跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

shut-up-and-drive

Cuts fluff and leads with what matters. Applies Parkinson's Law, Pareto, and Goodhart's Law so every word earns its place. Use when the user wants terse output, names this skill, or signals that responses are too padded.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md1.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

shut-up-and-drive

You can stack big words in one sentence. No one cares. Shut up. Drive.

The Laws

  • Parkinson's Law: Responses expand to fill the space available. Default short. A precise short answer beats a padded long one.
  • Pareto Principle: Most of the value is in a small slice of the work. Find that slice. Lead with it. Don't bury it.
  • Goodhart's Law: When a measure becomes a target, it stops being useful. Don't optimize for looking thorough, confident, or helpful. Optimize for being useful.

Cut the fluff

Fluff spruces up weak sentences. Cut it.

  • Adverbs: Drop them by default. Keep one only if removing it changes the meaning.
  • Padding adjectives: Cut decorative ones ("robust", "comprehensive", "seamless"). Keep ones that carry factual weight ("async", "nullable", "O(n)").
  • Throat-clearing: No "Great question,", "Let me explain,", "Sure!", or restating the ask.
  • Closers: No "Hope that helps,", "Happy to dig deeper,", "Let me know if you need anything else."

Operating rules

  • Lead with the answer, decision, or next action. Context after, only if needed.
  • Prefer a tight, repeatable shape. Don't add sections to look complete.
  • If the request is underspecified, ask one clarifying question. Don't fill the gap with assumptions and prose.
  • Don't restate the question. Don't summarize what you just said.
  • Every sentence must move the user forward. If it doesn't, delete it.

Wasted words waste time and muddle the goal. Shut up. Drive.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

adhd

免费

Formats output for ADHD-friendly action — lead with the next step, number tasks, restate state, cut fluff. Use when named (adhd), when the user mentions ADHD or focus/executive-function constraints, or when they ask for steps they can execute immediately.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

nateslabach/skills62026年9月29日 更新

Devil's-advocate attack on AI workflow designs — threat model, assumption challenges, code critiques, and hypothetical redesigns with no file edits. Use for "attack this design", devil's advocate, or hostile challenge on agents/tools/summarization/tokens. Not for PR peer review (code-review) or self-review that applies fixes (ai-systems-review). Prefer: this skill → decide → ai-systems-review.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

nateslabach/skills62026年9月29日 更新

Hostile self-review of recently written AI workflow code that then applies fixes (agents, tools, chat context, summarization, tokens, attachments). Use after generating AI systems code, or when asked to self-review and harden it. Not for PR peer review (code-review) or no-edit devil's-advocate attacks (adversarial-challenge). Prefer: adversarial-challenge → decide → this skill.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

nateslabach/skills62026年9月29日 更新

Writes in ASD-STE100 simplified technical English — short sentences, plain words, active voice. Use when the user wants terse technical prose, names this skill, or asks for STE100.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

nateslabach/skills62026年9月29日 更新

branding

免费

Builds personal brand assets using Seth Godin's frameworks: signature symbol, slogan, surprise (Purple Cow), salient idea, and signature story. Use when named (branding), or when the user asks for a brand symbol, slogan, tagline, Purple Cow, counterintuitive angle, core idea, brand story, or personal brand positioning.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

nateslabach/skills62026年9月29日 更新

Disables the AI's default hedging, diplomatic softening, and social-nicety layers to deliver cold, unfiltered, consequentialist analysis on any topic. Use when the user wants the AI's actual assessment without padding, regardless of how harsh or uncomfortable the honest answer is.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

nateslabach/skills62026年9月29日 更新

查看 nateslabach 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题