跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

ai-disclosure-auditor

Use when AI contribution metadata must match the actual workflow, when model alias and dated identifiers need auditing, when verified and fabricated citation counts feed a release decision, or when a venue's AI disclosure statement needs evidence behind it.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md3.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

AI Disclosure Auditor

When to use

Use this skill before release, after AI-assisted drafting, or during citation cleanup when the user needs disclosure metadata to match the actual workflow. Its citation counts come from apa-doi-verifier results, and its verdict feeds repo-release-integrity-check at release time. It is not for building an open-science release package or recording authorship contributions, those are open-science-release-packager and authorship-contribution-ledger.

Inputs

  • Booklet file or set of booklet files.
  • Actual AI tools used.
  • Human review state.
  • Verified citation count.
  • Fabricated citation count.
  • Disclosure standard expected by the project or publisher.

Workflow

  1. Read the frontmatter before the body.
  2. Confirm ai_assisted reflects actual AI use.
  3. Confirm ai_tools.name, vendor, model_alias, model_dated, and role.
  4. Classify contribution level using the project policy, not tone impression.
  5. Confirm human_review and human_review_date.
  6. Compare verified_citations_count with the reference list and in-text citation set when available.
  7. Confirm fabricated_citations_count is zero for release material.
  8. Check disclosure_standard against the current project policy.
  9. Recommend frontmatter corrections and any body disclosure corrections.

Output

Return:

  • Disclosure verdict.
  • Field-level audit table.
  • Contribution level rationale.
  • Human review evidence needed.
  • Citation count reconciliation.
  • Fabricated citation risk notes.
  • Required release blockers.
  • What to record at session end: the disclosure verdict per file, any fields still pending human confirmation, and a one-line summary for the release log.

Verification

  • Model alias and dated model fields are both present.
  • Human review is not upgraded without evidence.
  • Citation counts are not copied from older aggregate files without checking the current file.
  • Release material with fabricated citations is blocked.
  • Aggregate disclosure and per-file frontmatter are consistent.
  • Before closing: every release blocker is documented and the verified disclosure output is ready to hand to open-science-release-packager.

Safety

Do not expose prompts, logs, private notes, credentials, unpublished clinical data, or reviewer identities unless the user explicitly supplies publication-safe excerpts. Keep the audit at metadata and disclosure level when private context is not needed.

Example prompt

"Audit the AI disclosure fields for all released booklets and tell me which files block v1.1.0."

Expected smoke output:

  • A file-by-file table with pass, partial, or fail.
  • A release-blocker list.
  • A count summary for contribution levels and human review state.

Türkçe kullanım notu

Bu beceri, yapay zekâ katkı beyanının gerçek iş akışıyla örtüşüp örtüşmediğini alan alan denetler. Model kimlikleri, insan incelemesi durumu ve atıf sayıları kanıtla karşılaştırılır, uydurma atıf içeren içerik yayına kapatılır. Atıf sayıları apa-doi-verifier doğrulamasından gelir, sonuç yayın bütünlüğü kontrolüne girdi olur. Açık bilim paketi için open-science-release-packager'a, yazarlık katkı kaydı için authorship-contribution-ledger'a devredilir. Oturum sonunda denetim kararı ve bekleyen alanlar kayda geçirilir.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Use when a complete research workflow — its instructions, skills, data boundaries, and tool connections — must be assessed for portability across AI agents or environments, so each component is explicitly mapped before migration rather than assumed to transfer.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026年9月6日 更新

Use when a Claude Code session loops, drifts from scope, claims a fix that CI rejects, hits context, PATH, or permission walls, or fails in a way another retry will not solve and a root cause diagnosis is needed instead.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026年9月6日 更新

Use when a draft in Turkish, English, or both reads as AI-generated and needs revision that removes machine writing patterns and translation calques while preserving meaning, citations, statistics, and the author's voice.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026年9月6日 更新

Use when a reference list needs APA 7 cleanup, when DOIs must be confirmed real against Crossref or PubMed, when the user asks whether AI-suggested citations actually exist, or when a manuscript needs a citation hygiene pass before submission or defense.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026年9月6日 更新

Use when authorship order, CRediT contribution roles, or AI-assistance attribution must be recorded transparently for a manuscript, when an author dispute needs an evidence trail, or before a contributorship statement is required at submission; this skill maintains the human-attribution ledger of who contributed what and in which role (authorship order, CRediT taxonomy, revision responsibilities), which is distinct from the disclosure-metadata audit owned by ai-disclosure-auditor.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026年9月6日 更新

Use when paired tr.md and en.md files need a parity verdict, when titles, frontmatter, headings, or DOI sets may have drifted between languages, or when a bilingual document is approaching release and its translation coverage needs an audit.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026年9月6日 更新

查看 OnourImpram 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题