免费在 GitHub 公开

email-copy-review

Use this skill when you want an honest review of outreach copy before sending: "roast my cold email", "review this sequence", "why is nobody replying", "score my email". Scores the email on relevance, clarity, proof, ask, length and deliverability risk, quotes the exact lines that hurt, explains why from the reader's point of view, and returns a rewritten version. Works for cold emails, LinkedIn messages and whole sequences.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

prosyo-ai/gtm-skill星标 11(GitHub 11 + cccskills 0)

集成工具LinkedIn

实测评分未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件（2）

SKILL.md3.5 KB
references/review-rubric.md1.9 KB

SKILL.md（原文）

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Use this before a campaign goes out, or when results are poor. It produces a scorecard, exact line-level fixes and a rewrite, judged from the reader's side of the inbox.

Inputs

The email, message or full sequence.
Who it is for and what it should achieve.
Results so far, if any.

The play

1. Read it as the recipient

A busy person on a phone, between meetings, who has never heard of you. Note the moment you would stop reading.

2. Score six dimensions

Score each 1-5 using references/review-rubric.md:

Dimension	Question
Relevance	Is it clearly about my situation?
Clarity	Do I understand what they do and why it matters to me in one read?
Proof	Is there a specific, believable reason to trust the claim?
Ask	Is the next step easy and low-commitment?
Brevity	Is every sentence earning its place?
Deliverability	Does anything look like spam or marketing?

3. Quote and fix

For every issue, quote the exact line, say why it hurts from the reader's side, and give the replacement. Prioritise: fix the top three issues first; polishing a weak angle is wasted effort.

4. Rewrite

Return a rewritten version that keeps the sender's offer and proof. Show the word count before and after.

5. Diagnose results (if provided)

Symptom	Most likely cause
High bounce	List quality, not copy
Low replies, few opt-outs	Weak relevance or targeting
Replies mostly negative	Offer or ask mismatch, or wrong persona
Positive replies but few meetings	Slow or weak reply handling
Spam complaints	Volume, targeting or misleading subject

Output format

Score: <total>/30  |  Verdict: send / fix first / rewrite
Top 3 issues: <quoted line - why - fix>
Other notes: <short>
Rewrite (<words before> → <words after>):
<email>

What good looks like

Feedback quotes the email; it never says "make it more personal" without showing how.
Honest but useful: "this reads like a brochure" is followed by the line that proves it and a better line.
The review separates copy problems from list and deliverability problems.
The common mistake is rewriting the whole thing in the reviewer's voice and losing the sender's facts and proof.

Rules

MUST quote the exact line for every criticism.
MUST keep the sender's facts, offer and proof in the rewrite.
NEVER add claims, numbers or customers the sender did not provide.

Example prompts

"Roast this cold email. Be brutal but useful."
"Review our 4-step sequence; replies dropped to 1%."
"Score these three variants and tell me which to send."

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问，或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

同一仓库的技能

abm-account-plan

免费

Use this skill when you run account-based marketing or sales on a short list of named accounts: "build an ABM plan", "account plan for our top 20", "how do we break into this enterprise account", "1:1 ABM program". Picks the accounts and the ABM tier (1:1, 1:few, 1:many), maps the buying group, writes the account insight and value hypothesis, plans coordinated sales and marketing plays by stage, and sets the metrics (engagement, meetings, pipeline) that show it is working.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。