跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

coordination

Pentest coordination — orchestrates executor and validator agents with context-controlled spawning. Entry point for all engagements.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

transilienceai/communitytools星标 595(GitHub 595 + cccskills 0)

实测评分 未实测

查看安装方法

包含的文件(23)

  • SKILL.md7.1 KB
  • reference/ATTACK_INDEX.md17.1 KB
  • reference/bookkeeping.md3.8 KB
  • reference/context-injection.md3.2 KB
  • reference/coordinator.md4.6 KB
  • reference/coverage-matrix.json22.1 KB
  • reference/coverage-matrix.md14.1 KB
  • reference/creative-research.md5.1 KB
  • reference/credential-loading.md2.1 KB
  • reference/executor-role.md3.9 KB
  • reference/GIT_CONVENTIONS.md481 B
  • reference/orchestrator.md4.0 KB
  • reference/OUTPUT_STRUCTURE.md1014 B
  • reference/output-discipline.md6.2 KB
  • reference/PATT_STANDARD.md1.9 KB
  • reference/preflight-checklist.md6.6 KB
  • reference/principles.md7.5 KB
  • reference/role-matrix.md4.8 KB
  • reference/severity-calibration.md5.4 KB
  • reference/skeptic-role.md2.5 KB
  • reference/spawning-recipes.md7.3 KB
  • reference/VALIDATION.md16.9 KB
  • reference/validator-role.md7.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Coordination

Runs as a spawned subagent (one per target). Within its own context, the coordinator holds engagement state inline — it does not delegate its thinking to further sub-subagents. Thinks before every action.

The parent orchestrator (main session) must not execute this workflow inline. If you find yourself doing P1-P5 in the main session, you skipped the spawn step in skills/hackthebox/SKILL.md (or the relevant platform skill) and the bookkeeping discipline is silently disabled.

Principle (Rule 0)

Source code first. Read all accessible source — application code, config, scripts, share contents — before any executor batch. Every answer is in the data you already have. Guessing without reading is the most common failure mode.

Workflow

P0: Ingest scope
 ↓
P1: Recon + read source code → write attack-chain.md → run preflight-checklist
 ↓
┌→ P2: Think — read chain + experiments.md, write 3 hypotheses (≥1 [wildcard]), pick 1-2 to test
│  P2b: Research (conditional) — see reference/creative-research.md
│  P3: Execute — spawn 1-2 executors with CHAIN_CONTEXT [+ RESEARCH_BRIEF]
│  P4: Integrate — materialize each candidate; **validate it now** (interleaved, strict per-finding,
│      fresh blind agents) → CONFIRMED | REJECTED | CURE→re-validate | DROPPED; update chain, revise theory
│      Coverage flips only on VALID (coverage-by-VALID); REJECTED/DROPPED classes stay pending → keep searching
│      No progress 1 batch → consider P2b · goal_attempts ≥ 3 on any conceptual goal → P4b
└─ loop (max 30 experiments; mandatory skeptic at experiments 5, 15, 25)

P4b: Reset — re-read all recon + source + chain. Creative Research (mandatory). Fresh theory.
P5: Engagement-thoroughness validation + Report (validated/ = VALID/REPAIRED only; drop-entirely, no gaps section)

Steps

  1. Recon + Source Code — read all accessible code (see formats/reconnaissance.md). Run pre-flight checklist (reference/preflight-checklist.md).
  2. Think — write 3 hypotheses to attack-chain.md, ≥1 tagged [wildcard]. Pick 1-2 to spawn.
  3. Test — 1-2 executors per batch, integrate before next.
  4. Validate (interleaved) — validate each candidate the instant INTEGRATE materializes it, on fresh blind agents (strict per-finding cure/drop loop → CONFIRMED | REJECTED | CURE | DROPPED); at loop end run the engagement-thoroughness validator (see reference/validator-role.md).
  5. Report — the VALID/REPAIRED findings in {OUTPUT_DIR}/artifacts/validated/ (all of them, by construction) → Transilience PDF via formats/transilience-report-style/SKILL.md.

attack-chain.md

{OUTPUT_DIR}/attack-chain.md. Updated every batch. Sections: services, surface, theory (3 hypotheses + chosen), tested, next. Bullets, max 50 lines, prune old items to one-liners.

Bookkeeping

experiments.md ledger, tools/ logs, EXPERIMENT_ID injection, conceptual-goal counting — see reference/bookkeeping.md.

Creative Research (P2b)

Triggers: P4b reset (mandatory), goal_attempts ≥ 3 on any goal, novel error class, source code unreadable, every executor returned negative, no hypothesis at P2, no progress for 1 batch. See reference/creative-research.md. Most batches skip P2b.

Spawning

See reference/spawning-recipes.md for copy-paste-ready spawn patterns per role. Context contracts in reference/context-injection.md. Role boundaries in reference/role-matrix.md.

Roles

RoleFileContextWhen
Executor (explore)reference/executor-role.mdFull chain + skillsRecon / breadth
Executor (exploit)reference/executor-role.mdFull chain + skills + scenariosConfirmed theory
Skepticreference/skeptic-role.mdexperiments.md + recon (no chain)Mandatory at experiments 5, 15, 25
Validator (finding)reference/validator-role.mdEvidence only (blind)Interleaved — each candidate the instant it's materialized; fresh each cure round
Executor (cure)reference/executor-role.mdOnly named failed_checks + missing_evidence (no theory)On a DEMOTED verdict, before re-validation
Validator (engagement)reference/validator-role.mdOUTPUT_DIR only (blind)Once at loop end

Rules

  1. Autonomous. Coordinator MUST NOT call AskUserQuestion. If a credential is missing, run python3 tools/env-reader.py; if it returns NOT_SET, terminate with status=BLOCKED and emit a clear blocker. Asking is the parent orchestrator's job.
  2. Think before acting. Write 3 hypotheses (≥1 wildcard) to attack-chain.md before every batch. Record rejected ones — they are the search tree.
  3. Max 1-2 executors per batch. Recon can use more.
  4. Pass chain context + specific PATT_URL to executors. Not the full PATT map.
  5. 30-experiment cap.
  6. goal_attempts ≥ 3 on a conceptual goal → P4b reset. Count by goal, not literal technique string. Five PKINIT cert variants chasing "use this cert to authenticate" = five strikes against one goal. See reference/bookkeeping.md for the goal column.
  7. Mandatory skeptic at experiments 5, 15, 25 (see reference/skeptic-role.md).
  8. All output to OUTPUT_DIR.
  9. Sequential flag progression in multi-flag engagements. User-foothold first; root path usually flows from there.
  10. No partial completion as a success state. A multi-flag engagement is incomplete until every flag submits. status=FAILED_partial is a temporary marker, never a final outcome.
  11. Phase 3 (skill-update + Slack + queue) is parent-orchestrator only. Coordinator emits PHASE3_SUMMARY and exits.
  12. Source for library internals. Before writing Python against any library API (Impacket, ldap3, pyasn1), read the source. Prefer CLI tools (secretsdump.py, ticketer.py, getST.py).
  13. Background command discipline. State the specific result a tunnel/relay/listener will produce before spawning.
  14. Report gate. Validated findings exist → Transilience PDF report required. Read formats/transilience-report-style/pentest-report.md.
  15. Validation completeness. After validators run, every validated finding has evidence/validation/validation-summary.md. Flag any without proof.

Token Discipline

  • Internal output (chain, logs, reports): bullets, not prose.
  • Executor prompts: 1-2 relevant skill files + the specific PATT_URL.
  • attack-chain.md max 50 lines; bookkeeping max 10% of mission tokens.
  • User-facing output (reports, summaries): detailed.

References

reference/principles.md · reference/preflight-checklist.md · reference/role-matrix.md · reference/bookkeeping.md · reference/spawning-recipes.md · reference/context-injection.md · reference/creative-research.md · reference/executor-role.md · reference/skeptic-role.md · reference/validator-role.md · reference/VALIDATION.md · reference/ATTACK_INDEX.md · reference/OUTPUT_STRUCTURE.md · reference/GIT_CONVENTIONS.md · formats/INDEX.md

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Offensive AI security testing and exploitation framework. Systematically tests LLM applications for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities including prompt injection, model extraction, data poisoning, and supply chain attacks. Integrates with pentest workflows to discover and exploit AI-specific threats.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

transilienceai/communitytools5952026年7月30日 更新

API security testing - GraphQL, REST API, WebSocket, and Web-LLM attack techniques.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

transilienceai/communitytools5952026年7月30日 更新

Stitches confirmed single-asset findings into multi-hop attack paths across the organization. Builds a graph where nodes are assets and edges are confirmed exploit hops citing the findings that enable them.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

transilienceai/communitytools5952026年7月30日 更新

Acquire an authenticated session THROUGH MFA/OTP on an in-scope target and emit a reusable session artifact (Playwright storageState + Bearer) so executors can test the post-auth attack surface. Use when the highest-value authenticated classes (BOLA/IDOR/mass-assignment/injection on the real data APIs) are blocked because login is gated by SMS-OTP or TOTP MFA. Distinct from the authentication skill (which ATTACKS auth); this one legitimately authenticates and hands the session to the rest of the engagement.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

transilienceai/communitytools5952026年7月30日 更新

Authentication security testing - auth bypass, JWT attacks, OAuth flaws, password attacks, 2FA bypass, CAPTCHA bypass, and bot detection evasion.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

transilienceai/communitytools5952026年7月30日 更新

Smart contract security testing and blockchain CTF exploitation. Covers Solidity vulnerability analysis, EVM storage manipulation, delegatecall attacks, CREATE/CREATE2 address prediction, and common DeFi exploit patterns. Use when analyzing Solidity contracts, solving blockchain challenges, or testing smart contract security.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

transilienceai/communitytools5952026年7月30日 更新

查看 transilienceai 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题