跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

prioritization-frameworks

Compare nine methods for setting priorities, including RICE and ICE, which score ideas using factors such as impact and confidence. Use formulas, selection guidance, and linked templates to choose an approach for customer problems, initiatives, or requirements.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Reference guide to 9 prioritization frameworks with formulas, when-to-use guidance, and templates — RICE, ICE, Kano, MoSCoW, Opportunity Score, and more. Use when selecting a prioritization method, comparing frameworks like RICE vs ICE, or learning how different prioritization approaches work.

集成工具Google Sheets
查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Choosing a method for setting priorities
  • Comparing RICE and ICE
  • Ranking customer problems by importance and satisfaction
  • Finding scoring formulas and templates

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md4.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Prioritization Frameworks Reference

A reference guide to help you select and apply the right prioritization framework for your context.

Core Principle

Never allow customers to design solutions. Prioritize problems (opportunities), not features.

Opportunity Score (Dan Olsen, The Lean Product Playbook)

The recommended framework for prioritizing customer problems.

Survey customers on Importance and Satisfaction for each need (normalize to 0–1 scale).

Three related formulas:

  • Current value = Importance × Satisfaction
  • Opportunity Score = Importance × (1 − Satisfaction)
  • Customer value created = Importance × (S2 − S1), where S1 = satisfaction before, S2 = satisfaction after

High Importance + low Satisfaction = highest Opportunity Score = best opportunities. Plot on an Importance vs Satisfaction chart — upper-left quadrant is the sweet spot. Prioritizes customer problems, not solutions.

ICE Framework

Useful for prioritizing initiatives and ideas. Considers not only value but also risk and economic factors.

  • I (Impact) = Opportunity Score × Number of Customers affected
  • C (Confidence) = How confident are we? (1-10). Accounts for risk.
  • E (Ease) = How easy is it to implement? (1-10). Accounts for economic factors.

Score = I × C × E. Higher = prioritize first.

RICE Framework

Splits ICE's Impact into two separate factors. Useful for larger teams that need more granularity.

  • R (Reach) = Number of customers affected
  • I (Impact) = Opportunity Score (value per customer)
  • C (Confidence) = How confident are we? (0-100%)
  • E (Effort) = How much effort to implement? (person-months)

Score = (R × I × C) / E

9 Frameworks Overview

FrameworkBest ForKey Insight
Eisenhower MatrixPersonal tasksUrgent vs Important — for individual PM task management
Impact vs EffortTasks/initiativesSimple 2×2 — quick triage, not rigorous for strategic decisions
Risk vs RewardInitiativesLike Impact vs Effort but accounts for uncertainty
Opportunity ScoreCustomer problemsRecommended. Importance × (1 − Satisfaction). Normalize to 0–1.
Kano ModelUnderstanding expectationsMust-be, Performance, Attractive, Indifferent, Reverse. For understanding, not prioritizing.
Weighted Decision MatrixMulti-factor decisionsAssign weights to criteria, score each option. Useful for stakeholder buy-in.
ICEIdeas/initiativesImpact × Confidence × Ease. Recommended for quick prioritization.
RICEIdeas at scale(Reach × Impact × Confidence) / Effort. Adds Reach to ICE.
MoSCoWRequirementsMust/Should/Could/Won't. Caution: project management origin.

Templates


Further Reading

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Analyze A/B test results to decide whether to launch a change, extend testing, stop, or investigate further. Check sample size, statistical significance, uncertainty ranges, and effects on other important metrics, then summarize the recommendation and next steps.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking whether an A/B test shows a meaningful difference
  • Reviewing sample size and test duration
  • Deciding whether to launch a tested change
phuryn/pm-skills2.7万2026年10月16日 更新

Organize customer feature requests into themes and rank the top three against product goals, customer value, effort, and risk. For each recommendation, explain the underlying need, possible alternatives, uncertain assumptions, and simple ways to test them.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Grouping customer requests into themes
  • Selecting the top three requests for product goals
  • Considering alternatives to requested features
phuryn/pm-skills2.7万2026年10月16日 更新

Compare growth options across existing and new products and markets using the Ansoff Matrix, a four-part planning framework. Assess opportunities, resources, competition, and risks, then develop market launch plans and a phased roadmap for priority options.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Comparing growth options for an existing business
  • Planning expansion into new regions or customer groups
  • Evaluating new products for current customers
phuryn/pm-skills2.7万2026年10月16日 更新

Choose the first customer segment for a product launch by comparing urgent needs, willingness to pay, achievable market share, and referral potential. Get scored recommendations, a priority segment, a 90-day acquisition plan, and expansion options.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Choosing the first customer segment for a new product
  • Focusing limited resources on a launch market
  • Comparing segments using interviews and customer feedback
phuryn/pm-skills2.7万2026年10月16日 更新

Plan low-effort experiments to check assumptions about an existing product before building a feature. Compare prototypes, A/B tests, and other methods, with a clear assumption, procedure, metric, and success threshold for each experiment.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Checking feature assumptions before implementation
  • Planning prototype usability tests
  • Defining metrics and success thresholds for A/B tests
phuryn/pm-skills2.7万2026年10月16日 更新

Turn a new product idea into a testable hypothesis and two or three simple experiments. Define target customers, expected actions, measurement methods, and success thresholds to assess demand through behavior such as sign-ups, pre-orders, or paid commitments.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Testing demand before building a new product
  • Planning landing page or waitlist experiments
  • Checking willingness to pay through pre-orders
phuryn/pm-skills2.7万2026年10月16日 更新

查看 phuryn 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题