跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

dataset-curation

Prepare datasets for language model training by formatting examples, checking conversation templates, and packing examples into training sequences. Document data sources, synthetic data ratios, and validation results in a dataset card before starting a run.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Prepare, format, and validate datasets for supervised fine-tuning and preference training. Use when converting raw data into training format, applying chat templates, configuring sequence packing, generating synthetic training data, or writing a dataset card before a run.

查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Convert raw examples into training-ready JSONL
  • Check conversation templates and assistant-only training targets
  • Review example boundaries after sequence packing
  • Document synthetic data ratios and dataset provenance

包含的文件(3)

  • SKILL.md7.8 KB
  • references/formats-and-templates.md6.4 KB
  • references/synthetic-data.md12.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

Dataset Curation

This skill assumes finetuning-method-selection already routed here — the next step is preparing data, not choosing a method. What follows: format selection by target method, the template/packing mechanics behind the most common silent training failures, rules for mixing in synthetic data without collapse, and the dataset card that closes out Phase 2 before a run starts.

Input: raw examples (demonstrations, preference judgments, or task prompts) plus a routing decision from finetuning-method-selection. Output format: a formatted, packed, validated JSONL dataset plus a completed dataset card — the Phase 2 artifact /finetune checks before launching training.

Format Selection

MethodShapeRows
SFT, single-turnInstruct (instruction/response or prompt/completion)~1,000+ floor
SFT, multi-turnConversation / ChatML messages list~1,000+ floor
DPO / ORPOPreference pair (prompt, chosen, rejected)Method-dependent, see preference-optimization
KTOUnpaired (prompt, completion, label)Method-dependent, see preference-optimization
GRPO / RLVRPrompt-only (prompt + verifier metadata)Method-dependent, see grpo-rlvr-training
  • ~1,000+ rows is the recommended floor for SFT, not a target. Below it, a handful of low-quality or duplicate examples can dominate the gradient; above it, quality over quantity — a smaller verified, deduplicated set beats a larger noisy one.

  • The ChatML shape, for orientation; the other four formats plus a ShareGPT conversion note live in references/formats-and-templates.md:

    {"messages": [
      {"role": "user", "content": "..."},
      {"role": "assistant", "content": "..."}
    ]}
    

Chat Templates and Loss Masking

Apply the target model's chat template before any concatenation or packing, never after — packing raw text and templating the packed blob afterward corrupts turn boundaries, landing role markers in the wrong place relative to each example.

  • Train on assistant responses only. Mask the loss (-100 in the labels tensor) over system/user turns and the template's own role markers — only assistant-turn content tokens contribute to loss.

  • Template/tokenizer mismatches are a top silent failure mode. A model trained against one chat template but served or evaluated with a different one degrades without erroring. Verify the same template string used in training is applied at inference and eval time.

  • Keep the dataset in messages shape and let the trainer template and mask it (assistant_only_loss=True in current TRL) — pre-rendering to a flat text field destroys the turn boundaries masking needs. Full code sketch: references/formats-and-templates.md. Sanity-check before training — decode only unmasked positions; expect only assistant text:

    keep = batch["labels"][0] != -100
    print(tokenizer.decode(batch["input_ids"][0][keep]))
    

Packing

Without packing, 40–70% of compute is spent on padding — variable-length examples batched at a fixed sequence length waste the gap between each example's length and the batch's max. Packing concatenates multiple examples into one sequence up to the max length, cutting most of that waste.

  • Packing changes batch semantics. A packed sequence can contain several original examples, so "steps per epoch" and any LR schedule keyed to example count shift once packing is on — recompute schedule milestones against packed-sequence count.

  • MANDATORY: decode and manually inspect 5–10 packed sequences before scaling to a full run. Confirm example boundaries land where expected, template markers are intact per sub-example, and the loss mask is still assistant-only within each packed sequence. Not optional — packing bugs are silent (the loss curve looks normal) and only surface in eval quality, hours later:

    for seq in packed_dataset.select(range(10)):
        print(tokenizer.decode(seq["input_ids"]))
    

Synthetic Data Rules

  • Keep ≥25% real data as a collapse guard. Training on a growing share of model-generated data without a real-data floor drives measurable quality collapse over successive generations — 25% real is the minimum that holds the line. General-domain replay rows count toward this floor — "real" means "not generated for this task from this student," not "human-authored." An all-synthetic-by-construction dataset can meet the ≥25% floor through replay alone (see references/synthetic-data.md's Replay-Mix Construction recipe); state which rows count as "real" in the dataset card rather than leaving the floor structurally unmeetable.
  • Magpie and rejection sampling are the workhorses. Magpie extracts prompts from the model's own template prior; rejection sampling generates several candidates per prompt and keeps only the ones a filter passes. Both beat naive single-shot generation.
  • Targeted, student-aware generation beats static generation by 1.3–2x sample efficiency — aiming at the student's actual failure modes hits a quality bar with fewer filtered examples.
  • Typical accept rates after filtering run 10–30%. Plan volume accordingly — a 10,000-row target at 15% accept needs ~65,000+ raw generations.
  • Generation-method ranking, filter funnel, replay- mix construction, and distillation pattern: references/synthetic-data.md.

The Dataset Card

Every dataset that reaches training gets a card — the required Phase 2 artifact /finetune checks before launching. The card is not free-form documentation; it MUST carry these fields:

  • Provenance — where every row came from (real source(s), synthetic method(s), or both), traceable to trace-to-training-data output.
  • Counts — total rows, and rows per split (train/eval/held-out) if split.
  • Synthetic/real ratio — the measured ratio, checked against the ≥25% real floor above.
  • Dedup method — exact-match, semantic (embedding threshold), or both; see the filter funnel in references/synthetic-data.md.
  • Template used — the exact chat template string/identifier, kept consistent through inference and eval — this is what ties an eval-harness-first run back to the checkpoint.
  • Packing config — whether packing was used, max sequence length, and confirmation the 5–10-sequence manual inspection above was done.

A dataset missing any of these six fields isn't ready for /finetune — the card is a gate, not a summary written after the fact.

Phase 2 Exit Checklist

Before handing off to /finetune, confirm:

  1. Format matches the method (table above).
  2. Template applied before concatenation.
  3. Loss masked to assistant turns only.
  4. 5–10 packed sequences decoded and read.
  5. ≥25% real data in the final mix.
  6. Dataset card complete — all six fields.

References

  • references/formats-and-templates.md — JSONL examples per format, current-TRL masking code, and the ShareGPT conversion note.
  • references/synthetic-data.md — generation-method ranking, filter funnel, replay-mix construction, and teacher→student distillation pattern.

Related skills: finetuning-method-selection routes here; lora-qlora-recipes, vision-sft, and preference-optimization consume the datasets this skill produces; trace-to-training-data is the provenance source for graded-trajectory datasets; eval-harness-first grades the resulting checkpoint.

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Build and review interfaces against WCAG 2.2 accessibility guidelines. Covers keyboard navigation, screen readers that read interface content aloud, accessible forms, mobile support, and display preferences, helping identify and fix barriers to using a website or app.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Audit an interface for accessibility issues
  • Add keyboard navigation and focus management
  • Improve screen reader support for forms
wshobson/agents4.1万2026年10月19日 更新

Review AI-generated code for problems hidden behind successful runs. Check failure handling, resource cleanup, unusual inputs, nonexistent dependencies, and departures from project conventions to identify missing safeguards before merging or accepting the work as complete.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Audit code after an AI generation session
  • Review an AI-generated pull request before merging
  • Investigate brittle code that appears to work
wshobson/agents4.1万2026年10月19日 更新

Build Apache Airflow workflows for data pipelines and scheduled jobs. The skill guides task dependencies, retries, waiting for conditions, testing, and deployment, with patterns for tasks that can be safely rerun.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Building scheduled data pipelines
  • Designing task order and dependencies
  • Implementing custom tasks and condition checks
wshobson/agents4.1万2026年10月19日 更新

Plan and carry out an AngularJS to Angular migration, from choosing a rewrite strategy to converting components, services, and routes. Includes a hybrid approach that runs both frameworks together while individual features are migrated.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Planning an AngularJS to Angular migration
  • Moving a large app one feature at a time
  • Converting directives into Angular components
wshobson/agents4.1万2026年10月19日 更新

Identify software protections that hinder inspection, such as debugger detection and obfuscation that makes code harder to understand. Support authorized binary analysis and CTF security challenges with protection findings, bypass strategies, reports, and analysis scripts.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Identify protections in an authorized malware sample
  • Plan analysis of a packed executable
  • Implement debugger detection for a CTF challenge
wshobson/agents4.1万2026年10月19日 更新

Design and review REST and GraphQL APIs with consistent naming, data structures, error responses, pagination for large result sets, and versioning strategies. Helps teams define shared standards and plan changes that existing clients can adopt gradually.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Designing a new REST or GraphQL API
  • Reviewing API specifications before implementation
  • Establishing shared API design standards
wshobson/agents4.1万2026年10月19日 更新

查看 wshobson 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题