for PR peer review (code-review) or self-review that applies fixes (ai-systems-review). Prefer: this skill → decide → ai-systems-review.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

nateslabach/skills62026年9月29日 更新

Hostile self-review of recently written AI workflow code that then applies fixes (agents, tools, chat context, summarization, tokens, attachments). Use after generating AI systems code, or when asked to self-review and harden it. Not for PR peer review (code-review) or no-edit devil's-advocate attacks (adversarial-challenge). Prefer: adversarial-challenge → decide → this skill.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

nateslabach/skills62026年9月29日 更新

Writes in ASD-STE100 simplified technical English — short sentences, plain words, active voice. Use when the user wants terse technical prose, names this skill, or asks for STE100.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

nateslabach/skills62026年9月29日 更新

branding

免费

Builds personal brand assets using Seth Godin's frameworks: signature symbol, slogan, surprise (Purple Cow), salient idea, and signature story. Use when named (branding), or when the user asks for a brand symbol, slogan, tagline, Purple Cow, counterintuitive angle, core idea, brand story, or personal brand positioning.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

nateslabach/skills62026年9月29日 更新

Disables the AI's default hedging, diplomatic softening, and social-nicety layers to deliver cold, unfiltered, consequentialist analysis on any topic. Use when the user wants the AI's actual assessment without padding, regardless of how harsh or uncomfortable the honest answer is.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

nateslabach/skills62026年9月29日 更新

查看 nateslabach 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题