Compare feature ideas by expected impact, required effort, uncertainty, and fit with product goals. Get five ranked recommendations, with reasons for each choice, trade-offs, and explanations of which ideas should receive lower priority.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Prioritize a backlog of feature ideas based on impact, effort, risk, and strategic alignment with top 5 recommendations. Use when prioritizing a feature backlog, making scope decisions, or ranking product ideas.
安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Evaluate and rank a backlog of feature ideas to identify the top 5 to pursue.
You are helping prioritize features for $ARGUMENTS.
If the user provides files (spreadsheets, backlogs, opportunity assessments), read and analyze them directly.
For framework selection guidance, see the prioritization-frameworks skill. Key recommendations:
Opportunity Score (Dan Olsen, The Lean Product Playbook) is recommended for evaluating customer problems: Opportunity Score = Importance × (1 − Satisfaction), normalized to 0–1. High Importance + low Satisfaction = best opportunities. Prioritize problems (opportunities), not solutions.
ICE is recommended for quick scoring of initiatives: Impact (Opportunity Score × # Customers) × Confidence × Ease. RICE adds Reach as a separate factor for larger teams.
The user will describe their product objective, desired outcomes, and provide feature ideas. Work through these steps:
Understand priorities: Confirm the product objective and success metrics.
Evaluate each feature against:
Recommend the top 5 features with:
Present as a prioritization table if helpful.
Think step by step. Save as markdown if the output is substantial.
还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问，或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
Analyze A/B test results to decide whether to launch a change, extend testing, stop, or investigate further. Check sample size, statistical significance, uncertainty ranges, and effects on other important metrics, then summarize the recommendation and next steps.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Organize customer feature requests into themes and rank the top three against product goals, customer value, effort, and risk. For each recommendation, explain the underlying need, possible alternatives, uncertain assumptions, and simple ways to test them.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Compare growth options across existing and new products and markets using the Ansoff Matrix, a four-part planning framework. Assess opportunities, resources, competition, and risks, then develop market launch plans and a phased roadmap for priority options.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Choose the first customer segment for a product launch by comparing urgent needs, willingness to pay, achievable market share, and referral potential. Get scored recommendations, a priority segment, a 90-day acquisition plan, and expansion options.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Plan low-effort experiments to check assumptions about an existing product before building a feature. Compare prototypes, A/B tests, and other methods, with a clear assumption, procedure, metric, and success threshold for each experiment.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。
Turn a new product idea into a testable hypothesis and two or three simple experiments. Define target customers, expected actions, measurement methods, and success thresholds to assess demand through behavior such as sign-ups, pre-orders, or paid commitments.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。