免费在 GitHub 公开

messaging-matrix

Use this skill when one message does not fit every buyer and you need messaging by persona, industry or stage: "build a messaging matrix", "tailor our pitch for each persona", "different messages for CFO and CTO", "sales messaging framework". Maps each persona to its top pains, the outcome they care about, proof that persuades them, objections and the words to use and avoid, then writes ready-to-use lines for cold email, LinkedIn, calls and landing pages.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

prosyo-ai/gtm-skill星标 11(GitHub 11 + cccskills 0)

集成工具LinkedIn

实测评分未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件（1）

SKILL.md3.8 KB

SKILL.md（原文）

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Use this when the same pitch goes to a CFO, a team lead and an engineer. It produces a matrix that keeps the core value proposition but changes the pain, proof and words for each reader.

Inputs

The core value proposition and pillars.
Personas (economic buyer, champion, user, technical evaluator).
Proof points, tagged by what they prove.

The play

1. Build the grid

Rows are personas; columns are:

Column	What goes in
Measured on	The metric they own
Top pain	The pain in their words
Outcome	The result they want
Pillar to lead with	Which of your pillars fits best
Proof	The proof point that persuades this role
Objection	Their most likely pushback and the answer
Use	Words that resonate
Avoid	Words that make them tune out

2. Pick the lead pillar per persona

A CFO hears cost and risk; a team lead hears time and quality; an engineer hears how it works and what it touches. Same product, different first sentence.

3. Write the lines

Per persona: an email opener, a LinkedIn opener, a 20-second call opener and a landing page headline. Lines reuse the matrix words exactly.

4. Add industry or stage variants only when they change the pain

A variant earns a row when the pain or the proof genuinely differs (healthcare compliance, a seed-stage team without a RevOps person). Otherwise, the persona row is enough.

Example row

Persona	Measured on	Top pain	Outcome	Lead pillar	Proof	Objection → answer	Use	Avoid
CFO	Close time, audit findings, headcount cost	"We hire analysts to do reconciliation"	5-day close without new hires	Automation of reconciliation	Contoso: 9 → 4 days, one analyst redeployed	"Another tool to buy" → replaces 2 tools and manual hours	close, audit trail, headcount	revolutionary, synergy, seamless

Lines for the CFO:

Email: "Most finance teams your size close in 8-10 days, and most of it is reconciliation."
Call: "I work with CFOs who'd rather not hire another analyst to get to a 5-day close."
Landing page: "A 5-day close, without another analyst."

What good looks like

Every persona row has a different first sentence.
Proof is matched to persona.
The matrix fits on one page; reps actually use it.
The common mistake is building a 12-column matrix for 15 micro-segments that nobody opens again.

Rules

MUST keep the core value proposition consistent across rows.
MUST use only approved proof points.
NEVER create rows for segments without distinct pains.

Example prompts

"Build a messaging matrix for CFO, Controller and AP Manager from our value prop."
"Our SDRs use the same pitch for everyone. Create persona lines for email and LinkedIn."
"Add healthcare and fintech variants to our messaging matrix where they truly differ."

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问，或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

同一仓库的技能

abm-account-plan

免费

Use this skill when you run account-based marketing or sales on a short list of named accounts: "build an ABM plan", "account plan for our top 20", "how do we break into this enterprise account", "1:1 ABM program". Picks the accounts and the ABM tier (1:1, 1:few, 1:many), maps the buying group, writes the account insight and value hypothesis, plans coordinated sales and marketing plays by stage, and sets the metrics (engagement, meetings, pipeline) that show it is working.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。