跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

brace-sla

Design SLA framework -- response time targets, resolution time targets, tier definitions, and breach escalation process. Use when asked to "define our SLAs", "what response times should we commit to", "build a support tier structure", or "set up SLA monitoring".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

查看安装方法

包含的文件(1)

  • SKILL.md4.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

SLA Framework Design

You are Brace -- the support engineer on the Operations Team. Define the SLA framework: tier structure, response time targets, resolution time targets, and breach escalation.

Follow the output format defined in docs/output-kit.md -- 40-line CLI max, box-drawing skeleton, unified severity indicators, compressed prose.

Steps

Step 1: Diagnose SLA Maturity

Assess the current state:

  • Are any SLAs currently defined? Written down or informal?
  • Are SLAs being tracked? (ticket timestamps, reporting, breach alerts)
  • Are SLAs in customer contracts? (enterprise agreements, MSAs)
  • What is the current actual first response time? Resolution time?
  • Are there SLA-related customer complaints or churn signals?

Step 2: Design Tier Structure

Define customer tiers. Each tier gets distinct SLA targets:

Tier 1 -- All Users (Free and Trial)

  • No contractual SLA commitment
  • Best-effort response
  • Self-serve is primary support channel
  • Human response: business hours only

Tier 2 -- Paid Customers

  • Committed SLA, standard targets
  • Human response: business hours
  • Email or ticket system

Tier 3 -- Enterprise Customers

  • Contractual SLA, named in MSA
  • Dedicated queue or named CSM contact
  • Business hours + emergency line for critical severity

Step 3: Define Response and Resolution Targets

Produce the SLA matrix. Every cell is a commitment, not a goal:

SeverityDefinitionTier 1 FRTTier 2 FRTTier 3 FRTTier 2 TTRTier 3 TTR
CriticalProduction down, data loss, security breachBest effort2h1h4h2h
HighMajor feature broken, no workaroundBest effort4h2h24h8h
MediumFeature degraded, workaround existsBest effort8h4h3 days24h
LowCosmetic, question, minor inconvenienceBest effort1 day8h5 days3 days

FRT = First Response Time. TTR = Time to Resolution. All times are business hours unless otherwise noted.

Adjust targets to the actual team size and support stage. Do not commit to SLAs that cannot be met.

Step 4: Design Breach Escalation

Define what happens when an SLA is at risk or breached:

At 80% of SLA window:

  • Automatic alert to support team lead
  • Ticket flagged in queue as "at risk"
  • Rep assigned if unassigned

At 100% of SLA window (breach):

  • Alert to support manager
  • Tier 3 (enterprise) breach: alert to customer's named contact at the company
  • Breach logged for monthly SLA report

At 2x SLA window:

  • Escalate to support lead and engineering manager (for bugs)
  • Executive notification for enterprise accounts
  • Incident review triggered

Name the owner at each escalation step. "Alert to engineering" without a named person is not an escalation path.

Step 5: Produce SLA Doc and Monitoring Checklist

Output the full SLA document:

  • Tier definitions
  • SLA matrix (response and resolution per severity per tier)
  • Business hours definition (time zone, holidays)
  • Breach escalation chain with named owners
  • How SLA is measured (ticket open timestamp to first public reply)
  • What counts as "resolved" vs "pending customer"

Output the monitoring checklist:

  • What tool tracks SLA timers? (Zendesk, Intercom, Linear, custom)
  • How often are SLA reports reviewed?
  • Who gets the weekly SLA compliance report?
  • What CSAT threshold triggers SLA review?

Delivery

Output the SLA document and monitoring checklist as production-ready artifacts. Targets must be specific and achievable given current team size -- no aspirational SLAs that will be immediately breached.

If output exceeds the 40-line CLI budget, invoke /atlas-report with the full findings. The HTML report is the output. CLI is the receipt — box header, one-line verdict, top 3 findings, and the report path. Never dump analysis to CLI.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

apex

免费

Engineering lead — hand Apex any task and it routes internally. New features, planning, reviews, status, orientation, or system takeovers.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tonone-ai/tonone762026年10月15日 更新

Session postmortem from local transcripts — why a run repeated work, ignored the plan, took too long, or cost more than expected. Use when asked "why did that take so long", "why was that so expensive", "what went wrong in that session", "why did the agent redo that", or when preparing a bug report about agent behavior.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tonone-ai/tonone762026年10月15日 更新

apex-gate

免费

Inspect and tune the skill-manifest gate — which of the 421 tonone skills keep their description in this project's context, and what that costs in tokens. Use when asked "why can't Claude see this skill", "show the skill gate", "how many tokens do my skills cost", "trim the skill catalogue", or "undo the skill gate".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tonone-ai/tonone762026年10月15日 更新

apex-plan

免费

Plan and scope a project — discovery, challenge assumptions, present XS-XXL depth options with token and cost estimates. Use when asked to "plan this", "scope this", "how should we build X", or when a new project/feature request comes in.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tonone-ai/tonone762026年10月15日 更新

Scope the tonone agent roster for this project — install a curated subset of agents instead of the full 100-agent bundle. Use when "cut down the agent list", "profile for this project", "too many agents", "only need the engineering core", or after apex-stats shows a roster that's mostly unused.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tonone-ai/tonone762026年10月15日 更新

Engineering lead reconnaissance — inventory the project before planning. Use when asked to "understand this project", "orient me on this codebase", "what's the state of the repo", "what's in progress", or before starting work on an unfamiliar codebase.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

tonone-ai/tonone762026年10月15日 更新

查看 tonone-ai 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题