跳到正文
cccskills
免费在 GitHub 公开

protect-mcp-setup

Set up rules that allow or block Claude Code tool calls, and record executed tool names in digitally signed receipts. The skill also explains offline verification and the limits of what those records prove.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

原文查看原文说明

Configure Cedar policy enforcement and Ed25519 signed receipts for Claude Code tool calls. Use when setting up projects that need cryptographic audit trails, policy-gated tool execution, or compliance-ready evidence of agent actions.

集成工具AWS
查看安装方法

适用场景

  • Restricting which Claude Code tools may run
  • Recording tool names in digitally signed receipts
  • Verifying receipts offline with a public key
  • Preparing agent activity records for audit review

包含的文件(2)

  • SKILL.md8.2 KB
  • references/receipt-format.md1.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

安装前可以查看交给 AI 代理的指令内容。

protect-mcp — Policy Enforcement + Signed Receipts

Cryptographic governance for every Claude Code tool call. Each invocation is evaluated against a Cedar policy and produces an Ed25519-signed receipt that anyone can verify offline.

Overview

Claude Code runs powerful tools: Bash, Edit, Write, WebFetch. By default there is no audit trail, no policy enforcement, and no way to prove what was decided after the fact. protect-mcp closes all three gaps:

  • Cedar policies (AWS's open authorization engine) evaluate every tool call before execution. Cedar deny is authoritative.
  • Ed25519 receipts record the name of each tool that ran, signed with your key.
  • Offline verification via npx @veritasacta/verify. No server, no account, no trust in the operator.

Problem

AI agents make decisions that affect money, safety, and rights. The Claude Code session log records what happened, but the log is:

  • Mutable — anyone with access can edit it
  • Unsigned — there is no way to prove integrity
  • Operator-bound — verification requires trusting whoever holds the log

For compliance contexts (finance, healthcare, regulated research), this is not sufficient. You need tamper-evident evidence that can be verified by third parties without trusting you.

Solution

Add protect-mcp to your Claude Code project:

# 1. Install the plugin (adds hooks + skill to your project)
claude plugin install wshobson/agents/protect-mcp

# 2. Create ./protect.cedar (see below). The plugin installs the hooks.

# 3. Create the signing key once (protect-mcp 0.7.4 sign does not create it).
#    An existing key is never replaced. See references/receipt-format.md to rotate.
if [ ! -e ./protect-mcp.key ]; then
  d=$(mktemp -d) && npx protect-mcp@0.7.4 init --dir "$d" && mv "$d/keys/gateway.json" ./protect-mcp.key
fi
echo "/protect-mcp.key" >> .gitignore

# 4. Use Claude Code normally. Every tool call is now policy-evaluated
#    and produces a signed receipt in ./receipts/

Hook Configuration

Installing the plugin adds both hooks from hooks/hooks.json. Each hook runs a script bundled with the plugin:

{
  "hooks": {
    "PreToolUse": [
      {
        "matcher": ".*",
        "hooks": [
          { "type": "command", "command": "\"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}\"/hooks/evaluate.sh" }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "PostToolUse": [
      {
        "matcher": ".*",
        "hooks": [
          { "type": "command", "command": "\"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}\"/hooks/sign.sh" }
        ]
      }
    ]
  }
}

Claude Code passes the hook event to the command as JSON on stdin and does not set TOOL_NAME or TOOL_INPUT variables. evaluate.sh reads tool_name and tool_input from that payload and passes them to protect-mcp as flags; sign.sh reads tool_name only, because the 0.7.4 signer records nothing else. Set PROTECT_MCP_POLICY, PROTECT_MCP_RECEIPTS, and PROTECT_MCP_KEY to change the default paths. When the policy file is missing, the PreToolUse hook prints a warning to stderr and allows the call.

What each hook does

PreToolUse — Runs BEFORE the tool executes. Evaluates the tool call against your Cedar policy file. If Cedar returns deny, the hook exits with code 2 and Claude Code blocks the tool call entirely.

PostToolUse runs AFTER the tool completes. It signs a receipt that names the tool and appends it to ./receipts/receipts.jsonl. protect-mcp 0.7.4 does not record the tool input or output.

Cedar Policy File

Create ./protect.cedar at the project root:

// Read-only tools: one rule can name several tools in `when`. Add WebFetch
// with your own URL rule.
permit (principal, action == Action::"MCP::Tool::call", resource) when {
    resource == Tool::"Read" || resource == Tool::"Glob" || resource == Tool::"Grep"
};

// Safe commands only; git limited to read subcommands
permit (principal, action == Action::"MCP::Tool::call", resource == Tool::"Bash") when {
    context has input && context.input has command &&
    (context.input.command like "git status*" || context.input.command like "git diff*" ||
     context.input.command like "git log*" || context.input.command like "git show*" ||
     context.input.command like "npm*" || context.input.command like "ls*" ||
     context.input.command like "cat*" || context.input.command like "echo*" ||
     context.input.command like "pwd*" || context.input.command like "test*")
};

// No chaining (`&` also denies `2>&1`), `$` expansion, redirection (`>` or
// `<`, which covers `<(`), file output (`git diff --output`), or rm -rf
forbid (principal, action == Action::"MCP::Tool::call", resource == Tool::"Bash") when {
    context has input && context.input has command &&
    (context.input.command like "*;*" || context.input.command like "*&*" ||
     context.input.command like "*|*" || context.input.command like "*$*" ||
     context.input.command like "*`*" || context.input.command like "*>*" ||
     context.input.command like "*<*" || context.input.command like "*\n*" ||
     context.input.command like "*--output*" || context.input.command like "*rm -rf*")
};

// Writes only inside the project (paths are absolute), never via `..`
permit (principal, action == Action::"MCP::Tool::call", resource) when {
    (resource == Tool::"Write" || resource == Tool::"Edit") &&
    context has input && context.input has file_path &&
    context.input.file_path like "/path/to/project/*"
};
forbid (principal, action == Action::"MCP::Tool::call", resource) when {
    (resource == Tool::"Write" || resource == Tool::"Edit") &&
    context has input && context.input has file_path &&
    (context.input.file_path like "*/../*" || context.input.file_path like "*/..")
};

String matching is best-effort: like checks the raw string, not a resolved path, and an npm* permit runs arbitrary code, so it is only as safe as the project's scripts.

Verification

Verify every receipt against the public key in ./protect-mcp.key:

PUB=$(node -p 'JSON.parse(require("fs").readFileSync("./protect-mcp.key")).publicKey')
npx @veritasacta/verify@0.9.2 --replay-chain ./receipts/receipts.jsonl --key "$PUB"
# Exit 0 = every receipt verified
# Exit 1 = a receipt failed (tampered, wrong key, or malformed line)
# Exit 2 = the file could not be read

The plugin's slash commands do the same inside Claude Code. /verify-receipt takes one receipt in its own file, e.g., from tail -n 1 ./receipts/receipts.jsonl > receipt.json.

/verify-receipt receipt.json
/audit-chain --last 20

Receipt Format

Each receipt is one line of ./receipts/receipts.jsonl. See references/receipt-format.md for a sample.

  • Ed25519 signatures (RFC 8032) over all fields but signature
  • JCS canonicalization (RFC 8785) before signing
  • No public key in the receipt, so pass it with --key
  • No link to the previous receipt, so a deleted line goes undetected

Why This Matters

BeforeAfter
"Trust me, the agent only read files"Cryptographically provable: every Read logged and signed
"The log shows it happened"The receipt proves it happened, and no one can edit it
"You'd have to audit our system"Anyone can verify every receipt offline
"Logs might be different by now"Ed25519 signatures lock the record at signing time

Standards

  • Ed25519 — RFC 8032 (digital signatures)
  • JCS — RFC 8785 (deterministic JSON canonicalization)
  • Cedar — AWS's open authorization policy language
  • IETF draft — draft-farley-acta-signed-receipts

Related

评价

还没有评价。欢迎分享你的使用感受。

评论

无需登录即可发表。欢迎分享使用感受、提问,或说明在哪些环境下无法运行。

还没有评论。来写第一条吧。

提交后会立即公开。请勿填写邮箱、电话等个人信息。URL 最多 2 个。

0 / 1000 字

此表单受 reCAPTCHA 保护,适用 Google 的隐私权政策和服务条款。

同一仓库的技能

Build and review interfaces against WCAG 2.2 accessibility guidelines. Covers keyboard navigation, screen readers that read interface content aloud, accessible forms, mobile support, and display preferences, helping identify and fix barriers to using a website or app.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Audit an interface for accessibility issues
  • Add keyboard navigation and focus management
  • Improve screen reader support for forms
wshobson/agents4.1万2026年10月19日 更新

Review AI-generated code for problems hidden behind successful runs. Check failure handling, resource cleanup, unusual inputs, nonexistent dependencies, and departures from project conventions to identify missing safeguards before merging or accepting the work as complete.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Audit code after an AI generation session
  • Review an AI-generated pull request before merging
  • Investigate brittle code that appears to work
wshobson/agents4.1万2026年10月19日 更新

Build Apache Airflow workflows for data pipelines and scheduled jobs. The skill guides task dependencies, retries, waiting for conditions, testing, and deployment, with patterns for tasks that can be safely rerun.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Building scheduled data pipelines
  • Designing task order and dependencies
  • Implementing custom tasks and condition checks
wshobson/agents4.1万2026年10月19日 更新

Plan and carry out an AngularJS to Angular migration, from choosing a rewrite strategy to converting components, services, and routes. Includes a hybrid approach that runs both frameworks together while individual features are migrated.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Planning an AngularJS to Angular migration
  • Moving a large app one feature at a time
  • Converting directives into Angular components
wshobson/agents4.1万2026年10月19日 更新

Identify software protections that hinder inspection, such as debugger detection and obfuscation that makes code harder to understand. Support authorized binary analysis and CTF security challenges with protection findings, bypass strategies, reports, and analysis scripts.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Identify protections in an authorized malware sample
  • Plan analysis of a packed executable
  • Implement debugger detection for a CTF challenge
wshobson/agents4.1万2026年10月19日 更新

Design and review REST and GraphQL APIs with consistent naming, data structures, error responses, pagination for large result sets, and versioning strategies. Helps teams define shared standards and plan changes that existing clients can adopt gradually.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

  • Designing a new REST or GraphQL API
  • Reviewing API specifications before implementation
  • Establishing shared API design standards
wshobson/agents4.1万2026年10月19日 更新

查看 wshobson 的全部技能

报告此技能的问题