跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

agentic-session-debugger

Use when a Claude Code session loops, drifts from scope, claims a fix that CI rejects, hits context, PATH, or permission walls, or fails in a way another retry will not solve and a root cause diagnosis is needed instead.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md3.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Agentic Session Debugger

When to use

Use this skill when a Claude Code or agentic coding session behaves unreliably and the user needs root cause diagnosis rather than another attempt at the same command. It applies at any lifecycle stage, and the lesson it records belongs in the project's standing instructions. It is not for evaluating whether an agent's outputs are portable across tool environments, that is agent-portability-matrix, and it is not for getting an independent second diagnosis on a difficult failure, that is cross-agent-second-opinion.

Inputs

  • User goal.
  • Recent commands or actions.
  • Error messages.
  • Files or tools involved.
  • Current working directory.
  • Permission and environment constraints.
  • What changed just before the failure.

Workflow

  1. Restate the intended outcome.
  2. Identify the failure class, tool, knowledge, communication, permission, environment, or context.
  3. Capture exact evidence from logs, errors, tests, or terminal output.
  4. Check scope drift, repeated loops, hidden state, stale context, and conflicting instructions.
  5. Check environment issues, including PATH, shell, dependency version, working directory, and permissions.
  6. Reduce the problem to the smallest reproducible step.
  7. Propose the smallest correction and a verification command.
  8. Record the lesson if the failure pattern should not recur.

Output

Return:

  • Intended outcome.
  • Failure class.
  • Evidence.
  • Root cause hypothesis.
  • Minimal reproduction.
  • Fix plan.
  • Verification step.
  • Residual risk.
  • What to record at session end: the failure class, the root cause hypothesis, the fix applied, and the reusable rule added to the project's standing instructions.

Verification

  • The diagnosis cites actual evidence, not only model intuition.
  • The smallest reproducible case is identified or the reason it cannot be reproduced is stated.
  • Permission failures are not solved by destructive commands.
  • The fix has a clear pass or fail check.
  • Repeated session errors are converted into a reusable rule.
  • Before closing: the fix has been verified with a concrete pass/fail check, and if the failure pattern involves cross-tool or cross-environment behavior, agent-portability-matrix or cross-agent-second-opinion has been noted as the next step.

Safety

Do not run destructive commands unless the user explicitly requested them and the target path is verified. Do not print secrets from logs. Redact tokens, passwords, private paths, and personal identifiers.

Example prompt

"Claude Code keeps looping on a failing validator and says the file is fixed, but CI still fails. Diagnose the session."

Expected smoke output:

  • Failure class, evidence, minimal reproduction, likely hidden-state or stale-assumption issue.
  • A concrete verification command and a smaller next fix.

Türkçe kullanım notu

Bu beceri, aksayan bir Claude Code oturumunu aynı komutu yeniden denemek yerine kök nedenden teşhis eder. Bozulma sınıfı belirlenir, kanıt toplanır, sorun en küçük tekrarlanabilir adıma indirilir ve en küçük düzeltme doğrulama komutuyla birlikte önerilir. Tekrarlayan hata kalıcı bir kurala dönüştürülür, yıkıcı komutlar teşhisin parçası olamaz.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Use when a complete research workflow — its instructions, skills, data boundaries, and tool connections — must be assessed for portability across AI agents or environments, so each component is explicitly mapped before migration rather than assumed to transfer.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026年9月6日 更新

Use when AI contribution metadata must match the actual workflow, when model alias and dated identifiers need auditing, when verified and fabricated citation counts feed a release decision, or when a venue's AI disclosure statement needs evidence behind it.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026年9月6日 更新

Use when a draft in Turkish, English, or both reads as AI-generated and needs revision that removes machine writing patterns and translation calques while preserving meaning, citations, statistics, and the author's voice.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026年9月6日 更新

Use when a reference list needs APA 7 cleanup, when DOIs must be confirmed real against Crossref or PubMed, when the user asks whether AI-suggested citations actually exist, or when a manuscript needs a citation hygiene pass before submission or defense.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026年9月6日 更新

Use when authorship order, CRediT contribution roles, or AI-assistance attribution must be recorded transparently for a manuscript, when an author dispute needs an evidence trail, or before a contributorship statement is required at submission; this skill maintains the human-attribution ledger of who contributed what and in which role (authorship order, CRediT taxonomy, revision responsibilities), which is distinct from the disclosure-metadata audit owned by ai-disclosure-auditor.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026年9月6日 更新

Use when paired tr.md and en.md files need a parity verdict, when titles, frontmatter, headings, or DOI sets may have drifted between languages, or when a bilingual document is approaching release and its translation coverage needs an audit.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026年9月6日 更新

查看 OnourImpram 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题