MetaBackdoor trains the model to activate hidden behavior when the total token count crosses a speci
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
テスト設計、脆弱性診断、品質保証(1.3万 件)
概要と使いどころ
MetaBackdoor trains the model to activate hidden behavior when the total token count crosses a speci
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Nicht böse, nur falsch optimiert: Was OpenAIs RubyGems-Vorfall über KI-Agenten und Reward-Hacking zeigt Wie OpenAIs Agenten durch Reward-Hacking eine
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
LLM) can be manipulated through prompt injection, whether a retrieval pipeline leaks confidential da
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Kurz gesagt: LLM-Sicherheit schützt Anwendungen mit großen Sprachmodellen vor Angriffen wie Prompt I
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Attack Success Rate (360 runs 60 payloads 2 models ~3 reps) Paradigm gemma4-e2b (local, Ollama
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for pip CVE scanning and auto-patching via OSV.dev API.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Train an OpenAmer-specific small model from the collected brain data (QLoRA on NVIDIA, CPU smoke-test on laptop). 'The organism becomes its own brain' — build a fine-tune dataset, train, eval, export.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reporting build, test, or deploy results - enforces real tool output over plausible claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dan Goodin – 8/27/2026 | 157 How OpenAI let a mob of LLM agents game a test and ransack Hugging Face Without authorization, 1,200 OpenAI agents conspi
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan, execute, and document validation, verification, and transfer of analytical procedures under the governing framework - ICH Q2(R2) and Q14, USP <1220>/<1225>/<1226>, ICH M10 bioanalytical, CLSI EP, or ISO/IEC 17025. Use for HPLC, LC-MS/MS, GC, CE, ICP-MS, dissolution, qNMR, qPCR, NIR, and ligand binding or cell-based assays whenever the question is whether a procedure is fit for its intended purpose. Triggers include "method validation", "analytical method validation", "AMV", "validation protocol", "acceptance criteria", "linearity", "reportable range", "accuracy and precision", "repeatability", "intermediate precision", "recovery", "LOD", "LOQ", "detection limit", "quantitation limit", "specificity", "robustness", "method transfer", "method comparison", "Deming", "Passing-Bablok", "Bland-Altman", "equivalence testing", "OOS investigation", "ICH Q2", "Q2(R2)", "Q14", "USP 1225", "ICH M10", "incurred sample reanalysis", "ISR", "CLSI EP", and any request to show that an assay works.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master authentication and authorization patterns including JWT, OAuth2, session management, and RBAC to build secure, scalable access control systems. Use when implementing auth systems, securing APIs, or debugging security issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Browse the web for any task — research topics, read articles, interact with web apps, fill forms, take screenshots, extract data, and test web pages. Use whenever a browser would be useful, not just when the user explicitly asks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build production Apache Airflow DAGs with best practices for operators, sensors, testing, and deployment. Use when creating data pipelines, orchestrating workflows, or scheduling batch jobs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Understand anti-reversing, obfuscation, and protection techniques encountered during software analysis. Use this skill when analyzing malware evasion techniques, when implementing anti-debugging protections for CTF challenges, when reverse engineering packed binaries, or when building security research tools that need to detect virtualized environments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Regression testing strategies for AI-assisted development. Sandbox-mode API testing without database dependencies, automated bug-check workflows, and patterns to catch AI blind spots where the same model writes and reviews code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomously improve a real artifact (code, training recipe, agent harness, data pipeline, prompt) against an objective and an evaluator, using Hypothesis Tree Refinement (HTR) from the Arbor paper. Use this whenever someone wants to iteratively optimize something over many experiments without overfitting — e.g. "get my model's eval score up", "improve this agent/harness", "tune this pipeline", "beat the baseline on this benchmark", "run a search over approaches and keep the best", "do an MLE-bench / Kaggle-style optimization", or any long-horizon "make this artifact better and don't just memorize the dev set" task. Trigger it even when the user doesn't say "Arbor" or "hypothesis tree" but describes repeated experiment-and-evaluate loops, branching exploration of competing ideas, or worries about a dev/test gap. Runs Claude itself as the coordinator with subagent executors in isolated git worktrees; for the standalone `arbor` CLI tool see references/arbor-upstream.md.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build comprehensive attack trees to visualize threat paths. Use when mapping attack scenarios, identifying defense gaps, or communicating security risks to stakeholders.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
RED-GREEN-REFACTOR for process documentation - baseline without skill, write addressing failures, iterate closing loopholes
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when doing ANY task involving Supabase. Triggers: Supabase products (Database, Auth, Edge Functions, Realtime, Storage, Vectors, Cron, Queues); client libraries and SSR integrations (supabase-js, @supabase/ssr) in Next.js, React, SvelteKit, Astro, Remix; auth issues (login, logout, sessions, JWT, cookies, getSession, getUser, getClaims, RLS); Supabase CLI or MCP server; schema changes, migrations, declarative schemas, security audits, Postgres extensions (pg_graphql, pg_cron, pg_vector); debugging and troubleshooting errors or unexpected behavior on Supabase projects (HTTP errors, Postgres errors, RLS surprises, permission denied, schema cache issues, timeouts, Edge Function crashes, Realtime drops, Storage failures) and reading or querying logs (Logs Explorer, ClickHouse).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive web quality audit covering performance, accessibility, SEO, and best practices. Use when asked to "audit my site", "review web quality", "run lighthouse audit", "check page quality", or "optimize my website".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
TDD for process documentation - test with subagents before writing, iterate until bulletproof
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement WCAG 2.2 compliant interfaces with mobile accessibility, inclusive design patterns, and assistive technology support. Use when auditing accessibility, implementing ARIA patterns, building for screen readers, or ensuring inclusive user experiences.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Never test mock behavior. Never add test-only methods to production classes. Understand dependencies before mocking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review docs/prose for Writing Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my docs", "check writing style", "audit prose", "review docs voice and tone", or "check this page against the writing handbook".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。