对照HuggingFace router的模型列表与chat-ui配置,研究尚未收录的模型,编写简短英文说明,并同步添加到生产和开发配置。
- 添加路由中新上线的模型
- 用简短说明概括模型特点
- 同步更新生产和开发环境的模型信息
根据反映资产收益联动关系的协方差矩阵和预期收益率,使用共轭梯度法计算投资组合配置,并保存计算方法、迭代次数、误差和耗时,供后续核查。
Mean-variance portfolio optimization via Conjugate Gradient — 40-60× faster than the legacy Neumann path (ADR-126 Phase 3, ADR-123 Wedge 8)
根据协方差矩阵和预期收益率计算投资组合配置;协方差矩阵用于描述各资产收益之间的联动关系。使用共轭梯度法反复求解线性方程组,无法使用原生MCP实现时,切换到本地JavaScript实现。除配置结果外,还保存计算方法、迭代次数、误差和耗时。
适合已准备好输入数据、需要计算资产配置,或希望与原有Neumann方法比较结果的情况。也可对照历史配置,在单项资产的配置变化较大时,提交人工确认。
需要neural-trader、专用适配器和MCP存储工具。neural-trader 2.8.11不返回所需矩阵及预期收益率,因此输入须由用户或历史存储数据提供。共轭梯度法要求矩阵对称正定,输入不满足条件等情况下会切换到原有方法。原文的速度比较是在特定条件下测得的。
本介绍由 AI(OpenAI Codex)根据公开的 SKILL.md 撰写。准确的规格请查看下方原文。
AI 仅根据 SKILL.md 的内容,从 4 个方面进行了评估。星标数和热度不计入评估。
总分按每项 A=25 分、B=15 分、C=5 分相加。 由 AI(OpenAI Codex)于 2026年10月21日 评估。仅供参考,安装前请同时查看原文。
安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。
Solve the mean-variance optimization Σ · x = μ via Conjugate Gradient instead of the legacy Neumann series.
Why CG instead of Neumann (ADR-123 Wedge 8):
npx neural-trader --portfolio optimize)The covariance matrix Σ is symmetric positive-definite by construction (it's a Gram matrix on real returns), so CG is provably optimal — it converges in at most n iterations with no preconditioning, and typically far fewer when eigenvalues cluster.
Disable flag: set RUFLO_NEURAL_TRADER_DISABLE_CG=1 to skip the CG path entirely and fall through to step 4's legacy Neumann route. Useful for A/B validation or when an upstream covariance regression breaks SPD.
Native dispatch flag: set RUFLO_SUBLINEAR_NATIVE=1 to force the adapter to attempt the native mcp__ruflo-sublinear__solve path even when globalThis doesn't expose the tool (e.g. when the harness mounts it via a different transport). On any native-dispatch failure the adapter cleanly falls back to the local JS CG and records method: 'cg-local' in the artifact metadata — so the regression is auditable.
Steps:
Ensure neural-trader is available:
npm ls neural-trader 2>/dev/null || npm install --ignore-scripts neural-trader
Read the current covariance matrix Σ and expected-return vector μ from neural-trader's portfolio API:
# neural-trader 2.8.11 does NOT return Σ or μ: `--portfolio current` runs the equal-weight demo
# (symbols, weights, a risk figure and a note that the returns matrix is not wired).
# Take Σ and μ from the user (a returns matrix they provide), or from AgentDB if a prior run stored them:
mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__memory_search({ query: "covariance matrix current", namespace: "trading-risk", limit: 1 })
The skill expects the response to include covariance: number[][] (n × n) and expectedReturns: number[] (length n).
Solve Σ · x = μ via the SublinearAdapter (preferred path) when RUFLO_NEURAL_TRADER_DISABLE_CG is unset:
import { sublinearAdapter } from '../../src/sublinear-adapter.mjs';
const result = await sublinearAdapter.solveCG(COVARIANCE, EXPECTED_RETURNS, {
tolerance: 1e-6,
maxIterations: 200,
});
// result.solution — optimal weights (number[])
// result.iterations — CG iterations executed
// result.residual — final ||A·x − b||₂
// result.latencyMs — wall-clock latency
// result.method — 'cg-sublinear-native' | 'cg-local' <-- READ THIS
// result.solver — 'sublinear-time-solver@1.7.0' | 'local-js-cg'
// result.degraded — true if input failed SPD checks (fall back to step 4)
The adapter does the dispatch itself: it probes for mcp__ruflo-sublinear__solve on globalThis (and honours RUFLO_SUBLINEAR_NATIVE=1 as a manual override), routes through the native kernel when reachable, and falls back transparently to the embedded ~50-LOC JS CG when not. The math is identical either way — CG, dense form, n × n SPD covariance. The operator reads result.method to know which backend produced the artifact.
The native MCP tool's wire shape (for direct callers who want to bypass the adapter):
mcp__ruflo-sublinear__solve({
matrix: COVARIANCE,
rhs: EXPECTED_RETURNS,
algorithm: "cg",
tolerance: 1e-6,
maxIterations: 200
})
Output:
{ solution: number[], iterations: number, residual: number }
Fallback (legacy Neumann) — if step 3 reports degraded: true (non-SPD input, non-square matrix, MCP error) OR if RUFLO_NEURAL_TRADER_DISABLE_CG=1:
npx neural-trader --portfolio optimize
Capture the weights output and tag the artifact metadata with method: 'neumann-fallback' and a reason field.
Store the optimal weights to trading-risk namespace with full provenance metadata. Take method and solver straight from the adapter's result so the operator can verify which backend ran:
mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__memory_store({
key: "portfolio-weights-PORTFOLIO_ID-TIMESTAMP",
namespace: "trading-risk",
value: JSON.stringify({
weights: result.solution, // number[] from step 3 (or weights from step 4 fallback)
method: result.method, // 'cg-sublinear-native' | 'cg-local' | 'neumann-fallback'
solver: result.solver, // 'sublinear-time-solver@1.7.0' | 'local-js-cg' | 'neural-trader-cli'
iterations: result.iterations,
residual: result.residual,
latencyMs: result.latencyMs,
capturedAt: NEW_DATE_ISO,
reason: FALLBACK_REASON || null
})
})
The trading-risk namespace is canonical (ADR-126 Phase 1; the five-namespace alignment). Long-lived — no TTL — because portfolio weights are the audit trail Phase 4 will Ed25519-sign.
Cross-check against historical patterns (optional but recommended):
mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__agentdb_pattern-search({
query: "portfolio weights Sharpe regime:CURRENT_REGIME",
namespace: "trading-risk"
})
If the new weights differ by more than 30% in any single asset from the historical median, flag for human review before applying. This is a guard-rail, not a hard block.
Acceptance criteria (ADR-126 Phase 3):
||cg − neumann||_∞ < 1e-4 on a fixed seed.cg-sublinear-native, cg-local, and neumann-fallback.Refs:
plugins/ruflo-neural-trader/src/sublinear-adapter.ts (the adapter)plugins/ruflo-neural-trader/benchmarks/portfolio-cg.bench.ts (the measured numbers)还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。
无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。
还没有评论。来写第一条吧。
对照HuggingFace router的模型列表与chat-ui配置,研究尚未收录的模型,编写简短英文说明,并同步添加到生产和开发配置。
为技术选型和设计决策创建ADR文档,沿用现有文件的连续编号,生成模板并登记到AgentDB,同时为找到的相关历史决策添加链接和依赖关系。
读取记录架构决策及其原因的ADR,创建并更新搜索索引和依赖关系图。支持两种文档格式,并汇总引用与状态的不一致情况。
删除ADR设计决策记录或关系信息后,清空并重建索引,移除残留的旧条目,再核对当前文件数与索引记录数是否一致;也可预览重建内容而不作更改。
将代码差异与记录已采纳设计决策的ADR进行核对,整理违反决策、引用过时记录及缺少相关记录的变更,并提出代码修正或决策调整建议。
检查已保存的架构决策记录(ADR),报告失效引用、替代关系中的循环和状态不一致问题,适合导入后的校验与发布前的数据检查。